If you are incapable of executing a left turn without getting into accident or feel like being an inconsiderate prick, do what the OP says.

At 0:35 in the video, or 12:26:30 on the dashboard cam time, you can see that the light has turned red when the cam car begins his turn, you can also see, that at the time the light turns red, the Van is just entering the intersection, therefore it is clearly running a red light.

This is not a case of entering the intersection during a yellow, the Van driver was not even 25% of the way into the intersection before the light was red.

One could argue that the cam vehicle driver, felt that the red light was an indication that it was practical to make a left hand turn, as it should provided a safety from through traffic who obey it. Thus satisfying the safety/hazard check requirement of the law.

Honestly, if this was BC, I would anticipate that the cam vehicle driver should be assessed at 0% fault, or at least a very low amount.

Actually, if you pause it at 34 sec, you could see that the yellow light was still on when the Van entered the intersection.

Even if the van driver had run a red light - the Cam driver should have waited till he had a clear view before turning.

^Fixed

If you are worry about someone running a red and hitting you, then you should stop crossing any intersections altogether.

and if everyone does what OP does, traffic would've come to a halt...(as if it is not bad enough already...lol)
there is nothing wrong with being the 2nd car to enter the intersection on a left turn lane...you just have to proceed with cautions.

exactly... the van had the right of way in this case. the van was already in the intersection and stopped in time so he wouldnt hit the infinity. the cam car then has to give the van the right of way to CLEAR the intersection. the cam car is at fault in this accident

still lol'ing at "good thing i have a camera system"

Since when does a yellow light mean you have the right of way in an intersection?

A yellow light means STOP, unless it is unsafe to do so.

"the driver of a vehicle approaching the intersection and facing the yellow light must cause it to stop before entering the marked crosswalk on the near side of the intersection, or if there is no marked crosswalk, before entering the intersection, unless the stop cannot be made in safety…"

The yellow light ticked on at 12:26:26, we see the van rolling over the crosswalk at 12:26:29 during a very late stage amber light.


Noriega v. Lewars, 2008 BCSC 1405

I expect that this case (cam vs van) would come down to whether or not the plaintiff would be able to prove that the defendant (van driver) did not exercise due diligence in avoiding an accident - such as anticipating left turning vehicles and slowing down/stopping for a yellow light.



BC Case law pertaining to a similar accident. I am sure there are many of these scenarios, each interpreted different by different judges and based on different extenuating circumstances.

The honest fact of the matter is, this really could go either way.

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/...08BCSC1405.htm

There are many other reasons for the Judge finding for the plantiff, but within the findings the Judge states:

Therefore, according to this particular case, entering an intersection during a late stage amber light is likely to be considered unsafe.

ya except the van was already in the intersection when the cam car began it's turn. the van had to clear the intersection therefore he had the right of way. had the van hit the black infinity, the van would have been at fault.

^its almost never the vehicle that is going straight that is at fault. Its always the job of the vehicle turning to make sure its safe to do so. If the white van hit the black infiniti it would be the black infinitis fault
Posted via RS Mobile

I did a quick search on this topic on my web site. You may wish to browse both the column on the topic and the case law for an in depth understanding. Most drivers do not have adequate knowledge of this topic.

I get frustrated when cars don't go out far enough into the intersection depending on which one. My commute home always has me turning left on E 1st Ave Northbound onto Renfrew. If anybody knows that intersection they will know the due to the length and design of that intersection you can easily fit 2 full cars waiting to turn left and a 3rd car over the white lines without any problems at all. It drives me crazy when the first car is a complete noob.

As for the video the guy with the camera is an idiot for assuming that just b/c the first car turned left when the light was changing that it was clear and he should just follow. Whenever I'm the second car turning left I always have a slight delay when the first car is turning left b/c I still have to ensure it's safe for me.

Why not just call me an inconsiderate prick then?

in general, or because of the whole left turn thing?

Because personal attacks are against the rules?

:troll::fullofwin:

Seriously... congrats on your opening post, we're all very proud of your inimitable ability to stay within the law and still be a complete self-righteous douche by showing no consideration for the other drivers on the road. It's a really unique skill.

the 2nd car shouldn't cross the line as he's entering a non clear intersection and could be ticketed for that. however if only one person turned every light traffic would be a nightmare and it's generlly ignored.

all 3 of thoese people failed and helped create the crash, but the cam guy is at fault for the crash for turning when not clear