EvoFire | 01-18-2022 12:25 AM | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hakkaboy
(Post 9050870)
Let's just agree to disagree because I think that the supply constraint is over-blowned, and that the massive capital appreciation seen previously is driving the demand and FOMO behaviour, which then the current perceived supply cannot meet. Obviously covid has made listings more scarce than before, but let's just talk about just slightly before the listings crunch and into the post-covid world.
Here's a scenario:
If a crappy shack in east van listed for $1.7M, would you buy it? Your answer will probably be yes or maybe if you can actually afford it. Now, let's think about the reason why you would buy it. Is it because you think that if you do not act now, that this same shack will cost you $2M instead? Or do you really think that normal people should be paying $6,000 mortgages for a house that needs a lot of work?
Now, if you know that at most, this same shack will probably still cost $1.75M to $1.8M in 5 years time, will you that change your answer?
I'm willing to bet that answer is yes, unless you are really rich and just looking for a teardown to build your dream house. But let's just ignore those for now and focus on regular joes who will be paying those $6K payments...for a shack.
I mentioned this before, I truly believe that the reason why people are willing to spend these absurd amount of money, or even willing to "slum" it out now by buying a detached now and renting our 3/4 of their place in order to meet the mortgage payments are only doing so because the capital appreciation factor aka FOMO. Take that away, and there will not be as many people trying to rush out and get what they can while they still can type of mentality.
Again, your understanding of economics is sound, but let's just disagree on the fundamentals that I believe this is an artificial demand issue rather than purely a supply issue.
Now, if I really want to make prices go down fast, I would make it a law to cap the maximum total mortgage amount to be at 5 x income. This would suck for current homeowners who bought in the last 5 years, but at least more people will have better disposable income and can spend elsewhere in the economy lol |
So we agree on economic principles, so that's out of the way.
Your scenario is actually pretty close to mine. We just bought a 2m "shack" in Vancouver last year. Definition of shack varies but it needed a good amount of work to meet my wife's standards, and it had some questionable renos (read cheap) done about a decade ago.
We aren't rich(bcrdukes is gonna come and disagree with me lol), we can afford this but it's tight, and I didn't have to sell my toys.
We needed more space and my rational was it wasn't gonna drop and we need a bigger place anyways. We aren't renting 3/4 of it out but we were planning to rent the basement out. The house is also planning for the future when my parents may not be fit to live on their own anymore and I have space to take them in. I'm not planning to build a laneway house because I want my garage to do my garage-y things.
The supply issue is real, and only going to get more real in the next 5 years. I'm in tech, and the tech sector is growing in Vancouver. Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Shopify are all major players or will be major players, that's not counting the smaller firms or startups or remote offices opening in Vancouver. Vancouver doesn't have the talent to fill all those positions and there will be a lot of import talent, and all that import talent will need to live somewhere.
That's not counting immigration. If you still think supply isn't the real issue that's fine, we can agree to disagree.
Your idea of capping mortgage is only going to put a small dent in the market as we with a 2m purchase fall just outside of that bracket you prescribed. Most of RS would probably fall in that bracket. All it'll do is just hasten wealth transfer from parent/grandparents to kids/grandkids. You underestimate the amount of stupid money sitting around in Vancouver. And the less privileged will continue to get priced out. Like I said in the previous post, blanket policies don't work and you need to target the right demographics and groups specifically. What would make a small dent AND help entry level is raising capital gains tax from 50% of real estate gains to 100% on non-principal residence transactions. I don't even understand why that loophole exists in the first place. Actually I do, rich ppl. |