REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-19-2013, 05:32 AM   #1
I STILL don't get it
 
donot521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 491
Thanked 74 Times in 28 Posts
Evoque or Q5

I m in the market for small SUV and have narrowed down to these 2 cars...
Both are great looking car and perform almost the same. However I need a car that can last over 100k km.

which will be a better choice? Since Audi and Land rover score quite low in reliability department.

Any input?
Advertisement
donot521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 05:48 AM   #2
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: surrey
Posts: 155
Thanked 77 Times in 33 Posts
Evoque hands down!
duc_evo_sp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 06:07 AM   #3
PJ
My name is PJ and I like dogs.
 
PJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancity/Toronto
Posts: 3,180
Thanked 1,683 Times in 532 Posts
Reliability shouldn't be a main concern when it comes to these cars.

"Better" in this case is subjective... so just choose whatever you like.

I personally LOVE the look of the Evoques.
__________________
Studies show 100% of people die.. Might as well have some fun.

Hello my name is PJ.


Buy/Sell Feedback 1-0-0
PJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 06:27 AM   #4
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
I would go with the evoque. Im a big guy and I felt comfortable in the evoque, you sink into the car, and the full glass roof makes the car feel larger.
Posted via RS Mobile
bigzz786786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 06:36 AM   #5
I STILL don't get it
 
donot521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 491
Thanked 74 Times in 28 Posts
I personally love evoque.. sat and drove one...quite spacious inside and fun to drive with sport mode..but my wife kept ditching about ford ecoboost engine that evoque has.

I am still confuse how does she know that...lol
Posted via RS Mobile
donot521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 06:50 AM   #6
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
AWDTurboLuvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montreal
Posts: 590
Thanked 324 Times in 144 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by donot521 View Post
I m in the market for small SUV and have narrowed down to these 2 cars...
Both are great looking car and perform almost the same. However I need a car that can last over 100k km.

which will be a better choice? Since Audi and Land rover score quite low in reliability department.

Any input?
Wife and I are also looking at small SUVs to replace our car down the road and have tested the Evoque and the 3.0T Q5.

If you're just driving yourself and one other person, the Evoque is much more stylish and it feels quite a bit more special. However, the design really does compromise visibility and it feels a bit cramped overall in terms of leg room (relative to the Q5). It was a bit wider though, so I appreciated that. The touchscreen was a bit of a letdown to use and I preferred the MMI in the Audi as an interface.

Handling was pretty good for a CUV, ride was a bit jarring though in dynamic mode over rougher pavement. I could live with it but maybe others would just leave it in normal mode. Engine was hit or miss. Good power, but not very smooth in delivery. Felt like an older boosted motor to me...very much like a chipped 1.8T.

Biggest downside was price. With a base price of 46 large, I could get into a 3.0T Q5 with much more power and a good set of standard features already.

Q5 was much more mundane inside. As mentioned before, MMI was better than the Ford derived touchscreen in the RR. Seats were supportive but not as bolstered as the Evoque.
Handling was a bit softer than the Evoque but more controlled. Typical Quattro stability. Much more substantial power than the RR so performance is no contest IMO.

I would say between the two, if you are single, go with the RR. If you want to haul passengers or drive more often, I think the Q5 is the way to go. If you are patient, there is the 2014 SQ5 on the way as well. My money is on that one.
__________________
"Happiness lies in the joy of achievement and the thrill of creative effort"

Last edited by AWDTurboLuvr; 02-19-2013 at 06:58 AM.
AWDTurboLuvr is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-19-2013, 07:25 AM   #7
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
dark0821's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Van604
Posts: 2,745
Thanked 2,063 Times in 554 Posts
my friend was in the same dilemma a while back,
honestly, reliability on both cars are.. well, hit or miss, I dont know much about the RR, but Audi electronics are well... still Audi electronics, my friend has the daytime LED replaced once within the first year, under warranty off course, but still, breaking down within the year?

I've only sat in a 2 door Evoque so couldnt comment on the space, but that huge glass roof... and its an attention whore, people do stare at red lights, which is a good thing I guess?

It came down to price like AWDTurboLuvr mentioned, and with the final price coming close to 60K, its the choice between a fully loaded audi and a semi-loaded RR.

So, its still up to you, but whichever one you choose, maybe extended warranty?
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts

AE101 Rolla 96' //Sold
RPS13 240SX 90' //STOLEN
RMS13 240SX 91' //Scrapped
RHS13 240SX 90' //Scrapped
S35 Rogue 12' //Gifted to Parents
GD 6MT Elantra 13' //Sold
CZ4A 5MT GSR Evo 08' // Totalled
Ioniq DCT 19' //Traded in
NA MX-5 5MT 97' // Sold
Prius Prime 21' //Traded in
Tesla Model 3 RWD DD
GSX-R 600 K5' Mental Therapy
Prius Prime 24' New Kids Carrier
dark0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 07:30 AM   #8
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 378
Thanked 979 Times in 153 Posts
Neither of them are perfect:
2012 Audi Q5 models recalled over shattering sunroofs
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...1400-cars.html

I am not a fan of either of them, but if I had to narrow it down to one it would be the Audi.
VRYALT3R3D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 08:01 AM   #9
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,091
Thanked 485 Times in 149 Posts
GLK 250 Diesel
If you haven't looked into it.
Prob get 800km tank
Iron Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-19-2013, 08:09 AM   #10
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Ducdesmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 2,216
Thanked 156 Times in 45 Posts
I have this same issue awhile back. Was looking for a compact SUV and thought I had it narrowed down to the Q5. Then the 2013 GLK came out and I was sold immediately.

I am not a big fan of the Ford motor in the Evogue..or the weird slopped down roofline with a chopped rear window.

Q5 looked great especially with the sport line package, but had an A4 1.8T back in the days with nothing but problems left a sour taste in my mouth.. Plus the turbo lag sucked really bad. Drove the 3.0T and the lag isnt as noticeable, but still exists.

The GLK, imo, looks the best amongst the above 3. More refined interior and exterior. Great handling, tones of leg room front and back and decent trunk space. Also got the 20" AMG wheels.



Hope that help.s
Ducdesmo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-19-2013, 12:49 PM   #11
Ready to be Man handled by RS!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 96
Thanked 303 Times in 49 Posts
Just a heads up, the SQ5 and the Q5 3.0TDI will be launching this fall. Might want to wait for those before deciding.
amusegt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:22 PM   #12
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,042
Thanked 1,051 Times in 265 Posts
I'm surprised so many people like the Evoque. It's unnecessarily over-stylized to the point of being quite effeminate.
bananana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:36 PM   #13
DOES HE LOOK LIKE A BITCH?
 
Culture_Vulture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,037
Thanked 2,571 Times in 689 Posts
2-door SUV?
Culture_Vulture is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-19-2013, 02:44 PM   #14
Who's naughty? I___i
 
Szeto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: GVR
Posts: 805
Thanked 173 Times in 73 Posts
i think Murano is gonna have a 2-door version too ... can't recall where I saw that news
Szeto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:45 PM   #15
:: Sells McLarens, Not tofu :okay: ::
 
tofu1413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,740
Thanked 11,815 Times in 3,329 Posts
^ they had that cross cabrio.... its so ugly that even our dealer didnt want to sell one. (i work at a nissan dealer..)


my vote goes to evoque.
__________________
19' Audi TT-RS S tronic w/ RS sport - Glacier White

13' Nissan DBA-R35 GT-R Black Ed - Black met. - "Sophia"

00' Acura 1.6EL - // Power of dreams Project - "Unity"

02' Nissan M35 Stagea - "Wynn"

91' Honda EF Civic CX - "Xander"

- The Drinker of Many Many Coffees @ McLaren Vancouver
tofu1413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:53 PM   #16
Who's naughty? I___i
 
Szeto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: GVR
Posts: 805
Thanked 173 Times in 73 Posts
^didn't Morrey BBY have one? or maybe i am just seeing things. lol
Szeto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 04:07 PM   #17
:: Sells McLarens, Not tofu :okay: ::
 
tofu1413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,740
Thanked 11,815 Times in 3,329 Posts
yes they did. not sure if its still there. its a USA unit however..


btw, Szeto your avatar. LOL
__________________
19' Audi TT-RS S tronic w/ RS sport - Glacier White

13' Nissan DBA-R35 GT-R Black Ed - Black met. - "Sophia"

00' Acura 1.6EL - // Power of dreams Project - "Unity"

02' Nissan M35 Stagea - "Wynn"

91' Honda EF Civic CX - "Xander"

- The Drinker of Many Many Coffees @ McLaren Vancouver
tofu1413 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-20-2013, 12:48 AM   #18
I am on the internets
 
maxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,991
Thanked 184 Times in 80 Posts
q5.

dont buy a ford edge with a range rover badge at the front
__________________
"As Sir Francis Bacon once said, 'There is no beauty which hath not some strangeness about its proportions'.
And he's right, who ever he is. I mean, look at Keira Knightley.
She's just an ironing board with a face. And she works." - JC on the Alfa 8C
maxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 10:27 AM   #19
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Timewav3zer0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,643
Thanked 1,558 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Szeto View Post
^didn't Morrey BBY have one? or maybe i am just seeing things. lol
haha ya it was a us model...someone actually bought it
__________________
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Timewav3zer0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 11:49 AM   #20
2-Wheelin' Mod
 
Sunfighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,404
Thanked 994 Times in 425 Posts
I am a HUGE Land Rover fan... but in this class I would go GLK...
__________________
ROOGP
Long Live the King : RIP John (Gwilo)
Sunfighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 11:55 AM   #21
I don't get it
 
dygital's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 445
Thanked 302 Times in 49 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsallaboutgz View Post
Q5 looked great especially with the sport line package, but had an A4 1.8T back in the days with nothing but problems left a sour taste in my mouth.. Plus the turbo lag sucked really bad. Drove the 3.0T and the lag isnt as noticeable, but still exists.
That's impossible for the 3.0T to be laggy since the T does NOT stand for supercharged but is just way of saying forced induction for Audi. The 3L engine in the Audi Q5 is supercharged.
dygital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 12:04 PM   #22
I STILL don't get it
 
donot521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 491
Thanked 74 Times in 28 Posts
I love GLK but my wife think it is ugly...too boxy
Posted via RS Mobile
donot521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 12:58 PM   #23
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bender Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Van
Posts: 2,516
Thanked 943 Times in 327 Posts
My friend asked the exact same questions last summer when he was expecting his new born baby.
checked out both Q5 3.0 & Evoque

he went with the safest bet - Lexus RX350 F-Sport
bigger trunk space, better value, reliability, fully equipped.
only missing from Lexus is a panoramic glass sunroof.
$65000 out the Dealership Door.
__________________
My FeedBacks
Bender Unit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 01:45 PM   #24
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
there will be a few variants of the evoque over the next few years, they are bringing out a grand evoque, which will be a larger size but smaller than the range rover sport. also will be equipped with either an 8 speed auto or the new 9 speed that they are testing out, which will improve fuel efficiency too.
bigzz786786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2013, 09:54 PM   #25
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Ducdesmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 2,216
Thanked 156 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dygital View Post
That's impossible for the 3.0T to be laggy since the T does NOT stand for supercharged but is just way of saying forced induction for Audi. The 3L engine in the Audi Q5 is supercharged.
You are right..not sure why I said 3.0T. I test drove the 2.0T. Lots of torque for such a small motor.
Ducdesmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net