REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2011, 01:25 PM   #26
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
lol not going to happen
Posted via RS Mobile
Advertisement
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 01:34 PM   #27
My homepage has been set to RS
 
dachinesedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,224
Thanked 1,207 Times in 432 Posts
Failed 203 Times in 83 Posts
oh boy the hippies are NOT gonna like this!

as much as i want this to happen, i dont see it happening
dachinesedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 02:50 PM   #28
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Maple Ridge
Posts: 654
Thanked 279 Times in 95 Posts
Failed 47 Times in 13 Posts
I would envision insurance costs for cyclist would be to cover pedestrians and other road vehicles, not specifically to cover the cyclists bike, although I assume that would be an option. My car has been hit by a cyclist before, would be nice to have them have to pay for it through ICBC.

With the above said, as in my original post, I would love to see how he would plan on implementing this. I don’t see it being that big of an issue, tossing money at ICBC, I’m sure they would be excited and try to make it work, but I’m also not aware of all the red tape that would need to be looked at so I can’t say for sure.

For me I’m more interested in a licensing program and license plates to identify cyclists. This would take away the “anonymous” mentality, and hopefully cut down on the assholes out there, and make it safer for the people who ride properly.

Again though, just trying to imagine how the above would be policed, and I’m not sure I see it working out. I support the idea though and would love to see more research into it. I believe somewhere in Europe just started requiring bikes to have licenses and registration, cant find on line where though……

As for the sea wall question, for me, I would say yes. It’s a small area with generally “higher” traffic and potential for accidents. Don’t I remember reading about several pedestrians being hit by cyclists on the sea wall just this last summer? I’m pretty sure one was a child, and one was an older man who actually ended up dying from his injuries.
91civicZC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 03:13 PM   #29
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
gearshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 933
Thanked 288 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 23 Posts
I support this idea, but while the idea is interesting, if a kid say like 6 who wants to ride a bicycle...
I doubt parents would insure their kids just so they can ride a bike for those few days of the season. Even temporary 1 day insurances are hard to justify... Kids wouldn't be riding bikes at all then?

As much as I like it, this is not going to work.
gearshifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 03:17 PM   #30
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Anjew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 925
Thanked 237 Times in 102 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 31 Posts
places that have a predominantly larger ridership using bicycles have licensing systems in place like china.... its not meant to couple with insurance but its meant for tracking and liabilities.. which i'm all for. way too many stupid cyclist to justify this.
Anjew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 03:20 PM   #31
MiX iT Up!
 
tiger_handheld's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,150
Thanked 2,075 Times in 871 Posts
Failed 642 Times in 183 Posts
bike insurance + transponders on bike lanes = WIN.
__________________

Sometimes we tend to be in despair when the person we love leaves us, but the truth is, it's not our loss, but theirs, for they left the only person who couldn't give up on them.


Make the effort and take the risk..

"Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." - Eleanor Roosevelt
tiger_handheld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 03:42 PM   #32
RS controls my life!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 722
Thanked 599 Times in 165 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 69 Posts
Suzanna Anton's promises are retarded so far. "Oh lets spend more taxpayer dollars on a useless tram that only tourists will use" Waste of space she is.

Gregor has my vote because he is a bro, but I'm really hoping he someday makes this bike license and insurance thing mandatory and punishable by law. Lots of people bitch about the idea because they don't seem to understand why it is necessary. People are saying "It will cause less cyclist traffic" Why? It's not like it's going to cost 500$ to get a bicycle license. It will obviously be a written test and the insurance would doubtfully be more then 10$ a month. And it would only apply to people who ride in busy heavily traffic filled areas. So it wouldn't apply to people riding on residential streets and paths(Hopefully). And if that were to be the case, then maybe more people would stop using the major roads and use the designated bike roads adjacent to almost every major route in this city. And if the insurance covered Theft it would be the best insurance you could possibly have(Although it would be highly unlikely and probably cost triple and be a waste of claim adjusters time.)
Everymans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 03:51 PM   #33
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
silva95teg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Coquitlam BC
Posts: 1,265
Thanked 94 Times in 48 Posts
Failed 30 Times in 8 Posts
I also agree with it, if they are using the road they should be insured. Also if possible some of that cost can go to maintaining the bike lanes that were put in for them.
silva95teg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 04:47 PM   #34
I have named my kids VIC and VLS
 
Hondaracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,234
Thanked 15,959 Times in 6,493 Posts
Failed 2,158 Times in 740 Posts
In the surrey now today a cyclist who fell off his bike and broke his thumb after being clipped by a car was awarded $136,000
Posted via RS Mobile
Hondaracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 04:49 PM   #35
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,056
Thanked 1,100 Times in 259 Posts
Failed 480 Times in 86 Posts
I have never been interested in voting or gave half a shit as who wins, but god dammit im gonna go and vote for him.
__________________
Current
2010 Mustang GT 4.6
1998 S10 2.2
Previous
1977 Firebird 5.7
1987 Iroc-Z 2.5
1998 Firebird 3.8
1992 BMW 325i 2.5
1994 Dodge Ram 5.2
1996 Dodge Ram 5.9
1996 Cavalier Z22 2.2
1997 Mustang Cobra 4.6
firebird79_00 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 10-12-2011, 05:03 PM   #36
I subscribe to Revscene
 
dat_steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,911
Thanked 849 Times in 367 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 9 Posts
interesting concept, but implementation will be a challenge
see also: mandatory helmet law
dat_steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 07:16 PM   #37
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: burnaby
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 642 Times in 217 Posts
Failed 269 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer View Post
In the surrey now today a cyclist who fell off his bike and broke his thumb after being clipped by a car was awarded $136,000
Posted via RS Mobile
$70,000 Non-Pecuniary Damages for Thumb Joint Injury | ICBC Personal Injury Claims Lawyer Erik Magraken | Victoria & Vancouver Island BC
PornMaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 07:31 PM   #38
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: n zone
Posts: 2,660
Thanked 1,910 Times in 606 Posts
Failed 325 Times in 112 Posts
dont most of u hate icbc...this will just give them another source of revenue.
Sid Vicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 07:34 PM   #39
(╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
 
Tim Budong's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,136
Thanked 11,234 Times in 2,298 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
anyone remember just riding a bike around afterschool in and our of the neighbourhood?
or what about riding a tricycle around the complex..
or what if I just ride on the seawall and be done...

tough to implement
will be met with stupid opinions. like the HST
Tim Budong is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 10-12-2011, 07:39 PM   #40
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Mercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 611
Thanked 133 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 13 Posts
What about the 10 year old kid biking home from school gonna make him pay? Gonna make his parents pay? How's that gonna work?
Posted via RS Mobile
Mercy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 10-12-2011, 07:58 PM   #41
UFO
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Van, BC
Posts: 3,666
Thanked 728 Times in 435 Posts
Failed 33 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pure.life View Post
Not only that.. I hate it when they take over the road when next to it is an empty sidewalk they don't use, backing up all traffic during rush hour.
You realize its illegal to ride a bike on the sidewalk right? You should take your car out of the traffic jam caused by this cyclist and drive it on the empty sidewalk.

I'm peeved by cyclists who ride on main roads and streets when there are designated bike routes a few blocks away designed for cyclists' safety with decreased car traffic volume. I stay out of designated bike routes because I know there will be lots of annoying bikes blocking me, and I would expect cyclists try and stay off main roads to stay away from heavy traffic. I cycle commute occasionally and its actually a pretty nice system of bike friendly routes set up throughout the city.

The costs needed to insure cyclists would never fly, the program would not be sustainable.
UFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 08:07 PM   #42
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Jgresch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PM
Posts: 4,479
Thanked 3,349 Times in 843 Posts
Failed 207 Times in 86 Posts
lol homeless people will be fucked.
Jgresch is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 10-12-2011, 08:45 PM   #43
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,310
Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
Failed 771 Times in 208 Posts
The seawall in stanley park is dangerous as fuck. You combine clueless tourists with jockhead idiots racing their buddies on a TIGHT bike lane, while dodging old fogeys and clueless bitches prancing around in high heels thinking the world revolves around them.... yeah
Quote:
Originally Posted by mx703 View Post
does the sea wall count as downtown?
because needing a license/insurance to ride that would be pretty annoying... And a waste of money for people that only ride the sea wall a few times a year like I do...
Death2Theft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 08:50 PM   #44
RS controls my life!
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 722
Thanked 599 Times in 165 Posts
Failed 291 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthchilli View Post
anyone remember just riding a bike around afterschool in and our of the neighbourhood?
or what about riding a tricycle around the complex..
or what if I just ride on the seawall and be done...

tough to implement
will be met with stupid opinions. like the HST
It's for people who ride their bikes with traffic. And I think the main purpose is to hold cyclists accountable for laws they break while cycling so they can stop avoiding legal loopholes in car related incidents.
Everymans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 08:50 PM   #45
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,310
Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
Failed 771 Times in 208 Posts
Have selective patrolling where you know it matters. Around downtown hire 3 guys to hand out at least 5 times their daily wage in the amount of fines. Depending on how/if they meet the quota add or remove one each week.
In less busy areas one guy per area and if they can meet the quota keep him and if not reassign to diff/busy area.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MindBomber View Post
The candidate is clueless.

The mayor of Vancouver is not the head of ICBC, if he were elected, which won't happen, nothing would change. ICBC will not insure cyclists now or ever, the cost of implementing and operating the program would almost definitely exceed the annual revenue generated by it, and it will drive cyclists off the road which is counter productive to the objectives of Translink and the majority of greater Vancouver mayors. Not to mention that it would be almost impossible to define what streets require a license and which ones do not, if someone has a reasonable suggestion on how that could be done please tell me.

I support the concept of licensing cyclists, but I realize it's not practical.
Death2Theft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 08:57 PM   #46
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
hirevtuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,206
Thanked 188 Times in 83 Posts
Failed 148 Times in 32 Posts
if we would pay for insurance for bikes, i would vote it if it includes theft as so many bikes gets stolen each year other than that, it is a bad idea
hirevtuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 09:02 PM   #47
Returner of Lost Phones and Turtles
 
LP700-4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,117
Thanked 3,997 Times in 963 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hirevtuner View Post
if we would pay for insurance for bikes, i would vote it if it includes theft as so many bikes gets stolen each year other than that, it is a bad idea
If they want us to pay for insurance like cars its only fair if we get the same insurance coverage as cars..... right?
LP700-4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 09:16 PM   #48
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Death2Theft View Post
Have selective patrolling where you know it matters. Around downtown hire 3 guys to hand out at least 5 times their daily wage in the amount of fines. Depending on how/if they meet the quota add or remove one each week.
In less busy areas one guy per area and if they can meet the quota keep him and if not reassign to diff/busy area.
ICBC operates at a profit because the average cost to insure a vehicle is $1500-2000 per year and the vast majority of individuals drive, whereas the maximum reasonable annual fee for insuring a bicycle would be $100-150 per year with a fraction of the customer base. Therefore, profit margins would be slimmer and the customer base smaller for bicycles compared to motorized vehicles. On top of that, ICBC needs to design, equip and implement a licensing and insurance program for cyclists.

Even ignoring the fact that the majority of people in government will not support placing what would be perceived as burdens on cyclists, since the long term goal is to increase the number of riders, and ignoring the issues with defining who needs to license and insure, it would never be profitable. If it's not profitable, ICBC won't agree to it.
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2011, 12:20 PM   #49
Glorious Gaming PC Master Race
 
Psykopathik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Coquitlam y0!
Posts: 21,240
Thanked 968 Times in 446 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 30 Posts
ill put 1 training wheel on my bike and call it a tricycle.

but seriously Cyclists should be made to get a license if they are going to ride on the road. 90% ignore all the laws then freak out when we almost smoke them.
__________________
My 100+ Buy and Sell feedback
Psykopathik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2011, 12:40 PM   #50
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
Nightwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
It's a ridiculous idea, pretty dumb.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count.
Nightwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net