![]() |
^ I like the new interior more than the current gen, but that bulbous nose/hood doesn't look very good in pictures... Maybe in person it will look better. |
lol, with a 4cyl T i cant wait to see someone rice the shit out of the new mustang and attempt to pull it off as a JDM car :fullofwin: |
the rear looks weird..ish http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/635792.jpg http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/635788.jpg |
Fucking gorgeous, although I would change that black rear glossy trunk lid space between the tail lights to body colour or something else. |
wtf were they thinking with this body line in the rear quarter... http://imageshack.us/a/img132/6494/35s4.jpg but 300+hp from the eco boost sounds pretty good... i wonder how much more tuners would be able to get out of it |
Quote:
http://i.imgur.com/FwMGfN1.jpg |
i think the rear straight on doesnt look half bad lol, its just that from the side/ any 3/4 view shows the side mirrors and they look wayyy too damn small, reminds me of the shit that the camaro has with the big and tall ass doors with puny ass windows |
Sorry for the bad quality, saw this on IG. From this angle it looks awesome. http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/i...ps75580ec1.png Posted via RS Mobile |
|
guess ford's trying to kill the mustang.. that thing is fucking hideous. |
I'm not a huge fan of it but the general consensus is people love it. I like the retro design of the previous gen more and more... |
|
|
|
I like how they didn't include the 80's and 90's models in that video. lol |
|
|
|
I still think it looks stupid as a Mustang, at this point they should just bury the Mustang brand and start something new, you can only go so far before the car you are building doesn't really have anything to do with the original apart from the name. I'd name this the Fusion Sport and call it a day. |
Quote:
Get rid of the current Camaro, call it a Malibu sport? Perhaps call the current Challenger an Avenger sport...? |
Quote:
The Camaro and Challenger also have nothing to do with the originals, none of the new vehicles out there right now can shine a light on their elders. Toyota kept the spirit of the AE86 going with the FR-S, but they weren't hypocrites about "moving on" while they milked the same name. If companies are going to go with the "we have to move on" mentality on design, then they should really move on with branding too. You can only milk a model for so long before it becomes a beaten horse (heh). "Does the current 911 really have anything to do with the original, apart from the name? Should they get rid of that as well?" Nobody said anything about getting rid of the cars, the point is to not label them as something they are not and will never live up to. Again, if companies are going to rant about "moving on", they should really just drop the whole botched throwback shit and create something that stands alone as it's own brand. This new "Mustang" is a prime example of creating an Aston Martin and labelling it as a 60's pony car. I don't really care if I see a 2045 Camry, there is no history there, no name to squander when it was always a beige sedan. Don't get me started on the Charger. |
I totally disagree with the name removal though, the charger i agree with 100%. That has nothing to do with the original. HOWEVER, the Mustang, and Camaro both are still available with RWD, a manual transmission, and a big V8 shoved in the front, along with aggressive styling. Just like the original... IDK. |
2015 Ford Mustang option prices gallop onto the web - Autoblog Quote:
Quote:
|
well... it's loud. don't know much else about it though... http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/show...350-2462.html? http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/atta...3&d=1405434115 |
Quote:
apparently its going to have 500hp NA and flat plane crank pretty racy for an american v8 pony car |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net