the start of WW3?

[dachinesedude]

if a WW3 does ever happen, it wont last very long

its gonna be 10+ nations against like 1 or 2, the shit starters prob wont get much help this time around

[JD¹³]

Originally Posted by EvilBroScientist

well, how exactly is anyone going to ambush a US carrier group? they can see over every nearby hill, radar, probably scout aircraft going around the area, and satellite visuals of the entire area around the canal

I agree that it would be very difficult. Impossible for an insurgency but not another national force. But those battle groups aren't invincible.

Hell they had a Chinese sub surface right in the middle of one just to say "look what we can do" a few years ago.

[rsx]

Originally Posted by EvilBroScientist

well, how exactly is anyone going to ambush a US carrier group? they can see over every nearby hill, radar, probably scout aircraft going around the area, and satellite visuals of the entire area around the canal

See: Iraqi insurgents & IED

Insurgents can use the indigenous populace as cover- and use it to create panic and fear. Personnel operating the canals are probably the best targets, not the ships.

[murd0c]

After looking at those pictures I want to play battleship lol

[eurochevy]

Originally Posted by Teh Doucher

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/02...erman-airport/

they weren't even killed by a german.... they were killed by a 21 from kosovo and i highly doubt the US wants to go into kosovo and fight for such a stupid reason

[BNR32_Coupe]

Originally Posted by JD¹³

I agree that it would be very difficult. Impossible for an insurgency but not another national force. But those battle groups aren't invincible.

Hell they had a Chinese sub surface right in the middle of one just to say "look what we can do" a few years ago.

the US military isn't invincible, but they're the best



^ technology that can detect a baseball in space. chinese submarines however...

[Kamui712]

pffft forget WW3... we should worry about WW5

YouTube

[Gnomes]

Originally Posted by CRS

Actually, I better and more realistic guess would be China.

Before wikileaks, I thought China was the puppetmaster behind North Korea while USA backs up South.

[Death2Theft]

WW3 needs to happen to take down monsanto look up "the world according to monsanto" youtube.

[StylinRed]

Originally Posted by Teh Doucher

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TncgsS0FDWg

what's weird is when you google "russia, libya" that story doesn't even turn up in the results, not even in the "news" section

you have to add "satellite" to the search string and it'll turn up some Blogs that talk about Russias findings

odd...

[FerrariEnzo]

lol the Afganistan battle isnt even called World War and it was WAY bigger then this

[strykn]

There will never be a real World War 3 due to nuclear deterrence and for whatever reason it actually happens, say hello to nuclear winter.

[SkinnyPupp]

THERE WILL BE WORLD WAR 3 IN 2012, THEN IT WILL END ON DECEMBER 31 WHEN THE WORLD IS DESTROYED

[HonestTea]

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert Einstein

[Culture_Vulture]

I get the feeling that a good number of people who posted in this thread are pulling random preconceived ideas out of their asses.

A World War will be caused by a myriad of factors, spiraling (as history might suggest) down to domination, ideology, or an increasing possibility, resources. You don't just take one random snippet found somewhere on the internet and single it out as the cause of a World War.
And, if you're gonna do that, at least take the effort to copy and paste the article.

[Death2Theft]

All of the above check.

YouTube