REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2018, 11:54 AM   #26
I have named my kids VIC and VLS
 
Hondaracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,226
Thanked 15,953 Times in 6,491 Posts
Failed 2,158 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
Hondaracer, I'd say the biggest "constraint" is always $$ -- as in, how much the prov gov is willing to put in to get something done.

It'd sure be nice to drive a Porsche. But when I am only willing / capable of buying a Hyundai, a Hyundai is what I'm going to get.
The congestion will cause the province wayyyyy more money than the initial investment in building an adequate bridge though
Advertisement
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
Hondaracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 11:59 AM   #27
linguistic ninja
 
CivicBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 16,687
Thanked 4,704 Times in 1,711 Posts
Failed 147 Times in 85 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
Hondaracer, I'd say the biggest "constraint" is always $$ -- as in, how much the prov gov is willing to put in to get something done.

It'd sure be nice to drive a Porsche. But when I am only willing / capable of buying a Hyundai, a Hyundai is what I'm going to get.
Sorry, but in Vancouver all you get is a bike
__________________
http://www.en.wikipedia.org

Still a card carrying member of the SFC :)
CivicBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-16-2018, 12:00 PM   #28
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 7,594
Thanked 7,360 Times in 3,002 Posts
Failed 257 Times in 143 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondaracer View Post
The congestion will cause the province wayyyyy more money than the initial investment in building an adequate bridge though
Agreed, but we can't really expect our politicians to exercise that much foresight or long term fiscal planning, can we?
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-16-2018, 12:10 PM   #29
MG1
Fathered more RS members than anybody else. Who's your daddy?
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,203
Thanked 11,832 Times in 5,078 Posts
Failed 317 Times in 203 Posts
So Translink was probably happy to hand things over to the province.

4 lanes, but divided, wider, and safer will most likely do it. Hopefully the roads around it are not going to cause congestion. Once on a four lane bridge, everything should move smoothly as long as the on and off ramps are designed properly. More lanes isn't always the answer. I hope they took potential ice bombs out of the equation. What do the First Nations think of this........ are we going to have to suck some ass? Maybe a blessing ceremony or two............ dozen.

I can see it now.......... some indian band will claim it is going to be built on sacred burial grounds and everything gets put on hold.
__________________
Quote:
"there but for the grace of god go I"
Quote:
Youth is, indeed, wasted on the young.
YODO = You Only Die Once.

Dirty look from MG1 can melt steel beams.

"There must be dissonance before resolution - MG1" a musical reference.
MG1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 12:15 PM   #30
Ready to be Man handled by RS!
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: richmond
Posts: 83
Thanked 60 Times in 23 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
The expansion to 6 lanes will probably never happen despite the available option so 4 lanes is what we get and that will be the max for the next 50 years.
If any sitting government tries to get the 2 lanes added at some point in the future, New West will cry about it until we are old and grey, lawsuits will delay any upgrade attempts like every other infrastructure project in BC. Just the usual BS.
stump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 12:35 PM   #31
SFICC-03*
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 8,907
Thanked 3,555 Times in 1,395 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 85 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by noclue View Post
Does it really need a bike lane/walkway.. I’ve never seen anyone use it
do you drive over this bridge during rush hour? i mean i wouldn't say it's busy with bike/pedestrian traffic, but in the summer i see at least a few people on it every time i drive over it. i used to bike over it and there were hardly if ever any instances where i wouldn't cross paths with another person.
unit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 12:41 PM   #32
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
bcedhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 604
Posts: 4,537
Thanked 1,770 Times in 559 Posts
Failed 335 Times in 77 Posts
people dont use it currently because the bridge is sketchy and there is a lack of facilities connecting the bridge to it.
bcedhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 01:35 PM   #33
Need my Daily Fix of RS
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 256
Thanked 302 Times in 91 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 10 Posts
it's a trap to go green. tax on gas will go up after it's built to pay for it, but congestion will be the same. people will be forced to carpool and use the fcking bike lane
123654123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 02:07 PM   #34
GS8
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
GS8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Fruit Loops
Posts: 3,801
Thanked 7,819 Times in 2,145 Posts
Failed 175 Times in 85 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 320icar View Post
What they need to do is turn Burnett’s/Columbia/front street into a highway 17 style ring road so you can easily drive from Vancouver/richmond/queensborough through new west to Coquitlam and highway 1. That would be way easier
Too many train tracks

New Worstminster knows how to engineer for the future

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GS8 View Post
When I think about ewe, I touch myself
GS8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 02:29 PM   #35
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 123654123 View Post
it's a trap to go green. tax on gas will go up after it's built to pay for it, but congestion will be the same. people will be forced to carpool and use the fcking bike lane
One could successfully argue that this is part of the end goal. Get more cars off the road by carpooling and using other means of transport. It's not an altogether bad idea so long as there are utilities in place allowing one to do so.
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 02:48 PM   #36
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,739
Thanked 5,282 Times in 1,946 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcedhk View Post
I think one of the reason for the 4 lane bridge is that it will take a substantial upgrade to adjacent arterial roads which will be a very difficult task price and land use changes
This.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 03:46 PM   #37
MG1
Fathered more RS members than anybody else. Who's your daddy?
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,203
Thanked 11,832 Times in 5,078 Posts
Failed 317 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GS8 View Post
Too many train tracks

New Worstminster knows how to engineer for the future

Look what kind of shit show happened when the Bailey bridge at whatsthatstreet needed replacement. They ordered it and found out it wasn't going to work, lol. This after months of delays.
__________________
Quote:
"there but for the grace of god go I"
Quote:
Youth is, indeed, wasted on the young.
YODO = You Only Die Once.

Dirty look from MG1 can melt steel beams.

"There must be dissonance before resolution - MG1" a musical reference.
MG1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 04:58 PM   #38
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Verdasco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rich City / Van
Posts: 3,841
Thanked 4,984 Times in 995 Posts
Failed 1,128 Times in 272 Posts
ffs.... instead of this project, BC should invest into more lanes for liongates. such a shit fest there
__________________
Quote:
Hey guys,

Can someone tell good or unusual dating spots? Or what was your the most unusual date? THanks for sharing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.HappySilp View Post
my bedroom =D
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhillon09 View Post
that's a great secret date spot,
i bet no girl in vancouver has seen it.
Verdasco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2018, 05:16 PM   #39
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
PiuYi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New West
Posts: 3,163
Thanked 1,341 Times in 557 Posts
Failed 206 Times in 108 Posts
does every bridge these days take a billion or two and half a decade to complete?
PiuYi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 11:34 AM   #40
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
mikemhg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,865
Thanked 6,618 Times in 2,432 Posts
Failed 285 Times in 121 Posts
I've said it once and I'll say it again. Our city council throughout the GVRD are full of complete shit. They want us to carpool more, they want us to use transit, or bike, and they want to implement a mobility tax. Yet one of the easiest solutions to ease congestion and encourage ride sharing, simply allow Uber, Lyft to come to this city and begin operating TODAY. But of course not, our city is too damn corrupt, it's an embarrassment with the traffic issues this city has, we're one of the last cities in North America to not allow such ride sharing. It is mind boggling to me the amount of shit we accept as citizens here.
mikemhg is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-18-2018, 07:28 PM   #41
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
PeanutButter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,591
Thanked 3,051 Times in 826 Posts
Failed 412 Times in 112 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum View Post
Bear in mind that with the newer, wider lanes, travel speed will be faster and safer. Accidents and how traffic will be impeded will reduce, and there wouldn't be nightly lane closures either. Plus, with the dedicated walking and biking lanes, I'm sure the new bridge would already be substantially wider than the existing one.

Of course having 3 lanes each way would be nice, but the constrains and requirements might not make them feasible.
I feel that because the lanes are narrower on patullo, it's safer. It's hard to speed on the patullo because of how narrow it is.

When I'm on the Alex Fraser, people are FLYING over that bridge. I feel safer on the patullo versus the alex fraser.

So i'm not sure that widening the lanes are actually safer.
PeanutButter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2018, 08:04 PM   #42
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
Traum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 7,594
Thanked 7,360 Times in 3,002 Posts
Failed 257 Times in 143 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter View Post
I feel that because the lanes are narrower on patullo, it's safer. It's hard to speed on the patullo because of how narrow it is.

When I'm on the Alex Fraser, people are FLYING over that bridge. I feel safer on the patullo versus the alex fraser.

So i'm not sure that widening the lanes are actually safer.
The safety bit comes from whether 2 vehicles in adjacent lanes would graze each other. Especially with trucks of any kind -- and triply so for those with trailers -- the lanes are so narrow that there is no room to navigate within your lane. Esp around the bend where the Pattullo kind of turns into King George, I've had / seen more than a few close calls where the idiot driver almost veered into the adjacent lane because it is so narrow.

With Alex Fraser, yes, people are flying over that bridge, and the merging part could get a bit scary, but at least you don't have to stay on your toes when you are driving straight within your own lane. You have to do that on the Pattullo.
Traum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net