So she's an ER nurse and because someone threw up on her, she was so distraught that after her shift, she was crying, speeding, and bowling through red lights, subsequently killing 2 innocent kids? This was her defense? AND IT WORKED?!?!?!

How did the judge conclude that, Hecimovic's, "simple carelessness" didn't equate to dangerous driving, causing death? What, because it wasn't premeditated? Because there's no formal charge called careless driving, causing death?

What a bunch of fucking retards.


On a side note, if an ER nurse gets that fucked up, just cause someone vomited on them, they're probably in the wrong line of work.

where'd you get the info about her being a nurse?

It's in the CBC vid, along with the judge's comment about it being simple carelessness.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...ilty-1.1859452

I hate to see what happens when a paitent shits on her shirt.......

Close YVR

law abiding citizen irl about to happen.

so the direct result of her dangerous driving caused two deaths. and she wasn't convicted of "dangerous driving causing death"?

:facepalm:

Someone get me her lawyers number! Tragic for the families :( but amazing work by the defence lawyer!

Man, this girl is fucking retarded. Judge is even a bigger one for letting her get away with shit that claimed the lives of innocent people who didn't deserve it. May karma get around to her. Condolences to the families.
Posted via RS Mobile

The airport? Why...

what a stupid bitch

Is there any info on if she at least got charged for her MVA violations? By my count, she could've been charged with at least 6 offences.

144(1)(a),(b) and (c), 131(1)(a), 148(1), 165(5). 144 and 148 should at least keep her off the road for a year.

http://www.icbc.com/driver-licensing...enceswithfines

I watched a clip from last night's news on global....the justification the judge used was "although she was speeding, her speed didn't INCREASE while going through the intersection" and she was "unfamiliar with the intersection and didn't realize the far right lane was a turning lane".

:fulloffuck::facepalm:

I just don't get it....

this must be the biggest bullshit excuse I have ever read! this legal/justice system is fucked up!

The tears story isn't legit. With my armchair investigative knowledge, why the fk would you be crying after a concert where you are likely to be cheerful and dancing? I call bs on her story and the judge. Saying people speeding through the intersection makes it ok makes no sense.
Posted via RS Mobile

sit in your armchair a little longer, read a bit more and realize the perpetrator was working, the victims were at the concert.

Well I'm glad that the Canadian justice system has decided the ignorance is a viable excuse for breaking the law.

Like I've said before shit like this is gonna end with Somone walking into the court house and shooting everyone involved
Posted via RS Mobile

Man. That is really fucked up. There has to be more to the story somehow. I mean, you hear about cases getting thrown out due to stupid shit like a cop not dotting an " i " in a report and handing in a note 2 minutes late or some irrelevant bullshit like that, but this one actually went thru court, and she was still found not guilty?!

What happened to negligence causing death? Where you dont intend to kill someone, but thru your direct or indirect actions, someone died.


Seriously, how the fuck.

Wonder what would have happened if it wasn't a white female.....

At this point, you can't tell me the judge wasn't swayed a little by the fact she is a young white female who looks like a librarian.

Just sayin'

Ladies and gentleman - I present to you the result of a Liberal government and policy making method for the past few decades. The sense of personal responsibility has been replaced with self-entitlement and complete lack of ownership to ones actions, and the tree-hugging mentality of "Transforming" criminals instead of "Punishing". We live in a fucked up world with fucked up people (whether by choice or not), so the idea of lenient sentencing in hopes they can be rehabilitated and be "re-introduced" into society has shown to be completely useless.

I'm not saying that by having heavier sentences for every drunk driving case would prevent something like this from happening (just as more gun laws won't make the streets safer from criminals - they don't care!), but in this case, the judge was completely wrong and useless in her not guilty verdict. It sends a DANGEROUS and WRONG message to people that "oh, it wasn't my fault, I was distraught so I was careless and killed 2 random people. It's not my fault! It's the tears! It's work! It's everything but me!". The judge ruled based on emotions, not facts, and that sets a dangerous precedent for future cases to come. You CANNOT make/enforce laws and policies based on emotions.

This case needs to go higher and be appealed. Wrong verdict, incompetent/emotional judge, useless justice system, and at the end of the day, 2 broken families that don't have any closure.

Justice was not served.

Ugh. What? How did this turn into a Liberal smear post?!

you know, I thought the same. That is until I did a search, dangerous driving found not guilty of causing death in Canada.

It's sad, but this looks to be a common thing. I guess the precedence was set a while ago. An example is one guy in Winnipeg was driving 112 km/h in a 60km/h zone construction zone and killed a pretty flag woman. :badpokerface:

Man found not guilty of Dangerous Driving Causing Death | CTV Winnipeg News

So....I guess we know how the court system works

^^ Except for the Liberals smearing bit, I quite agree with Bonjour43MA's post. People this day and age really need to own up to their own mistakes and start shouldering their own responsibilities. This entitlement mentality bullshxt really needs to end.

With the way our bullshxt legal system works, there is probably a good chance that the "negligence causing death" charge has been all boxed up and given an extremely narrow definition where the slightest deviation from that strict legal definition means the alleged perpetrator will get off the hook. This is why a lot of average folks like us get pissed off at the legal system. It is only there to protect those who knows how to play the game, or those that have the means to hire someone to play the game for them. Average folks like us will just get fxxked in the a$$ by the system time after time.

Wonder what would happen if it wasn't a female judge.

At this point, you can't tell me the judge wasn't swayed a little by the fact women make decisions based on emotions and not fact, and sympathized with another woman who's emotions got her in a bad spot.

Just sayin'