Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. | | |
10-08-2014, 03:00 PM
|
#1 | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: VanCity
Posts: 486
Thanked 931 Times in 183 Posts
| B.C. government announces stiffer penalties for distracted driving Quote:
British Columbia is cracking down on distracted drivers, announcing on Wednesday stiffer penalties for activities such as talking on mobile phones or texting.
B.C. Justice Minister Suzanne Anton said effective Oct. 20, penalty points for drivers who are caught talking on a hand-held device while driving will be increased from zero to three demerits. This new penalty, which also covers infractions like watching a DVD, programming a phone’s GPS, and operating hand-held audio players, is being combined with the $167 fine already in place for talking on mobile phones. Penalty points remain on person’s driving record for five years and can result in further penalties, including prohibitions from driving. The penalty for anyone who receives more than one distracted driving ticket in a year is at least $634, Anton said, the equivalent of two fines and a $300 penalty premium for six points.
Driver penalty points are separate from Autoplan insurance premiums and those caught for these infractions will be billed even if they don’t own or insure a vehicle.
The premium ranges from $175 for four points to $24,000 for 50 or more points, according to the Insurance Corp. of B.C.
Anton said the province will continue to look at whether to increase fines for distracted driving and will consider fine amounts in other provinces. Ontario, for instance, is considering raising the fine for texting to up to $1,000 from the $60 to $500 range.
“I’m very concerned that distraction in all forms is the second-highest contributing factor in motor vehicle fatalities in B.C. It’s clear that the $167 fine is not enough on its own, so we’re starting by targeting those people who are talking on a hand-held device while they’re driving with more severe penalties,” said Anton, in a statement.
“Ticket volumes show us that more drivers are ticketed for talking on an electronic device than for texting and driving, and so that is where we decided to start with the new penalty points.”
Distracted driving, especially texting and talking on phones, has become a serious problem over the last decade with the introduction of smartphones and has been the subject of recent campaigns by the Vancouver police, ICBC and the RCMP to educate the public about the dangers and fatality rates.
ICBC is raising rates 5.2 per cent for all drivers, citing a $500-million increase in injury claims for distracted driving in the past five years.
Distracted driving was blamed for 81 deaths on B.C. roads in 2012, while 55 were attributed to impaired driving. Speeding is still the top cause of deaths on B.C. roads.
There were 51,000 B.C. drivers sanctioned last year for distracted driving.
| B.C. government announces stiffer penalties for distracted driving
Seems quite strict but I'm glad! Can't tell you how many people I see blatantly talking on their phones or texting while driving.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 03:30 PM
|
#2 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,859
Thanked 7,759 Times in 2,313 Posts
|
Greaaaattttt.
More tickets for people at red lights who are texting, because the fear of a spontaneously exploding vehicle is real...
Meanwhile those on the highway will continue to get away with it, and cause accidents and kill people, cause police can't (or won't try) to adequately enforce the real intent of the law...
EDIT: Seriously 51,000 tickets written last year for distracted driving. I would like to know how many of these occurred at red lights, or stop signs.
|
| | This post thanked by: | 4444, 604dragon, cruz-in, dee242, dL, dogeatcookie, Dragon-88, Energy, fT-z33wor, Gerbs, Godzira, jbsali, JoshuaWong, LsquareD, Manic!, mb_, mikemhg, MindBomber, multicartual, muteki, Nightwalker, Nocardia, PiuYi, Presto, StylinRed, threezero, Tr1ll, van_city23, vitaminG, vixroar, westopher, xmisstrinh |
10-08-2014, 03:34 PM
|
#3 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,423
Thanked 14,760 Times in 3,870 Posts
|
My favorite is ppl who put their iPhones on speakerphone but still hold it with one hand in the air. Hey dumbass, it's called HANDS FREE
|
| |
10-08-2014, 03:37 PM
|
#4 | I keep RS good
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Cosmos
Posts: 28,661
Thanked 5,539 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
why don't we just cut their hands off, then they can never commit the crime again!!!
the numbers will lower, because the ones that choose to text and drive will just become much more sneaky and better at it.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 04:03 PM
|
#5 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,050
Thanked 3,063 Times in 1,182 Posts
|
Serious question - can you still get a ticket if you are pulled over to the right side of the road, stopped (but engine on), and using your cell phone?
__________________ Do Not Put Aftershave on Your Balls. -604CEFIRO Looks like I'm gonna have some hot sex again tonight...OOPS i got the 6 pack. that wont last me the night, I better go back and get the 24 pack! -Turbo E kinda off topic but obama is a dilf - miss_crayon Honest to fucking Christ the easiest way to get a married woman in the mood is clean the house and do the laundry.....I've been with the same girl almost 17 years, ask me how I know. - quasi |
| |
10-08-2014, 04:07 PM
|
#6 | Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 337
Thanked 224 Times in 84 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby Serious question - can you still get a ticket if you are pulled over to the right side of the road, stopped (but engine on), and using your cell phone? | Yes as long as the vehicle is in park and your parked safely off to the side
|
| |
10-08-2014, 04:45 PM
|
#7 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 36,439
Thanked 14,322 Times in 5,640 Posts
|
good, its like i said in another thread, want it to stop? hit people HARD
it really is an epidemic, not too long ago i saw an older couple, probably 45-55 driving on the highway, the man was driving woman in passenger seat, BOTH were on their phones, like wtf..
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
10-08-2014, 05:07 PM
|
#8 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Vαncouver
Posts: 1,510
Thanked 5,279 Times in 603 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby Serious question - can you still get a ticket if you are pulled over to the right side of the road, stopped (but engine on), and using your cell phone? | a buddy of mine got ticketed while we were just sitting in his car chatting, with keys in the ignition, everything off. He had his L at the time, so the officers ticketed him for the possibility of driving without an N. Officer told us to take the keys out of the ignition next time
you'll probably have to read through the BC's Motor Vehicle Act to ascertain
__________________ ♠♥♣♦ |
| |
10-08-2014, 05:14 PM
|
#9 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,859
Thanked 7,759 Times in 2,313 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer good, its like i said in another thread, want it to stop? hit people HARD
it really is an epidemic, not too long ago i saw an older couple, probably 45-55 driving on the highway, the man was driving woman in passenger seat, BOTH were on their phones, like wtf.. | No. The way enforcement of this law works, is completely broken. The police only ever target people who are at the low end risk of the totem pole. They only target drivers at stoplights.
This only perpetuates the problem, as now instead of only quickly glancing at their cell phones at a red light, people get scared of receiving a ticket. So instead now they wait to check their phones and fire off that text message until they drive away from the intersection with the police doing checks...
Seems stupid and ridiculous, but its the truth.
Think about it this way, a cars navigation system cannot be programmed while rolling but as soon as you come to a stop it allows you to continue using the functions. This is exactly how the law should be interpreted, and enforced.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 05:15 PM
|
#10 | I have named my kids VIC and VLS
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 36,439
Thanked 14,322 Times in 5,640 Posts
|
If you're checking it at a light you're Probsbly checking it while driving.
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
|
| |
10-08-2014, 05:25 PM
|
#11 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,859
Thanked 7,759 Times in 2,313 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer If you're checking it at a light you're Probsbly checking it while driving. | Okay, fine argument, although I can tell you that was definitely not the case with me.
But I can counter by saying, that the people that do both will simply continue to do it while driving, and they will check their phones more often while driving now because they can't do it while safely stopped at a red light.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 06:01 PM
|
#13 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Richmond
Posts: 666
Thanked 940 Times in 233 Posts
|
don't mind me shaving, changing shirts and a having a full meal all while driving... and still not be considered distracted driving...
Like Meme has said, they mostly target people who are stationary at a red light not driving along.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 06:37 PM
|
#14 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
|
^ hey, how many of us have missed lights because the idiots in front of us was busy texting and didnt see the light turn green ? Seems to be occurring more often.
distracted driving seems to be affecting us more and more now.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 07:11 PM
|
#15 | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,542
Thanked 652 Times in 346 Posts
|
All of this will be ancient when Google begins to commercially mass produce fully-automated self-driven cars in a few years.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 07:36 PM
|
#16 | MiX iT Up!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,133
Thanked 2,066 Times in 865 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer good, its like i said in another thread, want it to stop? hit people HARD
it really is an epidemic, not too long ago i saw an older couple, probably 45-55 driving on the highway, the man was driving woman in passenger seat, BOTH were on their phones, like wtf.. | They will never get caught by this law.
__________________ Sometimes we tend to be in despair when the person we love leaves us, but the truth is, it's not our loss, but theirs, for they left the only person who couldn't give up on them.
Make the effort and take the risk.. "Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." - Eleanor Roosevelt |
| |
10-08-2014, 07:40 PM
|
#17 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Richmond
Posts: 666
Thanked 940 Times in 233 Posts
|
^^ I see what you did there! Quote:
Originally Posted by willystyle All of this will be ancient when Google begins to commercially mass produce fully-automated self-driven cars in a few years. | I really wonder if Google Glass counts too??
|
| |
10-08-2014, 07:54 PM
|
#18 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 3,918
Thanked 3,235 Times in 1,221 Posts
|
Yeah this law is bullshit, I see cops at intersections all the time giving tickets for people texting, because that's where the high speed distracted collisions always happen. It's about as useful as ticketing drivers cruising at 10km over the limit on their way home from work claiming speed kills.
If they really cared about it more than just the revenue it brings in they'd target the people actually being unsafe. Go cruise up and down the highway in a undercover vehicle and pull over one of the many people who are looking down at their laps texting while going 120km/h, they're everywhere.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 08:56 PM
|
#19 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,799
Thanked 1,831 Times in 587 Posts
|
Were enforcing this law because it is not safe for you to operate your electronic devices while driving......but its fine for us because somehow it is safer is you have a badge and a gun to be able to work your laptop, radio and cell phone all while driving your car that has switches you need to be pressing to pull that guy you just ran on your computer, radioed in and txt'ed your partner about......yeah makes total sense.
Spidey made a valid point in another thread about officers having privileges the average person may not, but to enforce a law that is for our safety and yet do those exact things that make it unsafe makes no sense.
Where is the statistic about distracted police officers involved in accidents due to there electronic distractions. They are MORE distracted than a person changing there song or txting a buddy and pose a GREAT risk to other road users because of it.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 09:41 PM
|
#20 | i like gifs
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: imgur
Posts: 27,179
Thanked 7,785 Times in 2,695 Posts
|
The best one is when you drive beside a police cruiser and they're typing away on their laptop with one hand.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 09:44 PM
|
#21 | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Surrey
Posts: 966
Thanked 286 Times in 99 Posts
|
I don't see what all this complaining is about. No text is that important, regardless of who you are. If someone needs to reach you, they'll call.
There is no need to check your phone; even though your mommy may call you special, you aren't special enough to endanger people by taking your eyes off the road. Enough people get into accidents themselves while rubbernecking another accident on the road, we don't need to throw texting into the equation.
People can afford a nice bluetooth deck vs the price of a ticket these days. Maybe I was scared straight after riding as a passenger with a texting driver; too many close calls for my comfort. I think it's best we get rid of these drivers with heavy fines.
__________________ My Feedback (9-0-0)
If cats always land on their feet, and toast always lands butter side down, what would happen if you strapped burnt toast to the back of a cat and dropped it? |
| |
10-08-2014, 09:46 PM
|
#22 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,799
Thanked 1,831 Times in 587 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by boibuddha I don't see what all this complaining is about. No text is that important, regardless of who you are. If someone needs to reach you, they'll call.
There is no need to check your phone; even though your mommy may call you special, you aren't special enough to endanger people by taking your eyes off the road. Enough people get into accidents themselves while rubbernecking another accident on the road, we don't need to throw texting into the equation.
People can afford a nice bluetooth deck vs the price of a ticket these days. Maybe I was scared straight after riding as a passenger with a texting driver; too many close calls for my comfort. I think it's best we get rid of these drivers with heavy fines. | Dont disagree there, I dont think ANYONE should be doing these things while driving. Including the Police. If its dangerous for me its dangerous for them.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 09:56 PM
|
#23 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Vαncouver
Posts: 1,510
Thanked 5,279 Times in 603 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch28 The best one is when you drive beside a police cruiser and they're typing away on their laptop with one hand. | from BC's Motor Vehicle Act
Exceptions to prohibition — emergency personnel
214.3 Section 214.2 does not apply to the following persons who use an electronic device while carrying out their powers, duties or functions:
(a) a peace officer;
(b) a person driving or operating an ambulance as defined in the Emergency Health Services Act;
(c) fire services personnel as defined in the Fire Services Act.
__________________ ♠♥♣♦ |
| |
10-08-2014, 10:16 PM
|
#24 | Performance Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 15,337
Thanked 15,422 Times in 5,103 Posts
|
The worst is all the cars that have functions on them to read your damn texts out on a screen... I mean way to get busted by the wife talking to LG's, leave it to a bunch of engineers to not even consider that shit.
|
| |
10-08-2014, 10:20 PM
|
#25 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,799
Thanked 1,831 Times in 587 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by pinn3r from BC's Motor Vehicle Act
Exceptions to prohibition — emergency personnel
214.3 Section 214.2 does not apply to the following persons who use an electronic device while carrying out their powers, duties or functions:
(a) a peace officer;
(b) a person driving or operating an ambulance as defined in the Emergency Health Services Act;
(c) fire services personnel as defined in the Fire Services Act. | The exception is there, but it does not make it safe for them to do so.
I have seen, on two separate occasions, a police officer get in an accident because of these distractions. They want to make the road a safer place but in doing so they end up being part of the problem.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 AM. |