REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-28-2012, 04:13 PM   #1
nuggets mod
 
freakshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 7,051
Thanked 3,799 Times in 981 Posts
ICBC vehicle transfer and accidents over $2K

If when I bought a car from someone, they checked off "no accidents over $2000", but the CarProof reveals accidents over $2000, what are the possible outcomes? Are there any legal implications or liabilities for the seller down the road?
Advertisement
__________________
I searched for truth, and all I found was You
freakshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2012, 09:08 PM   #2
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
q0192837465's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,760
Thanked 375 Times in 181 Posts
I think like any civil suits, unless u can prove that the seller intentionally check the wrong box and u suffer loss because of it, nothing will come out of it. But I can be totally off the mark.
q0192837465 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 09:23 AM   #3
G'd up! w000weee
 
mmmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,140
Thanked 225 Times in 84 Posts
^
Probably true. Also, if it wasn't you who caused the $2000+ accidents, I don't think you can get in trouble for it.

For example, when you buy a used car, you don't do a CarProof report. So you wouldn't know if there had been an $2000+ accident, unless you got into one yourself.
mmmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 09:49 AM   #4
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
heleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rmd
Posts: 924
Thanked 435 Times in 194 Posts
...did you buy it from a dealer? My friend bought a used S2000 from a dealer that stated the car had been in no accidents. Carproof showed an accident and after a lengthy process he got his money back after complaining to the car dealers association.
heleu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 10:59 AM   #5
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
too_slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,963
Thanked 362 Times in 161 Posts
Can the seller and the buyer negotiate for a 'settlement' to resolve the error before escalating it further?


(Assuming that it's a private deal)
You can't really sue unless you can prove that you have suffered a loss due to the 'false misrepresentation.' Do you still have a copy of the ad? Does it explicitly state that 'no accidents above $2000?' Was the purchase price considerable lower than cars that are 'mint' during the time of the sale? You have to do a bit of homework before you can 'sue.'
__________________
2011 VW Tiguan Highline 4Motion (Canada)

2013 Lexus IS350 F-Sport (Melbourne)
too_slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 12:46 PM   #6
nuggets mod
 
freakshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 7,051
Thanked 3,799 Times in 981 Posts
Thanks for the input all. I'm not concerned enough about it to sue, the price was reasonable even with the accident. I'm really just curious about what the implications are for incorrectly filling out the transfer form..
__________________
I searched for truth, and all I found was You
freakshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 01:07 PM   #7
PM me for my nudes
 
smoothie.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,929
Thanked 3,772 Times in 1,001 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by too_slow View Post
Can the seller and the buyer negotiate for a 'settlement' to resolve the error before escalating it further?


(Assuming that it's a private deal)
You can't really sue unless you can prove that you have suffered a loss due to the 'false misrepresentation.' Do you still have a copy of the ad? Does it explicitly state that 'no accidents above $2000?' Was the purchase price considerable lower than cars that are 'mint' during the time of the sale? You have to do a bit of homework before you can 'sue.'
isnt the loss in resale value?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo View Post
Too bad it isn't about flipping cars to lose money, I'm really good at that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkunkWorks View Post
This wouldn't happen if you didn't drive a peasant car like an Audi...
Quote:
[14-05, 14:59] FastAnna You tiny bra wearing, gigantic son of a bitch
[15-05, 10:35] FastAnna Yeah I was dreaming of those big titties in that tiny bra
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
I'd probably blow someone for that 911
smoothie. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net