REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2018, 09:15 AM   #26
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovebacon View Post
after watching a bunch of videos about this. I stumble upon this video..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba1PslMNp6M

so is the roadster really up in space or was it just them testing the rockets launching and landing?
Are you kidding? The car wasn't on the head of the rocket without protection. What do you think was in the nose cone???

SMH

Berz out.
Advertisement
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 10:05 AM   #27
VAC Head Rotang Mod
 
Raid3n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Van
Posts: 10,668
Thanked 1,427 Times in 627 Posts
this was a test of the Heavy launch platform. they need to simulate the weight of a normal payload it would be expected to carry to get data from the flight. normally they would use cement etc. Elon was like "fuck it, send my car to mars".. so they used the tesla as the payload simulator. in a normal flight there would be a cargo pod of some sort inside the nose cone i imagine. they don't want it and the final stage engine getting hit by debris and the nose cone also improves aerodynamics reducing the power/fuel needed to reach orbit.

once in space where wind resistance is not an issue, they jettison the cone as it's not needed and the attitude control nozzles are probably in there as well.
__________________
2020 ND2 Miata - Polymetal Grey, Red Nappa Leather
1993 Subaru WRX (2004 WRX engine, COBB access port)
2001 CBR600F4i

My Feedback (10-0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fei-Ji View Post
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Raid3n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 10:57 AM   #28
nuggets mod
 
freakshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 7,051
Thanked 3,799 Times in 981 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ View Post
i know this launch was a success, but ultimately didn't they fuck up? I mean they were aiming for mars but it overshot into the asteroid field. It's like North Korea wanted to bomb the states, but missed and hit canada and calling it a success lol.

I know it wont happen but imagine them sending tourists up to the moon in the future, overshoot and the people head towards deep space lol.
Weeks (maybe months?) ago, they said they wanted to send it into Mars orbit, but that changed. Before launch, during the countdown, they showed the planned trajectory of the roadster, and it was indeed to the asteroid belt, not mars orbit.
__________________
I searched for truth, and all I found was You
freakshow is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-09-2018, 02:04 PM   #29
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,699
Thanked 4,571 Times in 1,717 Posts
This was honestly amazing to watch, I said the same thing initially when watching those two rockets land "is this CGI, or actually real"? It's amazing what we've been able to achieve, the wasting of those booster rockets was a major barrier in the past, now that they can re-used to easily changes everything.

I'm curious though, when listing to Elon at the post conference, his comments pertaining to visiting the moon made me seriously question if the first lunar landing was legitimate.

I'm surely no expect so certainly school me, but the way he described a mission to the moon, he iterated how much more research will be required to achieve such a feat. Doesn't SpaceX work with NASA directly? If we have already achieved a lunar landing, what further research logistically is required, one would think we have figured out any surprises or unknowns? Along with the technological advancements achieved since '69, he almost made it sound as though the endeavor has never been achieved, which really makes me question everything.

This is not a tinfoil hat post, I'm legitimately curious here. It would be interesting if SpaceX ends up not being able to complete a lunar landing in the future here, if not, it would seriously put into question the legitimacy of the actual initial landing itself.
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 04:34 PM   #30
what manner of phaggotry is this
 
RRxtar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kelownafornia
Posts: 18,285
Thanked 5,473 Times in 1,814 Posts
^ look how difficult it was and how many years it took for spaceX to reliably launch rockets, whereas NASA had been doing it for decades essentially flawlessly, including sending probes to Mars and precise orbits wherever they want. They aren't saying it but I think spaceX overshot Mars with this launch and are now saying they're going for the asteroid belt.

I think we take for granted how dialed in NASA has been and how incredibly difficult the feat of space travel actually is. There's a reason this launch was such a huge deal, but they've got a long way to go to catch up to NASA. They will get there for sure, but imagine what Nasa could do with a cold war sized budget again
__________________
STRENGTHaesthetics
RRxtar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 04:45 PM   #31
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemhg View Post
This was honestly amazing to watch, I said the same thing initially when watching those two rockets land "is this CGI, or actually real"? It's amazing what we've been able to achieve, the wasting of those booster rockets was a major barrier in the past, now that they can re-used to easily changes everything.

I'm curious though, when listing to Elon at the post conference, his comments pertaining to visiting the moon made me seriously question if the first lunar landing was legitimate.

I'm surely no expect so certainly school me, but the way he described a mission to the moon, he iterated how much more research will be required to achieve such a feat. Doesn't SpaceX work with NASA directly? If we have already achieved a lunar landing, what further research logistically is required, one would think we have figured out any surprises or unknowns? Along with the technological advancements achieved since '69, he almost made it sound as though the endeavor has never been achieved, which really makes me question everything.

This is not a tinfoil hat post, I'm legitimately curious here. It would be interesting if SpaceX ends up not being able to complete a lunar landing in the future here, if not, it would seriously put into question the legitimacy of the actual initial landing itself.
I just watched a video about this.

I have a hard time believing that with the Tech available at the time, we could have both gone to the moon AND come back with the craft and the people in tact.

I mean we can't figure this shit out NOW.

Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-09-2018, 05:42 PM   #32
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
J____'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
btw why is the live stream still showing it in earth's orbit? shouldn't it be way out now? or is the live stream a repeat
__________________
yolo
J____ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2018, 08:52 AM   #33
Ricer Mod
 
Berzerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smithers
Posts: 7,008
Thanked 5,276 Times in 1,501 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar View Post
^ look how difficult it was and how many years it took for spaceX to reliably launch rockets, whereas NASA had been doing it for decades essentially flawlessly, including sending probes to Mars and precise orbits wherever they want. They aren't saying it but I think spaceX overshot Mars with this launch and are now saying they're going for the asteroid belt.

I think we take for granted how dialed in NASA has been and how incredibly difficult the feat of space travel actually is. There's a reason this launch was such a huge deal, but they've got a long way to go to catch up to NASA. They will get there for sure, but imagine what Nasa could do with a cold war sized budget again
Space X could launch rockets into space no problem, it's the not wasting them that they cared about.

Also yes exceeded Mars orbit means they missed, and the path it will take them on will be to end up in the belt.

Berz out.
__________________
President of RS Beat Down Crew
Berzerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net