REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-31-2012, 03:29 PM   #1
I subscribe to Revscene
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
Driving ban against alleged Ferrari street racer overturned

Quote:
One of the drivers who was banned from driving following an alleged high-speed street race involving 13 high-end sports cars last summer has had his suspension lifted.

In August last year, Cheng Jie Wang was issued a traffic violation ticket after the vehicles were pulled over by RCMP.

[...]
Article link
Advertisement
__________________
Consider reading the research before commenting on photo enforcement: http://thenewspaper.com/

Support Road safety through education, not speed enforcement.
sebberry is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-31-2012, 03:47 PM   #2
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Infiniti
Posts: 2,457
Thanked 2,121 Times in 669 Posts
xilley is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-05-2012, 12:57 PM   #3
look at these diamonds, they shining
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,800
Thanked 1,813 Times in 553 Posts
O well no evidence right?
Posted via RS Mobile
Drow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 03:26 PM   #4
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 858
Thanked 1,070 Times in 229 Posts
Quote:
But it is “still the law” that we sanction people for what we can prove they have done, rather than for what we suspect they may be a part of, the judge concluded.
and thats really all you need to know about this. our justice system is here for a reason.
Shorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 03:48 PM   #5
I help report spam so I got this! <--
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,867
Thanked 1,215 Times in 535 Posts
The way the law should be. Move on, nothing to see here.
Nlkko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 07:01 PM   #6
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
cococly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Van
Posts: 1,664
Thanked 413 Times in 101 Posts
The driver of the 599 should also be getting his car back from the impound lot.
cococly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 08:08 AM   #7
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
For anyone that thinks this is "justice", I posted this in the other thread:

Ottawa teen convicted in deadly street racing case - Ottawa - CBC News

Witnesses testified to override the statements of those involved that they were doing 50kmph when in fact they were doing 100+kmph.

If the witnesses had testified in this case, the judge hopefully would have ruled differently. Its not like it was one witness out to get a bunch of kids, there were several witnesses, who unfortunately chose not to testify.

If you do agree this is "justice" then the other drive does not deserve to have his suspension lifted. He filed late, that's how our system works.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-06-2012, 05:01 PM   #8
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
MK-EK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 373
Thanked 772 Times in 87 Posts
dont impound the Ferraris they didn't do anything wrong!
i say free the Ferraris (revscene charity raffle LOL) but keep those guys locked up ....
MK-EK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 07:44 PM   #9
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Gnomes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,360
Thanked 659 Times in 201 Posts
13 drivers allegedly sped through a busy stretch of highway. How many eye witness who was driving 80km/h saw the cars zoomed by them and dialed 911? The cops did not act on ONE phone call. They acted upon x-number of calls from callers who are not related to one another. Question is - how many callers where there?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSALES View Post
While driving yesterday I saw a banana peel in the road and instinctively swerved to avoid it...thanks Mario Kart.
Gnomes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 08:27 PM   #10
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
fetched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 225 Times in 62 Posts
Some of the comments that made sense
Quote:
Misterbill, just another example of someone who's missed the boat.

If the witnesses won't give their name or have a license plate # or accurate description of a vehicle what use are they? The police themselves didn't witness anything.

I can get 20 people to call the police anonymously and complain that a guy that looks like you just robbed the 7-11. Of course we didn't see your face or have any pictures or fingerprints or even an accurate description of what you were wearing .

I suppose you'd just go to jail without a fight eh? We wouldn't want to bother the officers with something so trivial as PROOVING that it was you.
Quote:
Good call by the judge. The issue of spoiled young kids has nothing to do with this. This is about police arbitrarily confiscating cars and selling them off and suspending people's licenses at will. How messed up is this? You speed, without even getting into an accident and will get your Lambo taken away and sold off. That's a $200,000 fine for speeding. You go downtown and cause thousands of dollars in damagesin a riot and won't likely have to repay a penny to the business owners. I guess it's easier for our province to take people's property away at will rather than going after real criminals.
Quote:
Dear Parents of this driver. You have hired the lawyer and paid your son's fees and now he will be able to proceed as though nothing happened that day. Good for you. However, what lesson have you taught him? Car accidents are the number one killer of our young males and regardless of the legal bits your son was involved in an incident that proves he is not responsible enough for such a high performance car. So will he continue to drive it? Are you that willing to put his "Coolness" before his life? Do you feel our society needs such a driver on the road? How will you handle the civil suits if he kills someone other than himself? What message do you send your child when you enable him to participate in such a dangerous activity? My son wants a Mustang but he is driving a 12 year old solid car until he has the experience and MATURITY to handle anything else. Because I love my child more than him wanting to look cool.
fetched is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-06-2012, 08:30 PM   #11
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
I like #3.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 07:25 AM   #12
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
I hate #1. Only someone "not so smart" would believe in conspiracy theories where multiple people conspire to call 911 with the same description at the same time.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 08:30 AM   #13
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Soundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
What I find really amusing (from reading the other thread on this topic) is the assertion that NOBODY who witnessed and phoned in the event could possibly have been competent enough to know how fast these drivers were going, let alone that they were racing or weaving or blocking other traffic... and yet, if you ask around this car-oriented forum, I don't think you'll find one person who doesn't think they're perfectly able to tell how fast another car is going.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira View Post
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta View Post
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Soundy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-07-2012, 04:03 PM   #14
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Gnomes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,360
Thanked 659 Times in 201 Posts
^my point exactly. Say I am driving 100km/hr and a car beside me passes by me at amazing speed...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSALES View Post
While driving yesterday I saw a banana peel in the road and instinctively swerved to avoid it...thanks Mario Kart.
Gnomes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 06:40 PM   #15
I subscribe to Revscene
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
Let's say you happen to be driving an R8, Aston, etc.. responsibly in the vicinity of these alleged street racers. They blow past at twice your speed and unknown to you take the next exit which is still out of sight.

Several 911 calls are made to report exotic cars "racing eachother". Some licence plates are recorded and passed on to police, some not.

You, driving responsibly in your exotic car takes the same exit the racers took a few minutes earlier. The police are now on the case and have started rounding up exotic cars on roads fed by the highway exit you just took.

Nope, not going to look bad at all....
__________________
Consider reading the research before commenting on photo enforcement: http://thenewspaper.com/

Support Road safety through education, not speed enforcement.
sebberry is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-07-2012, 06:44 PM   #16
Marcosexual Fan Club, CEO
 
Marco911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: US Bush-country
Posts: 7,741
Thanked 823 Times in 284 Posts
These drivers were charged with minor traffic offenses, not criminal offenses. You can charge someone based on witness testimony but if the ticket is disputed, you can't convict unless the witness is able to show up in court. When you have multiple witnesses without specific evidence or in some cases contradictory evidence, you really don't have much of a case. We live in a country where there is a rule of law and the burden of proof is rightly on the prosecution side. I for one am pleased that justice has prevailed.
__________________
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.
Marco911 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-07-2012, 07:49 PM   #17
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Soundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Relax, Marco, nobody considers a C4S to be an "exotic" so there's no chance of you getting accidentally lumped in.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira View Post
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta View Post
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Soundy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-07-2012, 08:17 PM   #18
I help report spam so I got this! <--
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,867
Thanked 1,215 Times in 535 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundy View Post
What I find really amusing (from reading the other thread on this topic) is the assertion that NOBODY who witnessed and phoned in the event could possibly have been competent enough to know how fast these drivers were going, let alone that they were racing or weaving or blocking other traffic... and yet, if you ask around this car-oriented forum, I don't think you'll find one person who doesn't think they're perfectly able to tell how fast another car is going.
I side with the police most of the time but have to disagree on this.

It doesn't matter if you or I know how fast they were going. We are not professionally trained and our statement should NEVER be allowed to use as CONCLUSIVE evidence to take away somebody else's property. You can give them a ticket, fine. But take away their property? That's pretty serious stuffs. What CAN and CANNOT be used as evidence in court matters. Once a verdict is delivered, it's used as reference for judges in future case. Do you cringe at the possibility of any one person being able to report you for whatever stuffs you didn't do and you can your car crushed? Our system of law, or pretty much anywhere else in the world, would rather let the guilty off than hang the wrong person. And it should be that way.

Also I believed they were charged in a civil court, in which the burden of proof is substantially lighter than in criminal court. The fact the judges tossed the case shows you how weak the evidence is.
Nlkko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 04:55 AM   #19
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Also I believed they were charged in a civil court, in which the burden of proof is substantially lighter than in criminal court. The fact the judges tossed the case shows you how weak the evidence is.[/QUOTE]


Police don't charge anyone for civil court, it must be for criminal, treaffic court etc. I'm not aware that you were provided with the reason that the charges were stayed? Could you provide us with a copy of the decision? There are many reasons that a "judge" could dismiss the charges and not having enough evidence to prove a charge is only one of them. Lots of technical legal reasons, witesses that don't show etc...
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 01:54 PM   #20
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nlkko View Post
It doesn't matter if you or I know how fast they were going. We are not professionally trained and our statement should NEVER be allowed to use as CONCLUSIVE evidence to take away somebody else's property.
I posted a case where it was. In Canada that case becomes case law, thus our law now states that untrained witnesses are capable of telling the difference between 50 kmph and 100 kmph.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nlkko View Post
What CAN and CANNOT be used as evidence in court matters.
An Ontario judge just ruled that untrained witness testimony can be used.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nlkko View Post
Once a verdict is delivered, it's used as reference for judges in future case.
So you know how case law works, good. Review the case I posted and see what happens when witnesses actually step forward, unlike this case where it seems none testified.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 01:56 PM   #21
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebberry View Post
Let's say you happen to be driving an R8, Aston, etc.. responsibly in the vicinity of these alleged street racers. They blow past at twice your speed and unknown to you take the next exit which is still out of sight.

Several 911 calls are made to report exotic cars "racing eachother". Some licence plates are recorded and passed on to police, some not.

You, driving responsibly in your exotic car takes the same exit the racers took a few minutes earlier. The police are now on the case and have started rounding up exotic cars on roads fed by the highway exit you just took.

Nope, not going to look bad at all....
I have a tin foil hat for you.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 02:05 PM   #22
I subscribe to Revscene
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 View Post
I have a tin foil hat for you.
Explain how the situation I described couldn't happen.
__________________
Consider reading the research before commenting on photo enforcement: http://thenewspaper.com/

Support Road safety through education, not speed enforcement.
sebberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 02:48 PM   #23
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,608
Thanked 170 Times in 87 Posts
If they blew by you at twice the speed you were going, then by the time you drive by where they get caught, you 'should' have arrived late enough that they would not lump you in with them. If you arrived soon enough to be rounded up by the cops, then you would have been going quite fast yourself to be able to almost catch up to them.
wing_woo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 03:15 PM   #24
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebberry View Post
Explain how the situation I described couldn't happen.
The government can read your brain waves. You might want to protect yourself from this possibility.
taylor192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2012, 11:03 PM   #25
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Your Mom's Box
Posts: 618
Thanked 4,079 Times in 295 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wing_woo View Post
If they blew by you at twice the speed you were going, then by the time you drive by where they get caught, you 'should' have arrived late enough that they would not lump you in with them. If you arrived soon enough to be rounded up by the cops, then you would have been going quite fast yourself to be able to almost catch up to them.
ever notice how people who speed passed you always end up at the same traffic lights as you?
socialenemy69 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net