View Full Version
:
2009 BC Lions
Not looking good. How to beat a team that scores on every possession........
Two turnovers already. Oh well. I just hope it doesn't turn into an embarrassing loss.
asahai69
11-22-2009, 09:58 AM
season is over unless they pull sumthin amazing out their asses
Gh0stRider
11-22-2009, 10:13 AM
31-10 MTL
2nd quarter
:(
B.C. Leaders:
Passing: Casey Printers 10/14 108 YDS
Rushing: Martell Mallett 4 CAR 8 YDS
Receiving: Ryan Grice-Mullen 2 REC 39 YDS
Montreal Leaders:
Passing: Anthony Calvillo 9/11 212 YDS
Rushing: Andrew Hawkins 1 CAR 18 YDS
Receiving: Kerry Watkins 2 REC 94 YDS
Montreal's front four is solid. AC takes credit for all the offence, but he is given a lot of time to throw to a receiving corp that is second to none. Their defence is doing alright, too.
I can't see the Lions making any kind of comeback. Even if they score on every possession.
Stranger things have happened. Perhaps a few key Montreal injuries might give them a chance.
quasi
11-22-2009, 10:28 AM
They should have the mercy rule at half time, the Lions are done. If it's any consulation the Shithawks are playing worse.
The Lions don't deserve to be in this game. I can't believe they didn't get at least 3 points on the turnover just before the end of the first half. They could have gotten 7 points. Chances like that don't come up often. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
carisear
11-22-2009, 10:45 AM
fail game. i can't see a comeback with the way the defense is playing. =(
and what is with the EASY DROPS! UGH! right in the bread basket, and they can't hold onto the ball.
Gh0stRider
11-22-2009, 11:41 AM
38-18
3rd
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
I hope AC gets the all time record for touchdowns in a single playoff game. He's tied with half a dozen other QB's at 5 TD's. It's really not that hard to do when you're playing such a weaksauce team like this year's Lions.
Damn, Duval just misses the 3 pointer. I was thinking a 50+ point score for Montreal. If htey wanted to, I'm sure they could have put up 60 points on the scoreboard. I guess that would be too much of an insult to the other team. I guess no sense in risking injury. They need to save themselves for upcoming games.
Bwahahahahaha............... 55-18. The Lions are making it too easy.
What? That's highway robbery! It was a............. wait! A counter challenge. LOL.
EDIT: Can you challenge a counter challenge if the challenge is for a different reason?
Eff-1
11-22-2009, 12:01 PM
change the channel right now and you might see baltimore hand indy their first lost of the season -- if they can manage the field goal. go go go.
Eff-1
11-22-2009, 12:02 PM
never mind. they fumbled.
man what a lousy football day.
Well, there's always the Canucks....... they're on tonight.
Gh0stRider
11-22-2009, 12:08 PM
GG
Getting ugly.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
quasi
11-22-2009, 12:32 PM
Well, there's always the Canucks....... they're on tonight.
There were a bunch of great NFL games so far today. Two OT's and the Detroit Lions won the game on the last play after the Browns picked the ball off in the endzone but took a pass interference penalty on a hailmary pass with no time left on the clock. Can't end on a penalty so Det got one last crack at it from the one yardline down by 6 and won the game.
carisear
11-22-2009, 01:01 PM
^^
WOW great ending to a game ... that nobody prolly watched.
actually as bad as the detroit lions AND browns are this year... they could've easily killed the BC lions today ... playing cfl rules at that.
well next year is promising, as long as we overhaul our defense!
canucks 100% of the time now!
InvisibleSoul
11-23-2009, 12:47 AM
actually as bad as the detroit lions AND browns are this year... they could've easily killed the BC lions today ... playing cfl rules at that.
They better be able to... I mean, the CFL is to the NFL like the AHL is to the NHL, isn't it?
Vansterdam
11-23-2009, 06:04 AM
epic fail
Tapioca
11-23-2009, 08:13 AM
They better be able to... I mean, the CFL is to the NFL like the AHL is to the NHL, isn't it?
Ummm, no. Aside from having only 3 downs, the CFL has:
- Larger field (width and length) and larger end zones
- 20 second play clock
- The single point
- Two men allowed in motion before the ball is in play
- No 'fair catch' meaning the receiving team after a kickoff must make play with the ball
One game is not necessarily better or more high-calibre than the other. But players in the NFL, even though they might be more skilled, are not always able to make the transition to the CFL and vice versa.
Soundy
11-23-2009, 08:20 AM
"CFL: We Have Bigger Balls"
asahai69
11-23-2009, 09:31 AM
buono shouldnt have dressed the cheerleaders to play defence. epic fail on his part
InvisibleSoul
11-23-2009, 10:05 AM
Ummm, no. Aside from having only 3 downs, the CFL has:
- Larger field (width and length) and larger end zones
- 20 second play clock
- The single point
- Two men allowed in motion before the ball is in play
- No 'fair catch' meaning the receiving team after a kickoff must make play with the ball
One game is not necessarily better or more high-calibre than the other. But players in the NFL, even though they might be more skilled, are not always able to make the transition to the CFL and vice versa.
Obviously I know that there are differences between the two games... and I would even accept that some NFL players may not possibly transition to the CFL very well... but NFL is not more high-calibre than the CFL? You've got to be kidding me. Nevermind the fact that it always seems like most CFL players would jump at the chance at playing in the NFL, the average salary of a CFL player is like less than $100k, whereas the average salary of an NFL player is closer to $800k.
I mean, that's like saying the Swedish Elite League for hockey is not lower calibre than the NHL just because they play on a bigger rink and may have a few different rules.
Soundy
11-23-2009, 11:17 AM
Higher pay doesn't necessarily mean it's a higher-caliber game, or even higher-caliber players. All it REALLY means is that they have better marketing, thus bigger sponsors, thus more money to throw around. Yes, more money means they're able to attract better players... doesn't mean the GAME is any better, or that ALL the players are necessarily better. There's a lot more cult-of-personality as well; many players make more because they themselves are marketed more.
I mean, look at soccer - look at what LA pays Beckham to play there (very rarely). Is he REALLY that much better than everyone else in the MLS? No. It's the name they're paying for, and the draw that it brings.
InvisibleSoul
11-23-2009, 11:42 AM
Higher pay doesn't necessarily mean it's a higher-caliber game, or even higher-caliber players. All it REALLY means is that they have better marketing, thus bigger sponsors, thus more money to throw around. Yes, more money means they're able to attract better players...
Doesn't the last sentence completely contradict everything else preceeding it? No, higher pay doesn't GUARANTEE higher calibre, but it's a pretty safe correlation to make.
doesn't mean the GAME is any better, or that ALL the players are necessarily better.
Once again, it's not guaranteed that the GAME with higher calibre players is better than a game with lower calibre players, but once again, it is pretty safe to believe it should be. Are ALL the players in the NFL better than ALL the players in the CFL? Probably not. But I wouldn't be surprised if ALMOST all are. I mean, seriously... how many players in the CFL would choose not to play in the NFL if they had the choice?
There's a lot more cult-of-personality as well; many players make more because they themselves are marketed more.
Sure... but you still have to have the skill to back it up, at least to a certain degree. All the marketing in the world isn't going to keep you in the NFL if you can't cut the mustard on the field.
I mean, look at soccer - look at what LA pays Beckham to play there (very rarely). Is he REALLY that much better than everyone else in the MLS? No. It's the name they're paying for, and the draw that it brings.
This is a special case, definitely not the norm. 99% of the players in the NFL are being paid for what they bring to the field, not because of their fan appeal.
Look, the bottom line is this... even though CFL and NFL are not identical games, the core is still the same. I think it's ridiculous to even dispute that the overall skill level in the NFL is not miles ahead of the CFL.
In general, CFL is a league that players not good enough for the NFL play in. In this way, I think it is similar to the AHL compared to the NHL.
Gt-R R34
11-23-2009, 11:51 AM
Tend to agree with invisiblesoul.
Wouldn't it be a safer comparison, saying like KHL and the NHL, different rules, same type of game. But in terms of quality NHL > KHL.
In essence, NFL > CFL because of similiar reasoning.
InvisibleSoul
11-23-2009, 12:06 PM
Tend to agree with invisiblesoul.
Wouldn't it be a safer comparison, saying like KHL and the NHL, different rules, same type of game. But in terms of quality NHL > KHL.
In essence, NFL > CFL because of similiar reasoning.
I'm not saying that the AHL-NHL comparison is a perfect one... but it gets the point across. The CFL is a league where, in general, players who aren't good enough for the NFL play. The AHL is a league where, in general, players who aren't good enough for the NHL play. That's all I was trying to express.
Just to recap, this all stems from the comment that carisear made implying that the BC Lions would have lost to the worst teams in the NFL the way they played yesterday... implying that normally, the BC Lions are better than some NFL teams. I refuse to believe that this is true.
I'm saying that there is no way the skill level of a CFL team is anywhere close to that of ANY NFL team.
I found an old debate about CFL vs NFL... most of the arguments are the same as here: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=97566
quasi
11-23-2009, 12:56 PM
I love my football, probably even more then hockey and I'm a HUGE hockey fan. I grew up with CFL, used to go to all the Rider games with my dad when we lived there. I still love both games but the more and more I watch NFL the more it's becoming my favorite sports league. I think you guys are making to much out of the comment, the Browns and the Det Lions are the armpit of the NFL. He was just saying even as armpit teams they'd still whoop the BC Lions playing with there rules which is true. I hate these debates, both games are great in there own way.
Getting back to the CFL the Riders are going to have a hell of a time making a game out of it but here's to hoping they pull off the upset. I can guarantee that it will be closer then 38 points, you can take that to the bank. :)
Soundy
11-23-2009, 01:37 PM
I love my football, probably even more then hockey and I'm a HUGE hockey fan. I grew up with CFL, used to go to all the Rider games with my dad when we lived there. I still love both games but the more and more I watch NFL the more it's becoming my favorite sports league. I think you guys are making to much out of the comment, the Browns and the Det Lions are the armpit of the NFL. He was just saying even as armpit teams they'd still whoop the BC Lions playing with there rules which is true.
Nothing to do with "relative player talent" and everything to do with the different rules - NFL players would still go for third and long because they'd be expecting a fourth down.
Neither league or style has a lock on talent - yes, there are CFL players who couldn't make it in the NFL. There are also NFL players - and coaches, for that matter - who couldn't cut it in the CFL.
And there are are those who excelled at both - Doug Flutie anyone? Let's not forget, the holder of SEVERAL major-league points records - football or otherwise - is a CFL player AND career Lion... perhaps you've heard of him, Lui Passaglia? You know, the original "Luuuuuuuuuuuuu!"
It's not just different rules, it's different styles of play. NFL play is a lot more rigid, more stick-to-the-playbook; CFL with its much wider field allows for (and encourages) a lot more "freestyle" play. One of the problems many CFLers have had trying out in the NFL isn't the lack of talent, but the difficulty in playing lock-step to the playbook. Same goes the other way, and it can be overcome with time... problem is, the NFL doesn't allow players the time to adjust; there are so many other roid-monkey college players ready to step up, who've been brought up in that style of play.
Getting back to the CFL the Riders are going to have a hell of a time making a game out of it but here's to hoping they pull off the upset. I can guarantee that it will be closer then 38 points, you can take that to the bank. :)
Go Als, I say. Not any particular love for them, so much as utter contempt for the Wheaties.
InvisibleSoul
11-23-2009, 02:16 PM
Nothing to do with "relative player talent" and everything to do with the different rules - NFL players would still go for third and long because they'd be expecting a fourth down.
Oh, come on... because the players in the NFL are so dumb that they can't adjust to playing a 3-down game instead of 4-downs?
Neither league or style has a lock on talent - yes, there are CFL players who couldn't make it in the NFL. There are also NFL players - and coaches, for that matter - who couldn't cut it in the CFL.
Your statement could be true. Problem is, to be more specific, the VAST MAJORITY of CFL players couldn't make it to the NFL. Also, I have no doubt that the VAST MAJORITY of NFL players would have absolutely no problem playing in the CFL.
And there are are those who excelled at both - Doug Flutie anyone?
There have been a few (and the keyword is FEW) players that played in the CFL and then moved on to the NFL and had real success. But the total number could probably be counted on one hand. But on the other hand, probably 90% or more NFL players would EASILY be successful in the CFL.
Let's not forget, the holder of SEVERAL major-league points records - football or otherwise - is a CFL player AND career Lion... perhaps you've heard of him, Lui Passaglia? You know, the original "Luuuuuuuuuuuuu!"
I would not be surprised if he could have had decent success playing in the NFL... but it's not like there aren't kickers in the NFL that aren't better than him. His longevity is commendable, but the title of holding several "major-league points records" is a little hollow.
Do you not think any of Tom Brady, Brett Favre, the Manning brothers, etc. would do well in the CFL? For that matter, if any one of them played their entire career in the CFL, what do you think their chances are that they would have many or most of the records? I think the chances are pretty high.
Bottom line is while there does exist some differences between the CFL and NFL games, the fundamentals are still similar enough, that I am fully confident that the vast majority of NFL players would have no problem with not just playing in the CFL, but excelling in the CFL. However, I am also equally confident that the vast majority of CFL players would simply not be able to compete at a satisfactory level in the NFL, nevermind excelling there.
InvisibleSoul
11-23-2009, 02:32 PM
I think you guys are making to much out of the comment, the Browns and the Det Lions are the armpit of the NFL. He was just saying even as armpit teams they'd still whoop the BC Lions playing with there rules which is true. I hate these debates, both games are great in there own way.
Exactly. I never made any claims that one game is a better product than the other. All I'm saying that terms of skill, there shouldn't even be a debate. NFL has the more skilled players by FAR, and consequently, their teams are much better, to the extent that even the worst NFL team should still be significantly better than any CFL team.
carisear
11-23-2009, 04:29 PM
I think you guys are making to much out of the comment, the Browns and the Det Lions are the armpit of the NFL. He was just saying even as armpit teams they'd still whoop the BC Lions playing with there rules which is true. I hate these debates, both games are great in there own way.
rofl yeah, it was just tongue and cheek that i made that comment. :P
and i personally believe cfl is a greater game, while nfl has better players, and infinitely better marketing. they are different games though so a 'good' player just won't automatically be good in both leagues.
anyways, if it was montreal vs calgary, i would've bet on calgary. But because it's the riders, montreal will win. not by 38, but by 10+.
asahai69
11-23-2009, 05:11 PM
theyre 2 different types of games. its like comparing the nfl to rugby. looks similar but its really not. who compares the patriots against the all blacks. like honestly. its a retarded argument. nfl isnt a better game by any means. ricky williams came up here with the argos. he never did anything here. lol
ek.powa
11-24-2009, 11:58 AM
man the lions are doing pretty mell!!!!!!!!!!!
mgarba
11-24-2009, 12:49 PM
You are being a pure nuthugger if you are denying the fact that the NFL does not have better atheletes than the CFL.
Give me a friggin break, the talent pool the NFL has to pull from far outweighs the CFL. Those same NFL players if they were brought into the CFL game would do far better than the current players we have in the league.
Soundy
11-24-2009, 12:56 PM
You are being a pure nuthugger if you are denying the fact that the NFL does not have better atheletes than the CFL.
Nobody's denying that :)
Give me a friggin break, the talent pool the NFL has to pull from far outweighs the CFL. Those same NFL players if they were brought into the CFL game would do far better than the current players we have in the league.
Yes, Ricky Williams is proof of that :haha:
carisear
11-24-2009, 02:25 PM
If only they played/taught CFL rules football in schools in the US, *THEN* you'd see some good football :)
Soundy
11-24-2009, 03:41 PM
Most Canadian schools teach four-down ball, although some of the other rules are unique to school sports.
winson604
11-29-2009, 04:11 PM
So anybody watching the grey cup? LOL fucking AC chocking again so far but I'm not surprised.
So anybody watching the grey cup? LOL fucking AC chocking again so far but I'm not surprised.
Lions aren't in it, no watchy.............
Gh0stRider
11-29-2009, 06:02 PM
riders got pwnd!
quasi
11-29-2009, 06:04 PM
Wow, they choked it away what can I say. I guess the betters won, they killed the spread.
So sad.............. I'd hate to be the guy who screwed up. When I saw the ball go wide, I thought it was over until all those flags went flying.
I was hoping for a green day.
winson604
11-29-2009, 06:57 PM
^^
haha yea horrible mistake!! Somebodies going to get beat down tonight.
Soundy
11-29-2009, 07:39 PM
Q: How many Roughriders does it take to win the Grey Cup?
A: Minus one.
I'm kind of glad Montreal won the Grey Cup.
If they had lost, they would have left the CFL and started their own league.
Bob Sagget! ........ Frenchies.
j/k
2009 season is over, but perhaps a mod will change this to just "BC Lions thread".
Anyway, I think I'll go see a couple of games at the temporary site. Perhaps get tickets to the cheap seats just for the hell of it.
I'm kind of excited about the outdoor venue. Anyone else planning on taking in some games this upcoming season? I don't even know what kind of team we are going to have this season.
sonick
06-11-2010, 07:22 AM
I am hoping to go with some friends, just for the atmosphere of an outdoor football game.
I wanna catch either Montreal or Calgary, but both of their games that I am free for are Friday nights, which is a bit of a rush going down after work.
Soundy
06-11-2010, 07:25 AM
2009 season is over, but perhaps a mod will change this to just "BC Lions thread".
Why don't you just start a "BC Lions 2010" thread?
Eff-1
06-11-2010, 08:57 PM
feel free to start a new thread.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.