Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  | |
05-30-2015, 09:14 AM
|
#51 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 877
Thanked 345 Times in 167 Posts
Failed 18 Times in 13 Posts
|
The $250 will go definitely go a long way in filling the pockets of the execs' and their friends.
|
| |
05-30-2015, 10:59 AM
|
#52 | MiX iT Up!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,150
Thanked 2,074 Times in 870 Posts
Failed 642 Times in 183 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Come on guys, it's only going to cost you an extra $250 on average a year to vote Yes. $250 a year to get this huge upside is worth it imo.
That Yes vote would go a long way. Yeah, translink fucked up. Well we gotta live with it. Jimmy Pattison is going to look after the finances, he was the single reason why I voted Yes.
If you've ever drove in rush hour, you should vote yes. We need the infrastructure and it has to come from somewhere. |
__________________ Sometimes we tend to be in despair when the person we love leaves us, but the truth is, it's not our loss, but theirs, for they left the only person who couldn't give up on them.
Make the effort and take the risk.. "Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." - Eleanor Roosevelt |
| |
05-30-2015, 02:12 PM
|
#53 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Here! n There!
Posts: 4,149
Thanked 498 Times in 222 Posts
Failed 121 Times in 59 Posts
|
so i received my homeowners tax bill and what do i see...translink $hit tax or something like that....
NO to the 0.5% increase which i hope people voted...they already have a lot of sources for income...they just need to be more lean and efficient...
__________________ Go Canucks Go! |
| |
05-30-2015, 06:17 PM
|
#54 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,589
Thanked 3,051 Times in 826 Posts
Failed 412 Times in 112 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.HappySilp Jimmy Pattison HAVE 0 POWER. He is only there to advise not to actually run the finances. So translink and the mayors could just say no to what he suggested and there is nothing he can do.
How about taxing big corps and business instead? Want to build apartments close to skytrains? Sure it will cost you more.
I rather spend that $250 and bet on Canucks winning the Stanely Cup every year. Canucks have a higher chance of winning the cup than translink will use money effectively. | Why do people feel like taxing big corporations is the only way to do it? You tax them more, they simply just charge us more. The more you tax big corporations, guess what, they don't want to open up shop here. That means less jobs, less services, less everything. Taxing big corporations is not the solution. It's easy to say, but not realistic to do.
You would rather throw away $250 on the Canucks winning a cup they aren't going to win in years, then to spend it on potentially having a HUGE upside for our province???? I don't understand that.
Even if Jimmy is there to simply advise, is that not good enough? Who isn't going to listen to Jimmy? If you were a CEO of a company, and someone like Jimmy is giving you advice, and that advice is sound and logical, would you not listen to him?
Do you think that little of a CEO? I know Translink fucked some shit up, but we need to have a little faith right now. If Jimmy wasn't backing Translink, I wouldn't have voted Yes. The fact he put his name on it, that is all the validity I need. This isn't some media stunt, Jimmy isn't just doing this for publicity. Jimmy is old school and he doesn't fuck around. I'm sure the terms he negotiated included having some weight into what is going to happen. He's not going to jeopardize his reputation for anyone, Translink included.
If you haven't voted yet, please vote yes. You are essentially betting $250 a year that Translink won't fuck up and if they don't, they'll have a potential upside to the way you travel in the future. It's ONLY $250. I KNOW Translink fucked up, I get that. But, I firmly believe this is a no brainer.
IT'S ONLY $250 a year on average. Think of the upside.
|
| |
05-30-2015, 06:18 PM
|
#55 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,589
Thanked 3,051 Times in 826 Posts
Failed 412 Times in 112 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger_handheld | What's your beef with Jimmy Pattison?
|
| |
05-30-2015, 06:19 PM
|
#56 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,589
Thanked 3,051 Times in 826 Posts
Failed 412 Times in 112 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyzoomzoom The $250 will go definitely go a long way in filling the pockets of the execs' and their friends. | I'm curious, are you upset that Translink's CEO get's paid $70k a month? Is that your issue?
|
| |
05-30-2015, 08:46 PM
|
#57 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 635
Thanked 71 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 13 Times in 8 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter If you were a CEO of a company, and someone like Jimmy is giving you advice, and that advice is sound and logical, would you not listen to him? | In corporate level, it's not a decision between a CEO and an adviser. Did you miss the most important part which is the executive board? Sorry if I offended, but from this statement, you sound like you have no idea how large corporate works.....
|
| |
05-30-2015, 08:47 PM
|
#58 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 877
Thanked 345 Times in 167 Posts
Failed 18 Times in 13 Posts
|
I'm upset at the lack of accountability at Translink. There is zero public scrutiny of their books. The other crown corps aren't exactly angels either but at least there is some semblance of of a public review of BC Hydro, ICBC, etc.
And Jim Pattison is nothing more than a figure head in this process. All he gets to do is confirm that the $$ from this sales tax is being spent in the places where it was promised. He has no authority around whether the spend is prudent.
|
| |
05-30-2015, 09:55 PM
|
#59 | reads most threads with his pants around his ankles, especially in the Forced Induction forum.
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,645
Thanked 2,191 Times in 1,131 Posts
Failed 929 Times in 340 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Why do people feel like taxing big corporations is the only way to do it? You tax them more, they simply just charge us more. The more you tax big corporations, guess what, they don't want to open up shop here. That means less jobs, less services, less everything. Taxing big corporations is not the solution. It's easy to say, but not realistic to do.
You would rather throw away $250 on the Canucks winning a cup they aren't going to win in years, then to spend it on potentially having a HUGE upside for our province???? I don't understand that.
Even if Jimmy is there to simply advise, is that not good enough? Who isn't going to listen to Jimmy? If you were a CEO of a company, and someone like Jimmy is giving you advice, and that advice is sound and logical, would you not listen to him?
Do you think that little of a CEO? I know Translink fucked some shit up, but we need to have a little faith right now. If Jimmy wasn't backing Translink, I wouldn't have voted Yes. The fact he put his name on it, that is all the validity I need. This isn't some media stunt, Jimmy isn't just doing this for publicity. Jimmy is old school and he doesn't fuck around. I'm sure the terms he negotiated included having some weight into what is going to happen. He's not going to jeopardize his reputation for anyone, Translink included.
If you haven't voted yet, please vote yes. You are essentially betting $250 a year that Translink won't fuck up and if they don't, they'll have a potential upside to the way you travel in the future. It's ONLY $250. I KNOW Translink fucked up, I get that. But, I firmly believe this is a no brainer.
IT'S ONLY $250 a year on average. Think of the upside. | well $250 x 4 years that's $1000. I could go on a vacation with that. In fact $250 most likely will get you tickets to Los Vegas when there are deals. So no I don't want to give translink another penny.
Maybe if Translink didn't fuck up so many times we might have more faith in them. So no Translink should not get any additional funding till they prove to the pubic they have change.
If Translink shows any logic from their past they wouldn't be in this positions. The fact they fuck up so many times seems more likely they will contiune this trend even with Jim Pattison. Again Jim Pattison have 0 power as to how the money actually spends. He is just there to advice. Even if translink decides to use the new tax to give their CEO's bonus Jim Pattison can't stop them.
|
| |
05-30-2015, 10:27 PM
|
#60 | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: May 2001 Location: South Central V
Posts: 5,538
Thanked 519 Times in 210 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 21 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter What's your beef with Jimmy Pattison? | oh hey, I heard of a great deal to save us money! You should sign an exclusive agreement with pattison billboards for all advertising. They have an excellent rate which can show the public that we are saving money.
oh hey, perhaps you guys should fund this project for a skytrain that leads to the middle of nowhere, and build a free parking lot there so that people can drive their cars and park all day. what? that's next to a used car dealership? that makes it convenient for people to get a decent car to get them to the skytrain!
oh hey, we should send out information via radio. jr country is a great medium for informational dockets.
you know what would boost morale at the office? if we catered food from urban fare.
... and I like the guy too!
__________________ Visit my food blog! http://jaxandcs.com/ *its not the size of your army that matters; it's the fury of it's onslaught!* █♣█ |
| |
05-30-2015, 10:59 PM
|
#61 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: space
Posts: 3,524
Thanked 1,584 Times in 633 Posts
Failed 722 Times in 154 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.HappySilp Jimmy Pattison HAVE 0 POWER. He is only there to advise not to actually run the finances. So translink and the mayors could just say no to what he suggested and there is nothing he can do.
How about taxing big corps and business instead? Want to build apartments close to skytrains? Sure it will cost you more.
I rather spend that $250 and bet on Canucks winning the Stanely Cup every year. Canucks have a higher chance of winning the cup than translink will use money effectively. | $250 on the canucks every year to the cup................
__________________ http://i55.tinypic.com/jujz2q.gif Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 I went up to a cute chick and asked her if she'd let me take a photo of her for $30 she slapped me, she said to me that "I AIN'T A WHORE!"
But other than that I have seen every car on display in DTP just by cruising about in Richmond, thank you very much for collecting them together and get someone to sing a cover for "fuck you".
OH FUCK YOU OH OH OOOOH~ | Quote:
Originally Posted by Neva wtf man? what the hell kind of women do you go for? spca is for animals not dates... | |
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM. |