Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
11-27-2012, 07:07 PM
|
#26 | I don't get it
Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 433
Thanked 96 Times in 49 Posts
|
the day piratebay gets shut down is the day i stop downloading stuff.
|
| |
11-27-2012, 07:11 PM
|
#27 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2002 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,319
Thanked 1,283 Times in 270 Posts
|
pb has been shut down before. actually a few times i think
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Fei-Ji haha i can taste the cum in my mouth | Quote:
Originally Posted by orgasm_donor organge7 has spoken, and we have done the opposite. yay! |
Last edited by urrh; 11-27-2012 at 07:16 PM.
|
| |
11-27-2012, 07:13 PM
|
#28 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
|
If the movie/TV industry wants to cut down on piracy, they have to realize one immutable truth: DON'T SHIT ON YOUR PAYING CUSTOMERS!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
11-27-2012, 07:25 PM
|
#29 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul Not so fast.
I just read it, and the situation there is not that straightforward.
Summary: https://www.eff.org/cases/liberty-me...dings-v-tabora
It looks like it was only thrown out because they were trying to go after the provider of the Internet instead of only the downloader. | Exactly. Say you have open Wi-fi and unless they found the file on your computer, they have no case.
|
| |
11-27-2012, 07:28 PM
|
#30 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by T4RAWR i did not know you could cite american cases in canadian courts are precedent | There is no pecedent in Canadian courts as far as I can tell...and no judge in Canada is going to want to set such a big one.
|
| |
11-27-2012, 07:39 PM
|
#31 | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,090
Thanked 4,367 Times in 1,137 Posts
|
So, if I don't own any DVDs at all, can I use that as a defence to show no actual losses?
Also: even if some of this shit goes through, I love Canada. Canada: where the statutory maximum is $5000. 'Murrica: where EACH COUNT is $15,000. |
| |
11-27-2012, 08:15 PM
|
#32 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by drunkrussian don't many people nowdays use a ? does this protect? i imagine it's only either the very young or old who don't, and use public torrent sites | Nah, public torrents are just convenient and there's no concern over ratio. Most people still use them, even savvy ones. "Private" sites aren't really private and there's not really any real protection there, they function the same other than being invite-only.
Wasn't previously a concern in Canada, my bigger concern was the ratio, wanting to keep my upstream bandwidth down.
Guess I'm finally going to have to change tactics.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count. | |
| |
11-27-2012, 08:40 PM
|
#33 | Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,854
Thanked 4,387 Times in 1,145 Posts
|
sometimes u are looking for a movie that isn't on these private sites. ex. a non-well known foreign movie.
i use newsgroups first and if it's not there, public torrents
__________________ GO Canucks GO!
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) hi there
(づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ・。*。✧・゜゜・。✧。*・゜゜・✧。・$$$$$゜゜・。*。・゜*✧ . xxx~*…like dis post if u cry evry time…~*xxx |
| |
11-27-2012, 09:09 PM
|
#34 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,144
Thanked 1,843 Times in 553 Posts
|
MAC addresses are how computers in a small, local network communicate. EG: computers plugged into the same switch. With a switch, it doesn't matter what each computer's IP is because it isn't what's used to "switch" traffic amongst each other. MAC addresses are used instead. Layer 2.
IP addresses are how computers communicate on an internetwork, for instance, if 2 computers are on different subnets or networks. EG: A person on Shaw sending a file directly to a person on Telus. A router is used. Layer 3.
This is a simplistic description of the difference between MAC addresses and IP addresses. I only mention this because some of you are so confused about the two.
TLDR; MAC address doesn't mean much on the internet. Not as much as an IP, not that an IP is a completely fool-proof form of ID.
Changing your router if so-and-so caught you downloading something wouldn't do anything. An ISP can log what IP was given to whom at a given moment in time.
__________________ nns
Last edited by nns; 11-27-2012 at 09:17 PM.
|
| |
11-27-2012, 09:33 PM
|
#35 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 1,356
Thanked 1,532 Times in 479 Posts
|
A good proxy.
Done.
|
| |
11-27-2012, 09:38 PM
|
#36 | reads most threads with his pants around his ankles, especially in the Forced Induction forum.
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,645
Thanked 2,191 Times in 1,131 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by nns MAC addresses are how computers in a small, local network communicate. EG: computers plugged into the same switch. With a switch, it doesn't matter what each computer's IP is because it isn't what's used to "switch" traffic amongst each other. MAC addresses are used instead. Layer 2.
IP addresses are how computers communicate on an internetwork, for instance, if 2 computers are on different subnets or networks. EG: A person on Shaw sending a file directly to a person on Telus. A router is used. Layer 3.
This is a simplistic description of the difference between MAC addresses and IP addresses. I only mention this because some of you are so confused about the two.
TLDR; MAC address doesn't mean much on the internet. Not as much as an IP, not that an IP is a completely fool-proof form of ID.
Changing your router if so-and-so caught you downloading something wouldn't do anything. An ISP can log what IP was given to whom at a given moment in time. |
+1 but it will take tons and tons of work for the IPS to see the packets and what the packet/data actually is.
We do keep track but never ever do anything to it unless is back by a police warrant (usually if that's the case it have something to do hrassement, threatening E-mails.... ) never for download.
I sometimes give tips to customers about using P2P although I tells them very clearly do not download anything illegal but is up to them what they feel like doing.
|
| |
11-28-2012, 07:38 AM
|
#37 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: somewhere
Posts: 7,906
Thanked 2,485 Times in 1,007 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Presto Good luck. I'm behind 7 proxies! | wouldnt that be slow as hell? when i tried going to one proxy in canada, it was tooooo slow..
|
| |
11-28-2012, 08:11 AM
|
#38 | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,270
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
| |
| |
11-28-2012, 08:43 AM
|
#39 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,777
Thanked 1,045 Times in 419 Posts
|
I think they're cracking down on people that are sharing.
It's like selling drugs, they want to get the distributors not the buyers.
Unless if you're doing excessive download or constantly seeding/leeching.
Just my 2 cent. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
11-29-2012, 09:07 PM
|
#40 | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 925
Thanked 237 Times in 102 Posts
|
mega upload should be back on jan 20th next year... then witness the power of the fully operational....... icefilms.
|
| |
11-29-2012, 09:32 PM
|
#41 | Need my Daily Fix of RS
Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 287
Thanked 46 Times in 38 Posts
|
One of the tech sites I read mentioned that the company that did the monitoring was paid by the large US porn companies to do it. Those same companies did a similar thing in the US, and with info from the ISP's they sent letters to people's houses saying pay us $600 and we won't sue you, otherwise everyone will know you downloaded some porn movie illegally, etc.
What i'm really curious about is the $5,000 cap that canada has on these types of lawsuits. Is that $5,000 plus legal fees for both sides to the losing party? If not then i find it hard to believe they're actually going to go after people that don't pay up.
|
| |
11-29-2012, 09:59 PM
|
#42 | The Lone Wanderator
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,090
Thanked 4,367 Times in 1,137 Posts
| Litigating in Canada: Five Things U.S. Lawyers Might Find Surprising | McMillan Quote:
Unlike in the U.S., where attorneys' fees generally are not recoverable unless specifically permitted by statute or contract, in Canada, where the guiding principle is that "costs follow the event," attorneys' fees are awarded to the prevailing party in almost every action. In other words, the prevailing party at trial or on appeal can expect the opposing party to be ordered to pay anywhere from fifty to ninety percent of the prevailing party's actual legal costs. Attorneys' fees can also be awarded to the prevailing party on a motion. For instance, if a defendant brings a motion for summary judgment that is denied by the court, the defendant can be ordered to pay the plaintiff's legal fees incurred in responding to the motion.
As a result, because of the significant consequences that can result from losing at trial or even being denied relief on a motion, litigants in Canada tend to be more cautious when filing pleadings with the court. Moreover, because judges have broad discretion in determining whether to award costs, some judges may be reluctant to award attorneys' fees against a sympathetic plaintiff, even if the plaintiff's claim lacked merit. In any event, these cost-shifting rules have a tremendous impact on litigation strategy in Canada, both with respect to whether suit should be filed and what claims should be asserted, and with respect to what strategies should be employed to bring the suit to resolution.
| So they won't get ALL their costs. But half to 90% if they're successful, and the judge decides to give it to them.
|
| |
11-30-2012, 11:04 PM
|
#43 | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,355
Thanked 1,776 Times in 444 Posts
|
IP Addresses are not people. Good luck.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 AM. |