![]() |
Telus rolling out $1 billion fibre optic network across Vancouver Telus rolling out $1 billion fibre optic network across Vancouver We're getting fiber finally but only 150 mbps. That doesn't seem that much better. |
meh 1gbps at competitive rates or bust CRTC needs to let Google in...assuming they want in |
internet speeds and data cap is a joke in vancouver, just like how cell phone plans are, compared to the rest of the world. heck even ISPs out east provide better price vs performance ratio. at least telus is moving in the right direction. with the network upgrades, capacity for bandwidth is increased, hopefully in the "near" future better plans will be offered. |
|
Telus is more of "forced" to do this upgrade. They can't compete with what Shaw has, which is a very capable coax system and it is through out the city in every corner. Most of the neighborhoods in lower mainland are still on its traditional tel wires, which has hitting the wall for its limitation on offering clean and fast digital services. Shaw abandoned fiber to house/condo since last year. Docsis 3.1 will really get things started and Telus will spend the next 5 years try to catch up. |
don't they call their plans optik or something? so that it sounds like they provide fiber optic service but don't have to deliver fiber optic speeds |
Shaw already offers 250 mbp/s lol |
Quote:
|
^ movies can be downloaded in many different ways... such as paying? |
Quote:
|
With a 500GB cap. |
Quote:
Two of my good friends live right downtown TO, both pay more for slower internet service than I do in Burnaby Both are also paying as much as I do for cell service, with far less attached to their plans, especially data. Even in the states, some of the wireless carriers may have very cheap plans, but their coverage is shit. Only place I've ever legitamitely seen a huge improvement in both cost and service in cellular services was in Europe. Other than that I wouldn't really complain about my current services. Both in what I'm getting and the price |
Quote:
Like I said in another post concerning this topic, Canada is already lagging behind in the digital economy due to incompetent service and pricing, and will continue so, until this issue is addressed. |
Quote:
|
Urbanfibre Internet - Urbanfibre Not available to detached houses yet tho. If you live in a condo, I'd seriously give them a call. |
thats stupid because you can already get 100 mpbs off telus itself |
Quote:
|
Quote:
out in the east: Rogers: 250Mbps/20Mbps/unlimited - $94.99 Bell: 300Mbps/100Mbps/750GB - $95.95 out in the west? Shaw: 60Mbps/3Mbps/450GB $93 Telus: 100Mbps/20Mbps/500GB - $93 |
where is "out in the east" and my buddies with Rogers are paying like $75 for 20mb/s in downtown TO, so dunno why anyone would be paying that if those options were available? edit* Rogers current promo for Ontario: Quote:
|
umm donno y u started talkin about bundles, ive been talking about internet and internet all along, and even you specifically mentioned internet... besides the infrastructure upgrade to fibre will benefit INTERNET first and TV second. ur now comparing apples to oranges also if ur friends paying $75 for 20Mbps of internet from rogers then hes getting ripped off. a quick search on rogers site with a postal code M5T 1V1 from downtown toronto yields this, $75 for 60Mbps... http://i.imgur.com/fuRTO0c.jpg so yea.. no |
Wow, Shaw is $93 for 60. Ridiculous. |
Quote:
If you have too much density is also bad. Look at China. Most their Internet speed isn't much faster than a 10Mbps line and their cell phone most of them is still on 2g or 3g. If they allow faster connections it will kill their network. Overall I think Canada is a bit on the expensive side but we get what we pay for. My Shaw internet haven't gone down since years ago (due to power outage.) Same with my cell phone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Our cost will not come down until we have the population to support it, just like cell networks. It's more expensive because we have a very sparse population, and the infrastructure to cover that area costs a lot. Compared to somewhere like california where a population greater than all of canada lives in an area half the size of BC. Obviously more people paying for subscriptions, in a much smaller service area, is going to drastically reduce the cost. |
Quote:
EDIT: This was an article published by The Globe and Mail, where in 2012, the cost of delivering ONE GB of data to a consumer cost 3 cents/GB (after operating expenses) in Canada. This was back in 2012, you can bet your ass that it cost somewhere less than 1 cents/GB today in 2015, while at the same time, the cost of accessing internet has been increasing yearly. Make your own judgement. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/techn...article622177/ |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net