![]() |
2016 CAMARO |
rear looks awkward |
Five battles the 2016 Chevy Camaro needs to win http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/355d...Camaro-020.jpg Quote:
|
Can the windows get any smaller? I like the whole chopped roof look but from a practicality stand point what's a car with no outward visibility. Say NO to high beltlines! |
|
2.0L Turbo 270 hp and 295 lb.-ft 0-60mph: less than 6 seconds 30mpg highway |
That 2.0L turbo is more powerful than SR20DET! Shit! Nissan needs to come up with Silvia with new SR20 |
Quote:
As for this car, it looks like a huge improvement over everything the previous generation gave us. I think they definitely have a Mustang fighter with this one. Now it's up to Mopar to redesign their bathtub errr...Challenger |
|
reminds of Kia Forte Koup in some angles |
It does look angry though. |
fuck stop with the 4 banger muscle cars. I saw a new Mustang gun it at a green light today and instead of roaring it sounded like a Hyundai Elantra :rukidding: V8 or gtfo. Even a V6 is dumb and cheap looking. The redesign does look sweet though, i feel bad for the people that bought last years refresh. |
Quote:
i dont know though, the mustang with the 4 cylinder seems ok because its nothing new. the foxbody had a special version called the SVO which was a 2.3L turbo 4 as well.. i think gm fucked up by introducing the camaro with a 4cylinder. its wrong. what they should have done is developed a turbo 6 cylinder because of the good ol days of the grand national. |
GM experimented once with a 4-banger Camaro in the Iron Duke engine, and that was anemic as an option. But with today's tech it's way more relevant despite 4-cylinder muscle not making much sense. |
they've all looked the same as the 2006 concept to me.... /shrug |
Quote:
less than 6 seconds? They could make it faster with a 4 pot turbo. Timpo, can you quote where you got that 0-60mph figure? I couldn't find it in your links. |
My IS was bad for limited visibility/blind spots. The Camaro I sat in was 100% worse. |
Quote:
I think it's quite impressive for such a big car with small engine. That's like Porsche Boxster and Hyundai Genesis Coupe(3.8L V6 version) territory isn't it? Anyways, here's the link: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro Officially Unveiled, Now With 455HP V8, 2.0L Turbo |
Quote:
I did a few minutes of research and the 2013 Genesis Coupe is 6 seconds and the 2015 Boxter is 5.8 seconds, so the Camaro's "less than 6 seconds" for the 4 pot is good when compared to the Genesis, Boxster, etc. I was surprised, because I thought it would go at least somewhat quicker than the 6 seconds or high 5's, with the turbo technology nowadays and the lowered lbs. |
apparently Camaro will be much smaller than the current model. I don't know about that, American muscle cars are generally known as a big car and gives this road presence. But the new Camaro is trying to be small and be a sportscar like 370Z. http://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.corv...edde269129.jpg |
D-shaped steering wheel :drool: |
Amazing looking car. More stylish than last gen even with the face/butt lift. Interior looks premium but way too busy!! Just as bad as most Porches' IMHO lol |
Quote:
Where did you get the number for the boxster ..... My 03 boxster s does 0-60 in 5.4 ish seconds |
Quote:
Granted, it is probably quicker tested by third party reviewers and actual owners. |
Weird, I never understood why Porsche always puts lower numbers than the car actually has It will be interesting how well it can handle twisty roads and how it feels |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net