![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, never said my generation was better. In fact, we are probably to blame for the newer generations' problems. This current generation may be the first to not do better than the previous generation. You make it sound like I am talkiing about your generation..... Call me old fart all you want, young cunt. |
very impressive story. Seems like the lacking thing these days is motivation and she has a lot of intrinsic motivation driving her which is great to see. In highschool i was more worried about doing the worked needed to get A's and nothing more. Spent the rest of my time playin ball or hanging out. It's not till now that I find research articles more and more interesting. I guess she just found what interests her at an earlier age than most. And for all of you comparing last generation stats with this generation, the comparison of stats will not get you anywhere because the circumstances aren't the same. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The idea is so...primitive...how could they not have thought of this before LOL. Conclusion: Although smart (her university career), I don't really think she's a super genius, just above average asian :pokerface: |
^Talked to a friend in the profession about it and he said while it's impressive she did research at the age of 17, it's nothing new and most likely not gonna be "the cure for cancer" as hyped up by the media. There's probably a thousand type of cancer, and then you're talking about relapse, resistant, metastasis, etc. Maybe that's why she's still going to school normally LOL. You would think if there was indeed a cure, the US government would jump on it way before the media with all the classified shits you won't even know her family exist. |
Quote:
i'm part of the generation too :failed:, and we've got tons of 13 year-old LGs using a variety of drugs, packin on the make-up & flaunting their undeveloped bodies the effects of peer pressure and society :\ i'm embarrassed lol but like every generation, we all have our fair share of prodigies |
^ thing is, it's the parents. There are a lot of great parents out there. Parents who are involved in their children's daily lives make a huge difference. In fact, those kids are miles ahead of any kid from my generation. Never before has information been so readily available - technology. If anything, we are experiencing a, have/have not situation with the gap getter wider and wider. |
Every time I look back to high school grad year, I notice that there were less "bright" kids in the younger grades, especially in the Grade 10 Socials class I peer tutored. It was kind of appalling at the level of stupidity some of these kids had (ie. believing in the Illuminati and focusing on starting a rap career), but there were a few kids that knew their shit and their parents are probably the reason why in both cases. Not that hard to tell which group had the most parental involvement. When I graduated, I could count how many students smoked on two hands. Last time I paid a visit to my old teachers the following September, I saw a group of 12-15 students on the corner passing out Belmonts to each other. Even with the availability of online resources, the opposite can happen if it's used. What if something that no online parenting article covers comes up for the parents? They can call theirs for advice, but then again wouldn't it make a bit of sense to try something they came up with themselves? Although I can't relate since I'm not a parent myself, the pragmatist in me thinks a mix of online resources and trial-and-error makes sense in raising a kid. It's possible to be a super-parent with online resources, but then again, I'm thinking it's the Internet that raised that kid, not the parents themselves. |
I predict these kids will turn out fine and when they get old, they will be bitching about the next generation. Before, it was rock n roll, then TV, then rap music, then video games, then the internet, and now it's social media and how's it gonna ruin the kids. OMG, it's something I don't understand so it must be bad! C'mon, we've heard it all before and they have a history of being wrong each time. So what's different this time? Socio-economic problems are not new. |
should send this girl to do her human testing in some left-wing nation, then until there are confirmed results i'm hanging out with this guy http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/ph..._smith__1_.jpg |
that's amazing |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What if the world lost ALL power one day? The new generation, atleast 70-100% of them, would be ENTIRELY FUCKED. It's kind of funny how normal things like math, and writing could easily be abolished because we have tablets to write on, and calculators that can do the work for us. But if that technology were to ever fail, it would be fun to see. (Even though I'd have to go back to hand drafting my drawings.. :okay: ) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not critizing "real world skills" I'm saying that soon, my kid won't know how to use a god damn pencil, because he'll want to use an iPad to type on. Fact: http://venturebeat.com/2011/10/26/aa...let-exclusive/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Just saying.. :troll: *waits for a Fire-Sail* |
Quote:
But all this assumes ppl can't ever adapt to technology or building a camp, etc, which is false. |
Quote:
Maybe you're just bitter that you didn't do anything more than watch pokemon in highschool, but I think you have to give her a bit more than 'above average'. |
Girl got $100, 000.00 because she shows promise. Thinks outside the box, has drive, quick learner, high crtical thinking skills, etc. As for the purple shoes....... love it. Shows she's down to earth and not some weirdo, mad scientist type. ====================================== Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Domains |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net