![]() |
Basically you have to suck the manufacturer's dick or you won't get to drive the cars How could you do an unbiased car review blog without getting banned by the manufacturers from having access to their cars? How would you get access to them in the first place? |
Quote:
... and from what capt. slow found out, the video would not last more than 13 minutes :lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Am I the only person who thinks these huge horsepower numbers are actually hurtful to auto enthusiasts? So much of the driver's experience is independent of having gobs of power. Typical of modern life though the manufacturers are focusing on the one thing that the slobbering fucking retard unwashed masses understand: HORSEPOWER |
Meh when it comes to muscle cars it's the numbers that sell. No one likes the bragging rights of horsepower numbers more than a muscle car owner. |
Quote:
If you don't like horsepower war, just go buy Miata or Elise. |
Quote:
Now that Mustang is going to have 750+hp stock, I bet Camaro will have 800+hp and I'm sure Dodge will come up with even higher hp Challenger. ...and what happened to Viper and Corvette...? |
Next Camaro ZL1... 850 hp. |
Quote:
What would be really cool is if Viper and Corvette both lost weight and gained higher-revving engines with the car geared more towards driver experience than brutal horsepower. Set to compete with the GT350. |
Quote:
I would rather see Corvette and Viper trying to compete with GT-R and other supercars. They're all talking about entering less than 7:00 on Nurburgring. I would love to see this competition getting escalated. |
Quote:
.....to the dyno .....and not the track .....because queen .....because ROI .....because idiot |
Quote:
all that being said, matt farah had a point with his review on the 2013 roush stage 3. for that type of car/chassis the 600hp is way too much. its hard to have any real fun in the car without either trying to kill yourself or get arrested. matt farah's review of the roush stage 3. Spoiler! Quote:
edit: damn assholes lol. started on the mustang talk and me forget this was the challenger hellcat thread. |
Quote:
Mercedes-AMG English: C 63 AMG Sedan vehicle overview 457hp V8 0-100km/h in 4.4 seconds 250km/h top speed (electronically limited) it's not THAT impressive... |
Quote:
I bet if you and I got on a closed course with that car and took turns driving the shit out of it we would both be laughing and having a ton of fun thrashing it! Impressive or not, I have no doubt that a C63 is a smile factory |
what 8 gears sounds like on the dyno: ... and these are the figures they got :eek: 635 hp and 591 lb-ft of torque at the rear wheels. About 722 hp at the crank. 672-lb-ft Torque |
Quote:
Cars are going full retard!!! |
Quote:
|
wait till hennessey or some crazier tuners get their hands on the hellcat...all cats break loose. |
Anyone with me when I say, I really want a Hellcat Charger. For the dollar for hp value its insane! |
Quote:
|
hellcat playing in the rain |
this is why I choose Dodge as the brand for me =p love it when company makes cars like these, just because |
|
Quote:
|
can't have this thread end like this... hope this will save it: |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net