| Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |
|
View Poll Results: 48÷2(9+3) | |
2
|     | 217 | 59.62% | |
288
|    | 147 | 40.38% |
 | | 
04-12-2011, 12:06 PM
|
#76 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,304
Thanked 343 Times in 132 Posts
Failed 319 Times in 77 Posts
| | 
|  | |
04-12-2011, 12:20 PM
|
#77 | | Zombie Mod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Langley
Posts: 9,919
Thanked 5,201 Times in 1,570 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by T.T  it's ambiguous because when someone asks you to interpret 1/2x you don't know whether they mean (1/2)x or 1/(2x). 9 times out of 10 they mean 1/(2x) because the 2 and the x are implied to be together and they are either lazy (bastards!) or don't know how to use brackets to avoid confusion.
I'm not saying interpreting it as 1/(2x) is 'correct'. The first thing I would do is get them to clarify if they mean
(1/2)x or
1/(2x)
that's the proper way to type out the equation to avoid confusion. | I can understand the need for clarification once you start having to solve for 'x', but you kinda lost me on the ambiguity of this thread's particular equation. Though poorly written, it's written in a way that is solvable with conventional means. There's not really any other way to approach it differently, if a person knows the rules.
__________________
Romans 10:9 | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:23 PM
|
#78 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: BC
Posts: 3,558
Thanked 3,814 Times in 957 Posts
Failed 715 Times in 210 Posts
|
rofl at all these debates. Those who have done enough math will naturally think it's 48/2(9+3) and get 2. Those who got numbers other than 2, no amount of explanations will help you.
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:29 PM
|
#79 | | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,337
Thanked 298 Times in 53 Posts
Failed 178 Times in 41 Posts
|
LOL at 68 votes for 2, and how Presto is just repeating the same thing over and over.
__________________
"i'm a nobody , nobody's perfect , therefore im perfect."
"stupidity is not a handicap, park elsewere"
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:37 PM
|
#80 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,567
Thanked 238 Times in 94 Posts
Failed 121 Times in 27 Posts
|
^ we can't fail Mod anyway ... Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 Typed verbatim into my Sharp scientific calculator, It gets 2. | 
__________________
Q: What do you like most in a woman?
A: My dick Quote:
Originally Posted by JL9000 this is the internet and everyone knows better about what happened sitting behind a desk than the people who are actually involved. | | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:42 PM
|
#81 | | Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Surrey
Posts: 12,760
Thanked 689 Times in 376 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 38 Posts
|
everyone here at work including myself say the answer is 288
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:44 PM
|
#82 | | Zombie Mod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Langley
Posts: 9,919
Thanked 5,201 Times in 1,570 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
|
Fuck your calculators. 
Solve it like a child in the 80s. Why don't one of you 71 savants walk me through how you came to the answer of 2?
__________________
Romans 10:9 | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:54 PM
|
#83 | | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,739
Thanked 5,282 Times in 1,946 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
|
Wow with the way Presto is going on about this you'd think we're pissing on his Doctorate of Mathematics paper.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4
A vehicle for all occasions
| |
| | | This post thanked by: | ae101, akalic, buddy, HonestTea, Oleophobic, Sandman, Soundy, SpuGen, taylor192, twitchyzero, ZenZa | |
04-12-2011, 12:57 PM
|
#84 | | Ubereem Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,070
Thanked 120 Times in 63 Posts
Failed 24 Times in 10 Posts
|
THIS THREAD IS EPIC.
Time to ask a bunch of my staff what they get.
Got some Accutaries here. LOL this should be epic.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Culture_Vulture sometimes I like to use kindergarten art class scissors to cut my pubes | | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 12:59 PM
|
#85 | | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
|
48÷2(9+3)
is the same as:
48 ÷ 2 x (9+3)
So:
48 ÷ 2 x 12
24 x 12
288
Yeah?
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count. | | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:05 PM
|
#86 | | :inoutugh:
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: GTA VI
Posts: 10,012
Thanked 5,864 Times in 1,851 Posts
Failed 970 Times in 279 Posts
|
48÷2(9+3) = 42
/thread
__________________
Posted from NE 1-J W Inglis Building | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:20 PM
|
#87 | | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TOS'd 48÷2(9+3) = 42
/thread | The answer is right, but what is the question? 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count. | | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:22 PM
|
#88 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,124
Thanked 9,915 Times in 3,934 Posts
Failed 881 Times in 421 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto Why don't one of you 71 savants walk me through how you came to the answer of 2? | it was posted many times on page one and two. Like i said if you break it down into numerator and denominator you can see why the answer is two.
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:47 PM
|
#89 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto Sorry, how is the equation ambiguous? I really don't see how this can be. Is BEDMAS invalidated now that people are plugging numbers into the calculator? What rule are people using to come to the answer 2? | I wish we could fail mods, especially ones on a power trip. Thankfully, there's at least one member on here that gets it: Quote: |
Originally Posted by T.T it's ambiguous because when someone asks you to interpret 1/2x you don't know whether they mean (1/2)x or 1/(2x). 9 times out of 10 they mean 1/(2x) because the 2 and the x are implied to be together (kinda like the 2(9+3) here) and they are either lazy (bastards!) or don't know how to use brackets to avoid confusion.
I'm not saying interpreting it as 1/(2x) is 'correct'. The first thing I would do is get them to clarify if they mean
(1/2)x or
1/(2x)
that's the proper way to type out the equation to avoid confusion. | Its funny, even with this, some people don't get it: Quote: |
Originally Posted by Presto I can understand the need for clarification once you start having to solve for 'x', but you kinda lost me on the ambiguity of this thread's particular equation. Though poorly written, it's written in a way that is solvable with conventional means. There's not really any other way to approach it differently, if a person knows the rules. | I'll try and break it down into more simple terms for you:
Do you know what a unary operation is? Its an operation with only 1 operand. ie: -3
So what's the outcome of this?
-3^2
it could be:
-(3^2) = -9
(-3)^2 = 9
Cause BEDMAS does not apply to unary operators.
Notice how this equation is missing an operand between the "2" and the "(". We can assume this is an unary operand, in which case it could be expanded to either:
48 / [2 * (9+3)] = 2
48 / (2) * (9+3) = 288
Usually unary operands get evaluated first, anyone who develops software knows this cause "++" is a unary operand. Thus why some calculators are returning the answer as 2.
There's your math lesson for the day.
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:52 PM
|
#90 | | Zombie Mod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Langley
Posts: 9,919
Thanked 5,201 Times in 1,570 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
|
^^^
Why assume anything? As soon as you have to throw in shit like unary to make it work, then you've already missed the point. Solve it like it's presented. Don't assume anything other than what is there. With the information that's presented (the equation), it's solvable by anyone with a grade school education.
__________________
Romans 10:9 | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:54 PM
|
#91 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TOS'd 48÷2(9+3) = 42
/thread | Quoted, to immortalize your stupidity... | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:57 PM
|
#92 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: May 2001 Location: South Central V
Posts: 5,538
Thanked 519 Times in 210 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 21 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo Quoted, to immortalize your stupidity... |
... you just Timpo'd ... you just don't get it.
__________________ Visit my food blog! http://jaxandcs.com/ *its not the size of your army that matters; it's the fury of it's onslaught!* █♣█
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 01:58 PM
|
#93 | | xxx
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,405
Thanked 777 Times in 247 Posts
Failed 58 Times in 27 Posts
|
SpuGen = laughing his ass off right now
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:00 PM
|
#94 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto ^^^
Why assume anything? As soon as you have to throw in shit like unary to make it work, then you've already missed the point. Solve it like it's presented. Don't assume anything other than what is there. With the information that's presented (the equation), it's solvable by anyone with a grade school education. | You cannot solve it as presented. You are assuming "2(" expands to "2 * (" since there is no rule for a bracket being an operator.
I understand where you're coming from, cause yes it is solvable by anyone with JUST a grade school education of BEDMAS. I have 4 years of university math, in particular physics and electronics math that is only solvable with assumptions. Thus my eye is more critical than the simple mind of a grade schooler who is going to assume "2(" expands to "2 * (".
As I pointed out, even my development environment is smart enough to warn me the equation is ambiguous - which is a far cry from grade school math.
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:03 PM
|
#95 | | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
| | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:05 PM
|
#96 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
|
Presto, no hard feelings. This is just the "plane on a conveyor belt" question all over again. We can debate this till the end of time - it all comes down to what assumptions you make.
My 4th year electronics prof never cared if we got the same answer as he did, he cared that we could justify our assumptions getting to our answer.
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:21 PM
|
#97 | | Zombie Mod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Langley
Posts: 9,919
Thanked 5,201 Times in 1,570 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 54 Posts
|
No problem. You mention that there is no rule for bracket being an operator. I've always understood that no operator between the number and bracket means multiplication. Is that where the ambiguity comes from? Due to language of the software?
__________________
Romans 10:9 | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:29 PM
|
#98 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: PM
Posts: 4,479
Thanked 3,349 Times in 843 Posts
Failed 207 Times in 86 Posts
|
I always assumed that meant multiplication. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:40 PM
|
#99 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto I've always understood that no operator between the number and bracket means multiplication. Is that where the ambiguity comes from? | 
That's exactly where the ambiguity comes from. We can solve the ambiguity by figuring out where your understanding comes from. I couldn't find a hard rule about a bracket being a multiply operator - yet if you can, then no more ambiguity.  Yet until you do, your understanding is actually an assumption.  | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 02:47 PM
|
#100 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,824
Thanked 7,318 Times in 647 Posts
Failed 502 Times in 112 Posts
|
math sux
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
