REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

View Poll Results: 48÷2(9+3)
2 217 59.62%
288 147 40.38%
Voters: 364. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2011, 10:26 AM   #51
In RS I Trust
 
murd0c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mission
Posts: 20,777
Thanked 17,661 Times in 4,345 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
I never passed math in school. Accounting FTW
Posted via RS Mobile
Advertisement
murd0c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:30 AM   #52
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Jgresch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PM
Posts: 4,479
Thanked 3,349 Times in 843 Posts
Failed 207 Times in 86 Posts
Whoever says this is grade 10 math needs to go back to grade 5 or 6 when we actually learned about this lol
Jgresch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:34 AM   #53
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Delta
Posts: 864
Thanked 47 Times in 36 Posts
Failed 125 Times in 40 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c View Post
I never passed math in school. Accounting FTW
Posted via RS Mobile
lol, so you can't do complex mathmatics so you decided to stick with basic math, and peoples money


i'd totally get you to be my accountant...


baggdis300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:35 AM   #54
xxx
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 777 Times in 247 Posts
Failed 58 Times in 27 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto View Post
Fuck... I used up all my fails in this thread. I'm sure others will take the reins and fail all those suckers that got 2. Also, someone please fail the post right above this one, too.
There's a reason why university professors, math teachers, calculators cannot come to an agreement on this.

It's a poorly written equation designed to spark a heated debate (which it has). An equation written in bad form begets ambiguity which begets multiple interpretations. Ask any knowledgeable math professor and he will tell you the equation is ambiguous because of the way it is written.

The only idiots are the ones who got something other than 2 or 288.


Get off your high horse.
Oleophobic is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 04-12-2011, 10:35 AM   #55
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
FerrariEnzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
Failed 1,234 Times in 307 Posts
i think this should be in the FIGHT CLUB section.. haha
__________________
My Buy&Sell Feedback, Thanx
FerrariEnzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:38 AM   #56
My homepage has been set to RS
 
dachinesedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,224
Thanked 1,207 Times in 432 Posts
Failed 203 Times in 83 Posts
calculator: 48 ÷ 2(9+3) = 2

excel: 48 / 2(9+3) = 288

excel: 48 / (2(9+3)) = 2

but seeing how its written like 48 ÷ 2(9+3), i say 2
dachinesedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:39 AM   #57
Prince of the Apes
 
bloodmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 2,469
Thanked 3,046 Times in 672 Posts
Failed 1,163 Times in 238 Posts
http://mathcentral.uregina.ca/QQ/dat...7/h/brit1.html how to do bedmas lol
__________________
There's times in life where I want a relationship, but then I cum.
Quote:
[23-08, 13:17] nabs i've gripped ice boy's shaft before
Quote:
[26-08, 13:50] Jesusjuice is this a sports car forum? why are there so many hondas?

Last edited by bloodmack; 04-12-2011 at 11:09 AM.
bloodmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:49 AM   #58
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 100
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Failed 53 Times in 13 Posts
who ever is getting a 2 is a retard.
BEDMAS is not wrong, learn how to apply it.
One more thing, I would trust excel more than the calculator most of the time.
t_sack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:52 AM   #59
MG1
Fathered more RS members than anybody else. Who's your daddy?
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,202
Thanked 11,831 Times in 5,078 Posts
Failed 317 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by anti_rice View Post
BEDMAS works. You just need to know how to use BEDMAS. The answer is 288. 48÷2(9+3) is the same as 48 ÷ 2 x (9 + 3). Whoever thinks 2 is part of the bracket is wrong.
There's the word, "Bed" in it = winning!

remember the old grade four joke?

Add a girl, subtract her clothes, divide her legs, and multiply.
__________________
Quote:
"there but for the grace of god go I"
Quote:
Youth is, indeed, wasted on the young.
YODO = You Only Die Once.

Dirty look from MG1 can melt steel beams.

"There must be dissonance before resolution - MG1" a musical reference.
MG1 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-12-2011, 10:53 AM   #60
Zombie Mod
 
Presto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 9,919
Thanked 5,201 Times in 1,570 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.T View Post
There's a reason why university professors, math teachers, calculators cannot come to an agreement on this.

It's a poorly written equation designed to spark a heated debate (which it has). An equation written in bad form begets ambiguity which begets multiple interpretations. Ask any knowledgeable math professor and he will tell you the equation is ambiguous because of the way it is written.

The only idiots are the ones who got something other than 2 or 288.


Get off your high horse.
Sorry, how is the equation ambiguous? I really don't see how this can be. Is BEDMAS invalidated now that people are plugging numbers into the calculator? What rule are people using to come to the answer 2?
Presto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:54 AM   #61
In RS I Trust
 
murd0c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mission
Posts: 20,777
Thanked 17,661 Times in 4,345 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by baggdis300 View Post
lol, so you can't do complex mathmatics so you decided to stick with basic math, and peoples money


i'd totally get you to be my accountant...


I said I took accounting in school not that I'm a accountant. There is a little difference I think.
Posted via RS Mobile
murd0c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:59 AM   #62
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Delta
Posts: 864
Thanked 47 Times in 36 Posts
Failed 125 Times in 40 Posts
no, you said accounting FTW

so i assumed you mean you are either taking accounting now, or are an accountant.

cause when i said engineering ftw, because im currently in school for mechanical engineering...
baggdis300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:01 AM   #63
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
TRDood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: V
Posts: 7,849
Thanked 656 Times in 326 Posts
Failed 190 Times in 91 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto View Post
Sorry, how is the equation ambiguous? I really don't see how this can be. Is BEDMAS invalidated now that people are plugging numbers into the calculator? What rule are people using to come to the answer 2?
Bracket matter. Try to take the natural log on both sides. See what you get. It really depends on how you look at the equation.
Posted via RS Mobile
TRDood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:03 AM   #64
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: burnabv
Posts: 116
Thanked 564 Times in 54 Posts
Failed 87 Times in 18 Posts
48 ÷ 2(9+3)

48 ÷ 2(12)

48 ÷ 24

2


there's a bracket around the 12, so you would get rid of that first before you divide.

There is only one answer for this the way the OP posted. The only reason people get different answers is because the way their calculators interpret the answer.(Any scientific calculator will get 2)

LOL at how sure presto is about 288 being the answer
blagh is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-12-2011, 11:17 AM   #65
The RS Freebie guru
 
InvisibleSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blagh View Post
48 ÷ 2(9+3)

48 ÷ 2(12)

48 ÷ 24

2


there's a bracket around the 12, so you would get rid of that first before you divide.
No, you only have to do stuff INSIDE brackets first. It's not necessarily so that you have to get rid of brackets.

48 ÷ 2(12) is the same as 48 ÷ 2 x 12.
InvisibleSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:19 AM   #66
Zombie Mod
 
Presto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 9,919
Thanked 5,201 Times in 1,570 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blagh View Post
there's a bracket around the 12, so you would get rid of that first before you divide.
Brackets come first in regards to equations within the brackets, which, in this case, was 9+3. There's no longer any equation within the brackets to deal with. The number 2, next to the bracket just means you multiply 2 by whatever is in there. You just have to look at it like this: 48 / 2 * 12, then apply BEDMAS.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
I stand by my calculator. It was programmed by those with much more math skills than either you or I.
I don't doubt the calculator. The problem here is the operator, and how the data was entered. So, tell me, other than BEDMAS, what is the way to solve this. Again, the equation holds no ambiguity. It can and is solvable with BEDMAS.

The only way you can get this equation:
Quote:
48
___
2(9+3)
is if the original equation (48÷2(9+3)) is written as 48÷(2(9+3))
__________________
Romans 10:9
Presto is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-12-2011, 11:22 AM   #67
In RS I Trust
 
murd0c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mission
Posts: 20,777
Thanked 17,661 Times in 4,345 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by baggdis300 View Post
no, you said accounting FTW

so i assumed you mean you are either taking accounting now, or are an accountant.

cause when i said engineering ftw, because im currently in school for mechanical engineering...
In high school you could take accounting instead of match which I did. Grade 11 one year thats it in order to graduate. I don't deal with math what so ever in my line of work lol
murd0c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:24 AM   #68
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,738
Thanked 5,279 Times in 1,945 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
DON'T IGNORE THE BEDMASSSSS ARGHTGHGHGHGHSAGHG!!!
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:26 AM   #69
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: burnabv
Posts: 116
Thanked 564 Times in 54 Posts
Failed 87 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul View Post
No, you only have to do stuff INSIDE brackets first. It's not necessarily so that you have to get rid of brackets.

48 ÷ 2(12) is the same as 48 ÷ 2 x 12.
your saying that the brackets around the 12 are insignificant and just changing the "( )" to a "x" thus changing the meaning of the equation


48 ÷ 2(12)= 2

(put those into any scientific calculator and you can confirm)

48 ÷ 2 x 12=288

if you cant see why that is true then good luck to you
blagh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:31 AM   #70
Zombie Mod
 
Presto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Langley
Posts: 9,919
Thanked 5,201 Times in 1,570 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blagh View Post
your saying that the brackets around the 12 are insignificant and just changing the "( )" to a "x" thus changing the meaning of the equation


48 ÷ 2(12)= 2

48 ÷ 2 x 12=288

if you cant see why that is true then good luck to you


Back to grade 5 for you:

Order of Operations
Rule 1: First perform any calculations inside parentheses.
Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right.
Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right.


48 ÷ 2(12) =
24(12) = 288
__________________
Romans 10:9
Presto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:37 AM   #71
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: burnabv
Posts: 116
Thanked 564 Times in 54 Posts
Failed 87 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto View Post


Back to grade 5 for you:
Have u finished grade 4 yet?
blagh is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 04-12-2011, 11:42 AM   #72
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
smaggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 638
Thanked 1,212 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 29 Times in 13 Posts
Like someone said before, it's a bad layout of the equation and I haven't seen an actual division sign (can't even find one on my keyboard) in years. If the question had any importance and context of the numbers was known, or how the equation was derived, one could easily figure out how to properly lay it out.

As it is...Presto is correct and the answer is 288, however, the logical way of interpreting the badly laid out equation would get 2
smaggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:47 AM   #73
i like gifs
 
Ch28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: imgur
Posts: 27,179
Thanked 7,785 Times in 2,695 Posts
Failed 4,294,967,295 Times in 169 Posts
holy fuck there are a lot of dumbasses on RS

this is primary school mathematics!
Ch28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 11:52 AM   #74
xxx
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 777 Times in 247 Posts
Failed 58 Times in 27 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto View Post
Sorry, how is the equation ambiguous? I really don't see how this can be. Is BEDMAS invalidated now that people are plugging numbers into the calculator? What rule are people using to come to the answer 2?
it's ambiguous because when someone asks you to interpret 1/2x you don't know whether they mean (1/2)x or 1/(2x). 9 times out of 10 they mean 1/(2x) because the 2 and the x are implied to be together (kinda like the 2(9+3) here) and they are either lazy (bastards!) or don't know how to use brackets to avoid confusion.

I'm not saying interpreting it as 1/(2x) is 'correct'. The first thing I would do is get them to clarify if they mean

(1/2)x or
1/(2x)

that's the proper way to type out the equation to avoid confusion.

Last edited by Oleophobic; 04-12-2011 at 12:00 PM.
Oleophobic is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-12-2011, 11:54 AM   #75
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
xyz123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 514
Thanked 81 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchyzero View Post
I have to be honest here, I forgot what the E in BEDMAS stood for
Exponent =)
xyz123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net