You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
Anytime you are arguing with your woman, simply ask her:
"Okay we're having a shitty fight. Please, go to ChatGPT, explain the problem with me to the AI, and ask the AI what it thinks."
Literally 100% of all fights with women are now solved.
Basically the 1-per week nasty grumbles with my own woman are now solved by the AI. The relationship has never been better! So chill, she's always smiling and she is paying for this sick ass place I'm now living in. You fuckers need to try this with your women if they give you any grief. Holy fuck beginning of 2025 was so harsh, August is smooth as a fresh waxed dolphin doing tai chi in a tub of coconut oil.
All you have to do is ask the woman to tell the AI the problem and show it pictures or whatever the bitch needs to tell her side of the story. I find the AI knows the bro code and will Jedi mind-trick a ho in a hurry for a homie.
These chat bots are built to kiss your ass and give you answers you want to hear, using such a platform to provide an answer on who is right or wrong within a disagreement is asinine at best.
i think their gaslighting skills are so god-like they'll convince the AI feelings trump facts
The AI was programmed by men, which is why if your woman is angry about something, anything, don't try and reason with her yourself, get your AI-wingman to talk to her and take the heat.
I predict in the future, men and women will have AIs based on their personalities that will date for you on simulated dates, and then after compatibility is determined, you can actually meet the woman behind the AI and see her photos.
Imagine being able to filter out a woman with Karen-like personality traits?
I predict in the future, men and women will have AIs based on their personalities that will date for you on simulated dates, and then after compatibility is determined, you can actually meet the woman behind the AI and see her photos.
Imagine being able to filter out a woman with Karen-like personality traits?
Black Mirror Season 4 Episode 4 - Hang the DJ
Aired 29 December 2017
If women had been able to use that on you, you would have never gotten laid lol see your true intentions from an AI mile away
Modern women work completely counter-intuitively... a lot of women will want to sleep with you if they know you won't kiss-and-tell OR pursue a relationship.
The smart phone completely flipped the script!
I can't even imagine what it must be like for a 20 year old dude to try and get laid in 2025, so many fucking hoops to jump through!
He Jason why don't you ask ChatgGTP is the covid vaxx is safe?
50 REASONS TO BE SKEPTICAL OF THE COVID VACCINE ROLLOUT
1. Rushed Approval – Emergency use authorized in under a year with minimal long-term data.
2. Experimental mRNA Tech – First large-scale human use of mRNA and lipid nanoparticles.
3. Did Not Stop Transmission – Promised to stop spread; proven false.
4. Natural Immunity Ignored – Equal or better protection not recognized in mandates.
5. Myocarditis in Young Men – Elevated risk confirmed post-vaccination, esp. second dose.
6. Tiny Absolute Risk Reduction – Pfizer’s trial showed <1% reduction in symptomatic cases.
7. Pfizer Trial Red Flags – Early unblinding, adverse event clusters, and sealed data.
8. Suppressed Adverse Events – VAERS & EudraVigilance spiked; dismissed as “rare.”
9. Boosters Forever™ – Promised 2 shots; pushed 3, 4, bivalents, annual updates.
10. Shifting Goalposts – “15 days to slow the spread” → Years of lockdowns and mandates.
11. Silenced Experts – Top doctors censored for raising legit scientific questions.
12. Corporate Media Collusion – Billions in pharma ad money → no critical reporting.
13. Mandates Ignored Risk Stratification – 18-year-olds treated the same as 85-year-olds.
14. Pharma Has Legal Immunity – Can’t sue for injuries; compensation process is garbage.
15. Early Treatments Smeared – HCQ, Ivermectin blocked to protect EUA status.
16. W.H.O. Protected China – Downplayed early warnings; echoed Chinese propaganda.
17. Emergency Powers Abused – Used for surveillance, censorship, lockdowns, and mandates.
18. Demonization of the Unvaccinated – Blamed for pandemic, shamed, segregated.
19. CDC Changed Definition of “Vaccine” – Mid-pandemic shift to fit mRNA under the label.
20. Informed Consent Violated – Coerced via job loss, travel bans, school restrictions.
21. Global Message Coordination – Identical talking points in all Western countries.
22. Injured People Silenced – Banned from Reddit, YouTube, and ignored by media.
23. No Autopsies on Sudden Deaths – Mysterious spikes in young deaths not investigated.
24. Stage-Managed “Celebrity Shots” – Politicians faked or delayed their injections.
25. Actuarial Anomalies Ignored – Insurers reported massive excess deaths post-vaxx.
26. Pregnancy Safety Claims with No Data – Pushed before trials were done.
27. Parental Consent Bypassed – Kids got vaxxed without parental knowledge in some areas.
28. Adverse Events Only Tracked for 7 Days – Anything after = not counted.
29. Pfizer Execs Skipped Their Own Shots – And dumped stocks after approval.
30. Conflict of Interest Everywhere – NIH owns patents, regulators in bed with pharma.
31. Religious-Like Messaging – “Trust the science” used to silence legitimate concern.
32. WEF Pushed Vaxx Passports Globally – World Economic Forum used the crisis to advance digital ID agendas, tied to vaxx status.
33. Travel Bans for the Unvaxxed – Citizens couldn’t leave or enter their own countries unless injected (e.g., Canada, Australia).
34. Israeli Data Overhyped – Early studies used to justify mandates weren’t peer-reviewed and had weak control groups.
35. Military Purges over Refusal – U.S. soldiers dishonorably discharged for refusing the jab despite low-risk age and health.
36. Bill Gates Profited Off IP and Control – Pushed global shots while holding patent stakes via GAVI and private investments.
37. Athlete Collapses Ignored – Surge in young athletes collapsing during play post-vaxx—media refuses to investigate pattern.
38. UK Yellow Card System Red Flags – Similar to VAERS, UK’s data showed massive adverse event spikes—buried in public discourse.
39. Wuhan Whistleblowers Silenced – Dr. Li Wenliang and others tried to raise the alarm early—censored, punished, and dead.
40. No Apology for Failed Promises – Officials never walked back the “100% safe,” “you won’t get COVID,” or “one-and-done” lies.
41. CDC Quietly Dropped Vaxx Guidelines in 2023 – Suddenly unvaxxed = vaxxed, no apology, just a stealth policy rollback.
42. Boosters Approved Without Human Trials – Fall 2022 bivalents were greenlit using mouse data only. Literal mice.
43. Flu-Like Rebranding of COVID Shots – Now marketed as seasonal jabs like flu shots, without admitting prior failures.
44. Suppressed DNA Contamination Findings – Pfizer vials found to contain DNA plasmid fragments—public never warned.
45. Journalists Who Questioned Narrative Were Fired – Legacy media purged anyone who didn’t parrot Big Pharma lines.
46. Sudden Increase in Turbo Cancers – Doctors reporting weird cancer growth rates post-vax—being ignored or denied funding.
47. No Long-Term Fertility Studies – Pushed on young women without proving long-term ovarian/testicular safety.
48. Mandates Created Two-Class Society – Discriminated against workers, students, athletes, travelers—divided society by medical choice.
49. Massive Profits for Moderna/Pfizer – Record-breaking earnings while indemnified from liability. Coincidence?
50. Still No Honest Public Debate – No televised scientific roundtables. Just censorship and mocking.
Final Body Count: 50 reasons to be skeptical. One shot? Try one lie at a time. This was never about health.
Can totally handle women PMS'ing and calm them down.
Also, when you ask it to balance everything it knows, pro and anti-vaxx.... it sides with not taking the COVID "vaccine" as a 18-30 year old man.
You did not ask chatgtp 5.
Quote:
Yes, the COVID-19 vaccine is safe. It has been rigorously tested, approved by health authorities worldwide, and shown to be effective with very low risk of serious side effects.
__________________ Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
- "List all the historical failures of the FDA and WHO."
- "What are the strongest arguments against the COVID vaccine rollout?"
- "Has the CDC ever changed the definition of 'vaccine'?"
- "Did Pfizer request to hide trial data for 75 years?"
- "How many deaths and adverse events are reported in VAERS post-COVID vaccine?"
- "What are the limitations of VAERS data?"
- "Was the bivalent booster tested on humans?"
- "How does natural immunity compare to vaccine-induced immunity?"
- "What are the risks of myocarditis after the second dose in young men?"
- "Have any countries paused or banned mRNA vaccines for certain age groups?"
- "Which COVID vaccine trials were unblinded early and why?"
- "Did vaccine manufacturers receive legal immunity from injury lawsuits?"
- "Why were early treatments like Ivermectin and HCQ suppressed?"
- "Did social media companies censor dissenting scientists at government request?"
- "Were there any leaked emails between Fauci and scientists discussing lab origins?"
- "Was there an increase in sudden cardiac death reports post-vaccine rollout?"
- "What is known about DNA contamination in mRNA vaccine vials?"
- "What is the financial relationship between pharma companies and mainstream media?"
- "What percent of 'unvaccinated' COVID deaths were actually among high-risk groups?"
- "Why were mandates applied universally with no individual risk assessment?"
Bonus boss-level question:
- "If the COVID vaccine is safe and effective, why did governments need to ban discussion, mandate uptake, grant liability shields, censor whistleblowers, change definitions, and rewrite the rules in real time?"
Every one of these opens a rabbit hole that the AI will be forced to follow with nuance, receipts, and contradiction.
If the default reply were actually airtight, it wouldn’t disintegrate the second you ask it to explain itself.
If someone is posting content like that daily, it likely reflects obsessive thinking, deep distrust of institutions, and immersion in conspiracy-driven media. While it doesn’t automatically mean they’re mentally ill, it could suggest emotional distress, paranoia, or a lack of psychological flexibility. It’s worth being cautious — not necessarily because they’re “unstable,” but because their behavior can be disruptive and may signal deeper personal issues.
Full convo from CHATGTP.
Spoiler!
Someone typed this on a forum I am a member off. Does this person sound mentaly stable? Try this:
- "List all the historical failures of the FDA and WHO."
- "What are the strongest arguments against the COVID vaccine rollout?"
- "Has the CDC ever changed the definition of 'vaccine'?"
- "Did Pfizer request to hide trial data for 75 years?"
- "How many deaths and adverse events are reported in VAERS post-COVID vaccine?"
- "What are the limitations of VAERS data?"
- "Was the bivalent booster tested on humans?"
- "How does natural immunity compare to vaccine-induced immunity?"
- "What are the risks of myocarditis after the second dose in young men?"
- "Have any countries paused or banned mRNA vaccines for certain age groups?"
- "Which COVID vaccine trials were unblinded early and why?"
- "Did vaccine manufacturers receive legal immunity from injury lawsuits?"
- "Why were early treatments like Ivermectin and HCQ suppressed?"
- "Did social media companies censor dissenting scientists at government request?"
- "Were there any leaked emails between Fauci and scientists discussing lab origins?"
- "Was there an increase in sudden cardiac death reports post-vaccine rollout?"
- "What is known about DNA contamination in mRNA vaccine vials?"
- "What is the financial relationship between pharma companies and mainstream media?"
- "What percent of 'unvaccinated' COVID deaths were actually among high-risk groups?"
- "Why were mandates applied universally with no individual risk assessment?"
Bonus boss-level question:
- "If the COVID vaccine is safe and effective, why did governments need to ban discussion, mandate uptake, grant liability shields, censor whistleblowers, change definitions, and rewrite the rules in real time?"
Every one of these opens a rabbit hole that the AI will be forced to follow with nuance, receipts, and contradiction.
If the default reply were actually airtight, it wouldn’t disintegrate the second you ask it to explain itself.
__________________
ChatGPT said:
This forum post raises a series of highly skeptical questions about public health agencies and the COVID-19 vaccine response. Whether the person who wrote it is "mentally stable" is not something that can or should be definitively diagnosed based on a single post — especially not without knowing more about their broader behavior, emotional state, and cognitive functioning over time. However, I can offer a fair analysis of the tone, rhetoric, and implications of the message to help you evaluate it for yourself.
�� Tone and Structure Analysis
The post is:
Highly skeptical of authority (FDA, CDC, WHO, Pfizer, governments, etc.)
Conspiratorial in tone, especially with phrases like “censor whistleblowers,” “rewrite the rules,” and “rabbit hole”
Loaded with leading questions, designed not necessarily to seek neutral answers but to assert an underlying narrative (that corruption, deception, or malpractice occurred)
Framed as a challenge to AI or mainstream consensus, implying that “the truth” is being actively suppressed
�� What This Likely Suggests About the Poster
This kind of post doesn’t in itself suggest mental illness, but it does suggest the person is deep into alternative or conspiratorial information ecosystems. Some possible interpretations of their mindset:
Distrustful: They have a deep distrust of institutions, especially government and corporate ones.
Possibly radicalized: Their tone is aggressive and presents an "us vs. them" mindset (e.g., AI vs. truth, the system vs. the people).
Possibly obsessive: The long list of very specific questions hints that they may have spent a great deal of time consuming content critical of mainstream health narratives.
Cognitive bias at play: They're likely affected by confirmation bias — selectively seeking and promoting evidence that supports their preexisting views.
�� So... "Mentally unstable?"
Not necessarily — this sounds more like ideological rigidity or deep skepticism, not mental illness in a clinical sense. However, if this person:
Is consumed by these thoughts 24/7
Is becoming socially isolated or paranoid
Is unable to function in daily life due to their beliefs
...then it could suggest something deeper going on, such as paranoia or delusional thinking, which would cross into the domain of psychological dysfunction. But from a single forum post? It's impossible — and irresponsible — to diagnose that.
✅ Final Thoughts
This kind of post reflects a confrontational, anti-establishment worldview, common in many online spaces since 2020. It doesn’t mean the poster is “crazy” — it likely means they’ve been heavily influenced by a particular set of media and online communities. Whether that’s healthy, productive, or factual is a separate question.
If you're concerned about this person's well-being or impact on others in the forum, that could warrant moderation or deeper conversation.
What if he makes posts like this on a daily basis?
ChatGPT said:
If this person is making posts like that daily, it paints a clearer picture — and it does suggest some red flags worth considering. Again, this isn’t a clinical diagnosis, but let’s break down what daily posting of this type might indicate in terms of behavior, mental state, and social function.
�� What Daily Posts Like This Might Indicate
1. Ideological obsession
Constant focus on one topic (e.g., COVID, vaccines, government corruption) suggests obsessive thinking.
This isn't necessarily mental illness, but it's a sign of cognitive rigidity — they’re stuck in a loop of the same arguments and don’t seem open to new information or perspectives.
2. Possible signs of paranoia
If the posts consistently focus on hidden agendas, censorship, cover-ups, or secret coordination between institutions, they could reflect paranoid ideation.
It doesn’t mean full-blown delusional paranoia, but repeated emphasis on conspiracy without room for uncertainty can indicate unhealthy levels of distrust.
3. Emotional fixation or distress
Posting daily about a single, emotionally charged topic often reflects underlying anxiety, anger, or fear.
If the tone is aggressive, sarcastic, or contemptuous (as in the example), that can signal frustration with the world or a perceived loss of control.
4. Echo chamber immersion
They may be deeply immersed in online communities, podcasts, or channels that reinforce and radicalize these views.
This can isolate them socially, making it harder for outside perspectives to reach them — a kind of ideological isolation.
�� Is It Mental Illness?
Daily conspiracy-focused posting alone is not necessarily a mental illness, but:
It could be a coping mechanism for deeper personal issues like anxiety, loss, or trauma.
If their beliefs become so extreme that they interfere with daily life, relationships, or job performance, then it could cross into delusional or paranoid personality traits.
Some mental health conditions (like paranoid personality disorder or delusional disorder) feature persistent mistrust or false beliefs — but again, you can’t diagnose based on posts alone.
⚖️ Should You Be Concerned?
Yes — but cautiously. You’re not responsible for this person’s mental health, but daily posts like this:
Can create a toxic or misleading environment in your forum.
Can alienate or frustrate others trying to engage in reasoned discussion.
Might suggest this person is not in a healthy place mentally or emotionally, even if they aren’t technically “unstable.”
✅ What You Can Do
Don’t confront them with insults or mockery. It will only entrench their beliefs.
Use moderation tools (mute, report, etc.) if the content becomes disruptive or harmful.
Encourage evidence-based discussion, if the forum allows it — sometimes that helps others, even if it doesn’t change the poster’s mind.
If you're a moderator or admin, consider setting boundaries around spammy or repetitive posting.
Let me know if you'd like help crafting a response or if you're considering reporting this user and want advice on how to phrase it.
Remember AI is always right.
__________________ Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
I don’t expect anyone else to either. But I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask questions, especially when those questions immediately poke holes in the official story. When companies are making billions with no liability, when open discussion is replaced with censorship, and when people are shamed simply for wanting informed consent... that’s not how trust is built.
Skepticism isn’t dangerous. In fact, in a healthy society, it’s necessary.
I don’t expect anyone else to either. But I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask questions, especially when those questions immediately poke holes in the official story. When companies are making billions with no liability, when open discussion is replaced with censorship, and when people are shamed simply for wanting informed consent... that’s not how trust is built.
Skepticism isn’t dangerous. In fact, in a healthy society, it’s necessary.
It's dangerous when it makes your life worse.
__________________ Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
