![]() |
Quote:
QUOTED FOR THE MOTHER FUCKING TRUTH |
Apple Cutie... WTF, seriously, who the hell are you. You've been making stupid comments in the Canucks thread too... Quote:
This season's Canuck team is too magical. It deserves an epic ending. |
^ Triple OT EVEN BETTER :D |
|
Quote:
*covers ears and closes eyes* NAH NAH NAH can't hear you, I WIN NO MATTER WHAT! HA-HA!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
srs bro |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm writing something for CHB right now about how it doesn't matter if we win or lose. Sure, winning would be awesome but win or lose, we're going to talk about these playoffs, love these players and think about what a heck of a ride we went for in 2011. 1994 wasn't a win either. Linden, Bure, McLean, Adams, etc never won a Cup but do you know of a most respected and loved group of people in Vancouver than the '94 Canucks? Trevor could run for mayor tomorrow and win. We don't love '94 because we won. We would love it more if they did but real fans look back at those times fondly because we saw a team that gave it everything they had and came up short. Can't blame them for it...it's the hardest trophy to win in sports. Bandwagoners get angry. Real fans know what they've experienced. This is part of our city's history, it's part of our personal history. If I could kill Tim Thomas tomorrow and be assured that by doing so, the Canucks would win the Stanley Cup, I might be tempted but I wouldn't do it. There would be no meaning to winning like that. The Cup is about being the best by beating the best. Calling in a bomb threat or whatever isn't beating anyone. Anything but playing hard on that ice is just silly. We win this straight up or else it isn't winning, it's just holding a really heavy hunk of silver over your head. |
You're writing an article for Captain Happy Bubble? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When Canucks are like 1 for 20 or something like that. Not to mention Canucks let in 2 short handed goals... Boston hasn't exactly been destroying us with PPG's either. So it's not like they're getting all advantage. Maybe in the Chicago series... but blaming refs now... I find that just whining. There's going to be missed calls on both sides, but being "1 for 20" or "1 for 30" isn't going to make a difference. Your point would be more valid if Canucks can actually set up and generate scoring chances on the PP... but I haven't been seeing any of that. |
If the Canucks want the cheap shots and scrums to stop, they gotta do one of two things. 1. Score on the PP. Make them pay on the scoreboard. A bruise or two is worth it. 2. Get more physical than them. Probably not doable with injuries mounting but if they're going to play dirty, play even dirtier! You can blame the refs all you want but the Canucks got chances to score. They didn't score on them. Can't rely on the refs to call the game properly so you have to beat the Bruins in spite of them. This is the Cup Final...all this should be expected. |
Which is why beating Tim Thomas would be incredible. Kesler Said is right Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I have thanked you and failed you. Thank you for making me feel better about the idiots I work with. |
|
he's too much fails |
Quote:
Quote:
You and me both. Can you actually use retardation as an excuse for a ban? |
Canucks are goin DOWN! :2finger2: Boston is gunna take the cup! :fuckyea: |
^ WORD. :fuckyea: |
wow... 350+ fails... thats an avg of 14 fails in each of those 24 posts... damn |
If I could, I'd fail you OP |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net