REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   Ferrari accident on boundary (https://www.revscene.net/forums/656274-ferrari-accident-boundary.html)

InvisibleSoul 10-27-2011 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmmk (Post 7631151)
First off, the people who run yellows may be going too fast to stop.

That's why he specifically said STALE yellows.

If you run a stale yellow, then you're going WAY too fast and/or have reactions so slow you shouldn't be driving, and/or are distracted.

freakshow 10-27-2011 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmmk (Post 7631151)
First off, the people who run yellows may be going too fast to stop.
The only assholes are the ones running the red.

First off, that's not true at all, they can be the ones running late yellows also. You *might* be going to fast to stop, but I bet a lot of people are speeding up to make the light.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmmk (Post 7631151)
In every case, yes EVERY SINGLE CASE, the person making the left can control whether there is an accident or not.
It is the poor judgement of the car turning left which causes accidents.

So good for you that you won your case, but please don't tell everyone turning left here that they are good to turn
when the light is stale yellow or red, assuming they can fight it after they get hit!

Obviously he's not telling people to purposely take a chance at getting t-boned and killed. No one thinks that. Yes, it can be prevented by the left-turner, but that certainly doesn't make the person going straight innocent. He's saying, if you're getting screwed over by someone who sped up or ran a red, you CAN fight it, don't just give in to ICBC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmmk (Post 7631151)
My advice: Don't turn until it's safe...green, yellow, or red.

O RLY?

mmmk 10-27-2011 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakshow (Post 7631392)
First off, that's not true at all, they can be the ones running late yellows also. You *might* be going to fast to stop, but I bet a lot of people are speeding up to make the light.

Please don't assume that people are doing that. If you run a late yellow, I'm sure you wouldn't want people to assume you are purposely speeding up to make the light.

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakshow (Post 7631392)
O RLY?

I was joking. I just turn when I feel like it.
:thumbs:

XplicitLuder 10-27-2011 06:33 PM

not a ferrari but i believe there was another accident today on boundary and 1st ave, i work at autohaus and there were firetrucks, ambulance, police at the intersection..and i bet its because someone was turning and the other person was tryin to beat the yellow light. I always see things like that in that intersection..its scary how many times i see it

Atlantis 10-27-2011 08:45 PM

ferrari is at fault, unless the ferrari can prove it was a red he ran. thats how i totalled my STi, same location, same crash. same icbc outcome, driver turning left is at fault.

Raid3n 10-27-2011 09:44 PM

timed it on my way home tonight. now provided they don't change the delays based on time of day, from boundary going yellow to moscrop going green is between 5-7 seconds.

Leopold Stotch 10-28-2011 09:31 AM

^ that's an incredibly long delay, normally it's like 2-3 seconds

InvisibleSoul 10-28-2011 09:45 AM

Should have timed it from when the light goes red and the other light goes green.

doma 10-30-2011 12:42 PM

I drive through this everyday, the truck most definitely ran a red.

RRxtar 10-30-2011 01:01 PM

I know "the guy turning left is always at fault" is a common belief, but there is a grey area alot of people dont know about. a friend of mine was in an identical situation as this but he was the truck not the Ferrari.

in some situations, if two vehicles enter a yellow light, regardless of whether one is turning left or not, the one who enters the yellow first has the right of way. so if the ferrari was sitting in the yellow waiting for his turn, and the truck entered the yellow while the farrari was there, the truck could be at fault.

my friend was fount 100% at fault when he hit a guy turning left. they were both running yellows, my buddy was going straight, the other guy was running a yellow turning left, but my buddy ran the yellow after the other guy.

snowball 10-31-2011 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doma (Post 7669720)
I drive through this everyday, the truck most definitely ran a red.

me too, i drive by there 2-3 times a day on weekdays, that truck definitely ran a red, i've almost been hit there too; it's the worst when a car almost stops completely then at the last second decides they're gonna run it.

spoonek4 10-31-2011 10:52 AM

Hate it when u're at a tough position and u get hit by some idiot...then ICBC tells u oh that's TOO BAD so sad u're at fault kinda thing. Who knows if they're saying the same thing to the other party too!?

twitchyzero 10-31-2011 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRxtar (Post 7669732)
in some situations, if two vehicles enter a yellow light, regardless of whether one is turning left or not, the one who enters the yellow first has the right of way. so if the ferrari was sitting in the yellow waiting for his turn, and the truck entered the yellow while the farrari was there, the truck could be at fault.

my friend was fount 100% at fault when he hit a guy turning left. they were both running yellows, my buddy was going straight, the other guy was running a yellow turning left, but my buddy ran the yellow after the other guy.

if that's the case 90%+ of the time left turners would not be at fault as they were already sitting in the intersection the whole time waiting for the light to to turn yellow/red.

Rich Sandor 11-01-2011 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmmk (Post 7631151)
First off, the people who run yellows may be going too fast to stop.
The only assholes are the ones running the red.

If you're doing 75kph in a 50kph zone and you can't stop for a yellow, guess what: you're an asshole too.

Quote:

In every case, yes EVERY SINGLE CASE, the person making the left can control whether there is an accident or not.
It is the poor judgement of the car turning left which causes accidents.
First of all: No, not in "every single case" is it completely in the control of the left turner.

Remember, you may not enter an intersection if it is unclear. The same way a left hand turner may not start a turn without ensuring the way is clear, straight through traffic must not enter intersections without ensuring the way is clear too. Just because you have a green light, doesn't mean you can run into anything that is in your way.

Quote:

So good for you that you won your case, but please don't tell everyone turning left here that they are good to turn
when the light is stale yellow or red, assuming they can fight it after they get hit!
In my situation, I won because there was no way anyone could have known the guy was going to run the red. He actually got on the brakes, you could see the nose of the van drop down, and he had almost completely come to a stop before the light, then he suddenly changed his mind and ran the red.

I raised my case because I'm sure there are other people who are victims of red light runners on a left turn. They should not be found 100% responsible when the other person has run a red light.

Quote:

My advice: Don't turn until it's safe...green, yellow, or red.
Good advice, except you may THINK it's safe, and still get hit by someone who's not paying attention. Better advice is to drive like as if NOBODY around you is paying attention. Assume that everyone is an idiot and is trying to drive into you.

Raid3n 11-01-2011 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul (Post 7632369)
Should have timed it from when the light goes red and the other light goes green.

that wouldn't be good enough, we wanted to see if he had enough warning to stop in time. the change over from red on boundary to green on moscrop was less than a second i believe.

CP.AR 11-04-2011 07:47 AM

any updates on this?

Redlines_Daily 11-09-2011 04:10 PM

Update:

The truck was found 100% at fault. The Ferrari driver called me today to share the good news. He told me that Testarossa is very rare because it was the first year of production on that model and it was not for sale in Canada(or north america, not sure). There are only about 50 of them left in the world..he hopes to replace it with the exact same year and model as this car was very special to him. We are meeting up this weekend, he said he has a gift for me..I told him to forget the gift and just take me for a ride when he gets his new ferrari :fuckyea:, but he insists on giving me something, sooo..if a rich Ferrari owner wants to give me a gift, who am I to refuse hehe :D

Dragon-88 11-09-2011 04:15 PM

So i'm guessing the ticket the Ferrari guy got was voided?

subordinate 11-09-2011 04:23 PM

Goodjob Redline, Hope the present is awesome! Well-deserved

LuHua 11-09-2011 04:40 PM

Good on you! Hope you still get that ride haha. Nice to hear that we'll probably still get to see a Testarossa rolling around

freakshow 11-09-2011 04:42 PM

nice work! looks like that camera is about to pay for itself!

JayEch 11-09-2011 04:48 PM

time to get a camera :D

ZordosZZ 11-09-2011 04:49 PM

Wow i wonder how much the truck owner's insurance is gonna shoot up.

sekin67835 11-09-2011 04:55 PM

Props to op for saving that guys ass. These accidents are very hard to deal with.
Posted via RS Mobile

Raid3n 11-09-2011 05:44 PM

if they are that rare, i wonder if it's the same one that caught fire going up the cut on the north shore the year before last when we were heading out for a cruise/meet to murrin lake...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net