![]() |
i'd like to add my opinion on this matter: FUCK YEAH Posted via RS Mobile |
First, the conservative gov't has declared that there would be no change to the existing drug laws, so I would expect to have a new law in place that meets the requirements of the court ruling. Second, we have a pretty much decriminalized system in place here in Vancouver anyway. A guy in my building is a stoner, and he gets stopped by the police, asked his business, he tells them he has to go for a walk because his landlord won't let him light up inside and off he goes. To switch to a legal system, I see the following: 1. Decrim use Basically what we have...small amounts of personal use pot aren't being charged. 2. Legal cafes, illegal everywhere else. Solves the casual user being criminal issue, does nothing for illicit supply. 3. Full legalization Now you need to devote a lot of effort to deciding who gets to grow and creating a regulatory frame work for them, strengthening the laws surrounding personal grow, as in if you want to use pot, you MUST buy from gov't approved growers**, and then a whole set of laws on where you can use, where you can't, driving offences and so on. I think for that reason alone, you won't see it anytime soon. You'd have to re-write half the criminal code, plus city by-laws. **I wouldn't support any legislation that didn't put a death grip on personal growing, and in that case, you'll have a lot of pot users disappointed with their new supply. |
Quote:
|
i am just happy with the decriminalization, too much to think about actually legalizing it... gonna be the issues with quality, quantity, etc etc lol will be a problem for sure.. aint that easy as people think it is |
Quote:
This raises an interesting point. Some workplaces have 'codes of conduct' which they require their employees to follow. I do believe that these codes of conduct may come in conflict with legalized marijuana. (I'm not certain but) there are probably workplaces out there that allow for marijuana to show up in drug testing if its used for medical reasons. For recreational users, these courtesies are not likely to apply. This puts the workplace in a unique situation because can they discriminate based on a person's personal conduct outside of the workplace with respect to the (hypothetically) recently legalized use of marijuana? I'd say they probably can and despite pushback, it will still be something they can fire people for doing. |
I think what they're going to need is a type of test which determines how much THC is in one's bloodstream at a certain point in time. Quick-acting pot tests (urine? Blood?) are going to have to show up pretty soon. |
Quote:
Probably not the same, but like how some workers are expected to work 12 hour shifts, even though they may want to sleep. If your job requires to you to not have any THC levels, then you should lay off of it until you're on holidays for an extended period of time. I will also venture a guess and say that even though the "law" may decriminalize it, many companies will not change their policies (at least for a while) because of the stereotypes and images that follow weed i.e. stoners. |
I would like to see the thc content level in my blood as well. :fullofwin: Posted via RS Mobile |
^Must be over 9000 |
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net