BC lawsuit over engagement ring
 

$16,000 engagement ring at centre of bitter battle between former fiances Jessica Bennett, Pasquale Angelino Zampieri | CTV News

I dunno if it is bad manners on my part or not, but as I watched the video, I just couldn't stop laughing...:awwyeah:

LOL awesome...wish there was more!

The will go back to the man...Golddigger should just renew her POF profile and find another sucker.

Engaged after three weeks? :facepalm:

When you know...you know. :fullofwin:....errrrr...

So fucking pathetic.

Give the ring back, move on. Who wants to hang onto something from a past relationship...it will prevent both of them from moving on....this is the reason I gave mine back.

How could I move on if I still had it? Even though he was the one who cheated, left me with a house that was being built, 1000s in debt and I really could have used the money....it wasn't worth it.

together forever XOXO 143 <3

i can give you 16,500 reasons why...

:troll:

couldn't get a kidney, keep a ring! :badpokerface:

lol another POF success

aged 46 & 27 :pokerface:

dude probably wanted to bang the girl, girl probably only says "no sex till marriage"

Gets married, girl runs away with ring

like dis if u kry evrytim

Keep that stupid shit off of RS. Worst. Internet. Fad. Ever.

27? :suspicious:

$16,000 ring for a girl this geezer met within 3 weeks time? Sounds like he was trying to buy a wife.

Doesn't matter if she's a gold digger, if you treat women like a commodity, then I kinda don't feel bad he got "owned" instead. :lol

Mad cuz u cry evrtim?:pokerface:

Looks like she was trying to get a kidney. Also she might be a pro. Will find out on Monday.

Interesting video.

The woman probably thought the man wouldn't sue her or go to court for that ring.

She guessed wrong.

Her legal bills will probably top the price of the ring.

I am assuming... and this is an assumption... that the man is just suing her for the principle of "return ring if not married".

The man really doesn't care about the cost of the ring.

He wants it back, based on principles, and is prepared to spend a lot on legal costs.

After all, I am sure he is spending more than $16,000+/- in legal fees.

For the guy, it's about the principle.

For the woman, I think she just wants to keep it and sell it, and took the risk that the man wouldn't sue her for it.

Or, it could be she is vindictive.

She mentions that she had $400k in debt in the video, and the article mentions she was 27 (truly, does she look 27? debatable).

There is an obvious motive here.

Why, oh why, did she want to keep the ring, from a guy that she detests?

Or, maybe, in addition to selling the ring, she is vindictive and wants to "hurt" the guy by keeping the ring.

Or... both vindictive AND wanted to sell the ring.

Either way, the winners of the battle royale are........ the lawyers.

Nice.

Poem.

bro....

Civil suits are anything below 25k. They can represent themselves.

Good point.

They can.

In reality:
The guy has a lawyer, as shown in the video.

The woman, quote (in the video) "until she hires another lawyer" for next week.

Lol. While watching the video, I can tell already she's a gold digger cunt
Posted via RS Mobile

Small claims is anything under 25k, not a civil claim. A civil claim can be anything from the smallest amount to billions of dollars.

27 my ass. she looks 40

Your quote just reminds me that there really is a Fresh Prince episode for everything. Well minus the runs away with ring part.