REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2012, 10:34 AM   #1
Say NO to blade grinders!
 
Expresso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,083
Thanked 1,256 Times in 580 Posts
Accident involving Cyclist

Who's at fault?

Vehicle going Northbound.
Cyclist going Westbound.

If the cyclist t-boned the vehicle at a pedestrian controlled intersection while the light was green. Who would be at fault? I want to say the cyclist, but then how does insurance work. Hit and Run or does ICBC go after the cyclist?
Advertisement
Expresso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 10:59 AM   #2
private modder
 
Eff-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Shore
Posts: 6,736
Thanked 2,652 Times in 741 Posts
When a bike hits a car it's treated just like if there was a collision between two cars. Both cyclist and driver can claim basic benefits that everyone gets no matter who is at fault (medical expenses, loss of wages, etc). If it's the driver's fault, the cyclist can also get an injury settlement and claim out of pocket expenses. If it's the cyclist's fault, then he doesn't.
Eff-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 11:06 AM   #3
RS.net PIMP
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver/LA
Posts: 4,898
Thanked 3,057 Times in 824 Posts
The cyclist is treated as any other vehicle and must obey the same traffic rules as a car, so if the cyclist entered the intersection while you had a green and right of way, the cyclist would be at fault.

Too many cyclist seem to think they are pedestrians when at crosswalks and intersections and proceed assuming they have the right of way. Cyclist are actually prohibited from using crosswalks, unless they dismount and walk their bike across as a pedestrian, but I see cyclist way to often blowing through crosswalks and intersections or assuming they have the right of way.

Quote:
A person operating a cycle
(a) must not ride on a sidewalk unless authorized by a bylaw made under section 124 or unless otherwise directed by a sign,
(b) must not, for the purpose of crossing a highway, ride on a crosswalk unless authorized to do so by a bylaw made under section 124 or unless otherwise directed by a sign
Motor Vehicle Act
7seven is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 11:56 AM   #4
I told him no, what y'all do?
 
GLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,844
Thanked 5,814 Times in 2,502 Posts
i would imagine that it would be pretty tough for ICBC to go after a cyclist when they'll just get up and take off on bike. i'd assume you'd have to somehow get their ID and identify them for ICBC to go after someone.
__________________
Feedback
http://www.revscene.net/forums/showthread.php?t=611711

Quote:
Greenstoner
1 rat shit ruins the whole congee
originalhypa
You cannot live the life of a whore and expect a monument to your chastity
Quote:
[22-12, 08:51]mellomandidnt think and went in straight..scrapped like a bitch
[17-09, 12:07]FastAnna glowjob
[17-09, 12:08]FastAnna I like dat

GLOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 12:06 PM   #5
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
maxxxboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,849
Thanked 291 Times in 122 Posts
Like what other said above, the Cyclist will be at fault. They have to obey the rules of the road like any other vehicle.

If the Cyclist is at fault and has no insurance, the Vehicle will still have to pay for the deductible to get the car fixed.
When ICBC recovers the money from the Cyclist, they will reimburse the Vehicle for the deductible.
maxxxboost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 12:07 PM   #6
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
swfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,782
Thanked 4,037 Times in 709 Posts
Cyclist shouldn't be riding on a pedestrian crossing, should be dismounted iirc. Only mounted on road
swfk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 12:16 PM   #7
Head of HR....have a seat on that couch
 
fliptuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 21,871
Thanked 15,586 Times in 4,318 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by swfk View Post
Cyclist shouldn't be riding on a pedestrian crossing, should be dismounted iirc. Only mounted on road
no shit eh? I hate seeing that shit.
__________________
feedback

Originally posted by v.b.
can we stop, my pussy hurts...
Originally posted by asian_XL
fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol
Originally posted by Fei-Ji
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Originally posted by FastAnna
when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad


RSUV #7
fliptuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 12:36 PM   #8
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 200
Thanked 60 Times in 20 Posts
Not sure there is enough information.... who had the green light (N-S traffic, or E-W traffic)? the car or the cyclist?
Also, people are reacting as if the cyclist was riding in the crosswalk. Was that the case?

Not that it really matters.... what Eff-1 and maxxxboost said seems correct about determining fault and how ICBC would chase down payment... of course, this is assuming the cyclist is at fault for running a stop-sign when the car had right of way. But this is all conjecture right now.
chunk_stir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 03:45 PM   #9
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
finbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1966 Mustang
Posts: 617
Thanked 1,979 Times in 262 Posts
If the cyclist fled the scene then he/she knows they haven't a case against you.
File a hit and run and move on with your life.
finbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 04:09 PM   #10
Say NO to blade grinders!
 
Expresso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,083
Thanked 1,256 Times in 580 Posts
I guess I should have rephrased and asked how the ICBC process would work. Damage was minimal. Not worth paying a deductible for. Unless it would be fully covered. No one was hurt either and information was exchanged.
Expresso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 04:13 PM   #11
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
maxxxboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,849
Thanked 291 Times in 122 Posts
IMO, if it involved another party, i would report it to be on the safe side. After reporting the incident, you can choose to fix it or leave it. Protect yourself. Imagine if he ended up filing the claim first.

It is a good thing that nobody was injured.
maxxxboost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 04:31 PM   #12
RS Veteran
 
Spidey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,778
Thanked 1,265 Times in 618 Posts
It is such a pain to deal with cyclists.. I think all cyclists should carry insurance, or have it effect their BC Driver's licence, but there are too many factors to consider, such as, children on bikes, and adults who do not have their driving license. In the end, if there is a collision between a vehicle, and a cyclist, and it is the cyclist at fault, the driver of the car is effed. That, imo, is unfair and BS. There has to be a way to make cyclists be more accountable, especially when we have treehuggers such as Gregor as our mayor.

It would be unfair for someone to have to take a cyclist to court and sue them. I wonder in this case, if ICBC would be the ones who sue, since they are the ones paying for your vehicle to be fixed.
Spidey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:21 PM   #13
private modder
 
Eff-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Shore
Posts: 6,736
Thanked 2,652 Times in 741 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HachiSix View Post
I guess I should have rephrased and asked how the ICBC process would work. Damage was minimal. Not worth paying a deductible for. Unless it would be fully covered. No one was hurt either and information was exchanged.
I could be wrong but I believe it's handled just like any other crash. If ICBC says it's not your fault, your repairs are covered and your deductible should be waived. If they say you're at fault, then your collision coverage would pay for repairs and you'd have to pay deductible and premium increase.
Eff-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:22 PM   #14
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Klobbersaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lollipop Lane
Posts: 8,528
Thanked 194 Times in 97 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HachiSix View Post
I guess I should have rephrased and asked how the ICBC process would work. Damage was minimal. Not worth paying a deductible for. Unless it would be fully covered. No one was hurt either and information was exchanged.
i would file a claim against the cyclist, sure the damage was minimal but the damage wouldn't be there if the cyclist followed the rules of the road
__________________
Its Klobbering Time!
Klobbersaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:23 PM   #15
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Klobbersaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lollipop Lane
Posts: 8,528
Thanked 194 Times in 97 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueG2 View Post
It would be unfair for someone to have to take a cyclist to court and sue them. I wonder in this case, if ICBC would be the ones who sue, since they are the ones paying for your vehicle to be fixed.
Vancouver cyclist sued by driver after collision - British Columbia - CBC News
__________________
Its Klobbering Time!
Klobbersaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-27-2012, 08:36 PM   #16
RS Veteran
 
Spidey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,778
Thanked 1,265 Times in 618 Posts
thanks for the link. good to know idiot cyclists can be held accountable. But it seems like it is at the expense of paying for your own lawyer... I guess a good lawyer wouldn't take a case they won't win anyways.
Spidey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 05:53 PM   #17
NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
kind of out of context but i always find it funny seeing the whole cyclist vs driver battle. my car buddies complain about cyclists and my riding buddies complain about drivers.

as both a cyclist and a driver, i definitely side with the cyclists. drivers in this city give cyclists no respect on the road. can't count the number of times i've had near misses of cars pulling out of parking spots without looking, cars squeezing me close to hitting parked cars, turning right in front of me on green lights at intersections, parking in bike lanes, etc. you name it....

and this is with me following all the rules as a cyclist.
jerkstore is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-30-2012, 06:43 PM   #18
RS Veteran
 
Spidey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,778
Thanked 1,265 Times in 618 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerkstore View Post
kind of out of context but i always find it funny seeing the whole cyclist vs driver battle. my car buddies complain about cyclists and my riding buddies complain about drivers.

as both a cyclist and a driver, i definitely side with the cyclists. drivers in this city give cyclists no respect on the road. can't count the number of times i've had near misses of cars pulling out of parking spots without looking, cars squeezing me close to hitting parked cars, turning right in front of me on green lights at intersections, parking in bike lanes, etc. you name it....

and this is with me following all the rules as a cyclist.
Are you wearing clothes that are visible to drivers? I do agree that Lower mainland drivers, in general, are morons. With that said, a lot of Cyclists go around like they own the road, and are entitled. You can blame critical mass for making drivers generalize and think all cyclists are a bunch of douchebags.
Spidey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 07:18 PM   #19
NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueG2 View Post
Are you wearing clothes that are visible to drivers? I do agree that Lower mainland drivers, in general, are morons. With that said, a lot of Cyclists go around like they own the road, and are entitled. You can blame critical mass for making drivers generalize and think all cyclists are a bunch of douchebags.
i wear whatever i decide to wear that day.

i do have really bright flashing led lights on the front (white) and back (red) of my bike though. (as required by law) my foot straps have reflective striping on them too.

for arguments sake, there are a lot of cyclists that don't know what they're doing. riding slow as fuck in the middle of the lane down oak st, using pedestrian crosswalks, taking bridges that don't have bike lanes, etc.

but for the guys like me that are following all the rules and still wind up avoiding getting hit by cars, getting honked at, etc. it's really frustrating.
jerkstore is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-30-2012, 07:59 PM   #20
RS Veteran
 
Spidey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,778
Thanked 1,265 Times in 618 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerkstore View Post
i wear whatever i decide to wear that day.

i do have really bright flashing led lights on the front (white) and back (red) of my bike though. (as required by law) my foot straps have reflective striping on them too.

for arguments sake, there are a lot of cyclists that don't know what they're doing. riding slow as fuck in the middle of the lane down oak st, using pedestrian crosswalks, taking bridges that don't have bike lanes, etc.

but for the guys like me that are following all the rules and still wind up avoiding getting hit by cars, getting honked at, etc. it's really frustrating.
With the drivers around here, it's probably something you will have to face as long as you ride your bike. I find myself avoiding cars when I drive!
Spidey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 08:03 PM   #21
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Klobbersaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lollipop Lane
Posts: 8,528
Thanked 194 Times in 97 Posts
i saw a cyclist riding north on cambie in the right lane between broadway and the bridge and he got into an arguement with a taxi cab driver, a bunch of pedestrians ganged up on the cyclist and told him to use the damn bike lanes, which was 1 block away on yukon
__________________
Its Klobbering Time!
Klobbersaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 10:32 PM   #22
NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klobbersaurus View Post
i saw a cyclist riding north on cambie in the right lane between broadway and the bridge and he got into an arguement with a taxi cab driver, a bunch of pedestrians ganged up on the cyclist and told him to use the damn bike lanes, which was 1 block away on yukon
yeah that'll happen. there's one on heather too. i won't say i don't ride on busy roads at times if i'm going short distances or when there's barely any traffic. i've ridden north on cambie a few times, but since it's downhill you can blast down there pretty fast and i ride hard as is. most of the time i'm keeping up with traffic if not going faster than traffic.

if i'm going long distances i always look for bike lanes though...ie. riding on 10th instead of broadway, ontario instead of main, etc.

on that note, cab drivers are a cyclist's worst enemy. like 50% of close calls i've had have been with cabs.
jerkstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net