REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum

Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Police Forum

Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only.

Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2014, 02:36 PM   #26
I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,977
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
Common sense in this case sounds like it would be to replace the stop signs with yield signs if the sight lines are in fact that good.
Consider reading the research before commenting on photo enforcement:

Support Road safety through education, not speed enforcement.
sebberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 04:37 PM   #27
RS Peace Officer
zulutango's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,850
Thanked 1,623 Times in 678 Posts
Originally Posted by sebberry View Post
Common sense in this case sounds like it would be to replace the stop signs with yield signs if the sight lines are in fact that good.

As they have in most intersections in New Zealand. They call them "give way" signs.

At the rest of the corners they use "roundabouts" and the people there actually know to signal their way out of them.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 06:54 AM   #28
RS controls my life!
jackal's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 737
Thanked 275 Times in 78 Posts
i believe driving is about 50% understanding protocols and procedures and 50% common sense.

i basically speed all the time when safe to do so. (i guess i should rephrase to when i deem it safe to do so) i roll lots of stop signs and right turns at red lights and i get the whole "driving tax" mentality but common sense and a good understanding of your surroundings is more important imo then following the rules all the time. (which is how i account for my accident free/incident free driving record over the past 13 years)

i would love to meet a judge with a level head enough to see that there are circumstances where small infractions should be allowed to slide. and i guess what i was kind of getting at is if for example you run into an officer who decides to give you a ticket for some small infraction is there any chance of a judge using his/her discretion to throw away a ticket based on evidence presented that said infraction wasn't really causing any real harm. or are judges always zero discretion, by the book, to the letter, when it comes to driving infractions.

and just to reiterate i don't actually have a ticket to dispute here.

Last edited by jackal; 05-15-2014 at 07:00 AM.
jackal is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc. cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of