![]() |
well i guess i meant like non-supercars but yes you have a point |
God, that Eisenmann on the V10.. Hurry up Eisenmann and make one for the M235! |
Kreissieg Exhaust |
getting back on topic... |
the question is, does it outperform Shelby GT500? |
Tough call. I'm pretty sure the shelby is lighter |
a little bit better sound... |
dem is sexy noises. still doesn't sound better than a jag f-type though.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
707HP :megusta: |
This car is strictly for people who must swing their automotive dick, zzz yawn |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
But can they put that drivetrain into a Grand Cherokee? |
Talk about bang for the buck - this heads straight to the front of the class. I'm thinking about 65k? I think it'll probably run similar numbers to the GT500 given the weight disparity. I don't think the GC will get this engine according to SRT's future plans...only the Charger. But you never know - the GC would be a beast and have the traction to put all the power down. http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/w...-Year-Plan.png |
until someone gets their hands on one, i feel like this is just a massive dick measuring contest of hp and nobody really knows how it handles/feels on the road. i mean, look at the viper, its relevancy sorta died of pretty fast compared to the amount of hype it had and with a massive fucking car like the challenger, unless they used a shitton of light weight materials and shed off a load of weight, i have high doubts that it could be considered competitively "light" even in the muscle car class |
707 Horsepower is a phenomenal number to come with a warranty, but that's just one piece of the puzzle. regardless, 700+hp gets you going quickly. Really, really quickly. Does it have brakes that can adequately stop it? Is the suspension set up correctly, or is it just a wallowy mess of wheel spin? Are the tires a good match for the power? I'd personally much rather have a very well sorted 400hp car, than a 707 horsepower mess. |
new Vipers haven't been selling as well as they hoped... I guess the new challenger is a way to try to make up some of the losses from the Viper... I really feel that they under delivered with the new Viper... it was built to match the ZR1, which was a couple years old by the time the new Viper was released. Curious to see the real world performance numbers of the new Challenger... I wouldn't buy one just because they are boats though |
Nothing sound better then a push-rod V8, sorry Maybe one with a twin turbo... |
Sorry it's not aggressive looking enough especially with 707hp. I will wait it out |
Quote:
Ever since Camaro ZL1(580hp) and Mustang GT500(662hp) came out, Challenger SRT8 became much less attractive with only 485hp. Say Chrysler kept SRT-8's power the same and added extra features like suspension and brakes and whatnot, I can bet you pretty good money that it won't sell. Japanese car manufactures tend to do that a lot, they add so much features and goodies on higher grade or special edition vehicles, and never add much horsepower. I'm glad that Nismo GT-R comes with 595hp, because Honda NSX Type-R only had 280hp and was a bit rip off in my perspective. |
Quote:
Maybe Chrysler is trying to build a sleeper, who knows? http://www.bugatti.com/pages/75/medi...h/fallback.jpg |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net