| 
 
   | Advanced Forced Induction & N/A Engine Tuning This forum is brought to you by Racing Greed in Port Coquitlam. Supercharger vs Turbocharger vs NA?  Hondata vs Megasquirt?  94oct vs 87oct?  Through technical discussion, let's find out what will the best option for you...
 
  |  
   |  |  |       |  03-07-2010, 05:20 PM | #1 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   |  How bad is 3in exhaust on n/a engine ?  
 
			
			Stock 240sx with ka24de, i wanna get a catback, almost all the catbacks are 3in, How bad you think the torque loss with be ? I was thinking it woulnt be so bad considering that its stock headers and stock cat, there is probably enough back pressure from those.. Any thoughts or experience specifically with a 240..
 Thanks
 |   |   |   |      |  03-07-2010, 05:53 PM | #2 |   | It's like going crazy when you're already nuts 
				  Join Date: Aug 2005 
					Posts: 6,012
				 
		
			
				Thanked 3,284 Times in 851 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 90 Times in 38 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			I went from a 3" to a 2.5" on my old car with a KA and didn't notice much of any difference other than a loss of torque in the upper range
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-07-2010, 07:46 PM | #3 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			allright im gunna go 3in. do you know if a 3in catback bolts up to the stock cat ?
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-07-2010, 10:05 PM | #4 |   | Head Moderator 
				  Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor 
					Posts: 22,661
				 
		
			
				Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			Just curious... For what reason(s) are you using for going with a 3" cat-back?
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-08-2010, 09:24 AM | #5 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			Its what is widely available. Most are 3in since lots of people run sr20 or ca18 enginesPosted via RS Mobile |   |   |   |      |  03-08-2010, 10:38 AM | #6 |   | 2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung 
				  Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: N49.2 W122.1 
					Posts: 6,176
				 
		
			
				Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			Have you done any calculations or modeling? I think it will do more good for your application (not to mention more immediate) than asking.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-08-2010, 02:09 PM | #7 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			Modeling ? Calculations ?? No. I dont know formulas for airflow based on pipe size. But thanks for that....Posted via RS Mobile |   |   |   |      |  03-09-2010, 04:19 PM | #8 |   | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum 
				  Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: richmond 
					Posts: 2,837
				 
		
			
				Thanked 1,490 Times in 570 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 172 Times in 64 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			you will get all the needed back pressure from the manifold down pipe and stock cat.
		 
				__________________Rise Auto Salon
 
 11938 95a Ave Delta
 I can be reached VIA text @ 778-232-1465
 
 Oil change special $70 5 liters synthetic oil including OEM filter Fender rolling from $45 per fender
 Car Audio:
 Focal, Morel, Genesis, Clarion, Scosche, Escort, Compustar, GReddy, Blitz, Tomei, Motul, Endless, Defi, Cusco, Nismo + More
 
 
 We specialize in:
 Custom Car Audio
 Race/4x4 Fabrication
 Forced Induction
 Engine Swaps
 General Maintenance
 |   |   |   |      |  03-09-2010, 06:11 PM | #9 |   | I don't get it 
				  Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Burnaby, BC 
					Posts: 437
				 
		
			
				Thanked 95 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			2.5 is more than enough for an NA imo.
		 
				__________________.
 |   |   |   |      |  03-09-2010, 08:09 PM | #10 |   | RS.net Licensed Sponsor 
				  Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 2,808
				 
		
			
				Thanked 155 Times in 137 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by bikerman  Stock 240sx with ka24de, i wanna get a catback, almost all the catbacks are 3in, How bad you think the torque loss with be ? I was thinking it woulnt be so bad considering that its stock headers and stock cat, there is probably enough back pressure from those.. Any thoughts or experience specifically with a 240..
 Thanks
 |  I would suggest that you have an exhaust built for you. Use our muffler and tip and have our suggested exhaust shop make a 2.5" exhaust for you. It will make you very happy.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-09-2010, 08:38 PM | #11 |   | Head Moderator 
				  Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor 
					Posts: 22,661
				 
		
			
				Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by bikerman  Its what is widely available. Most are 3in since lots of people run sr20 or ca18 enginesPosted via RS Mobile |  Just because a size is widely available or popular, it doesn't mean it's ideal.  I had full 2.75" piping on my old CA18DETT (yes twin turbo).  My suggestion would be a 2.25 or 2.5, max.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-10-2010, 02:00 PM | #12 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Lomac  Just because a size is widely available or popular, it doesn't mean it's ideal.  I had full 2.75" piping on my old CA18DETT (yes twin turbo).  My suggestion would be a 2.25 or 2.5, max. |  I Know its not ideal but i can pick one up cheap.. I might just fork out the money and get a 2.5..  
Thanks for the input.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-11-2010, 11:42 AM | #13 |   | Banned (BBM) 
				  Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 16,142
				 
		
			
				Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			2.25 to 2.5 for N/A
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-11-2010, 03:20 PM | #14 |   | RS.net Licensed Vendor 
				  Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: vancouver BC 
					Posts: 230
				 
		
			
				Thanked 107 Times in 25 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 13 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	   | 
			
			The 3" catback won't really make a difference because the stock manifold and cat will be the restriction anyway.  The one thing that might cause problems (depending on the catback you use) is where the 3" catback meets the stock cat.  Sometimes they don't seal up nicely and you can get an exhaust leak.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-11-2010, 03:49 PM | #15 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by RacingGreed  The 3" catback won't really make a difference because the stock manifold and cat will be the restriction anyway.  The one thing that might cause problems (depending on the catback you use) is where the 3" catback meets the stock cat.  Sometimes they don't seal up nicely and you can get an exhaust leak. |  Yeah, that's my main concern is getting one that will mate with my stock cat with out problems. Although, the flange is huge on the stock exhaust.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-12-2010, 09:23 AM | #16 |   | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum 
				  Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: vancouver 
					Posts: 2,637
				 
		
			
				Thanked 154 Times in 91 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 26 Times in 9 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			LOTS of misinformation here about max 2.5" or whatever.There have been many dynos on a 4cyl engine making more power with a 3" exhaust.  Bigger 4cyl like 2.2L and up, not civics.  I run a 3" exhaust myself on my prelude and I had a 2.25, 2.5 and then I finally ended up with a 3".  You would probably not benefit as much because of your stock header and exhaust so you should change those too if you want more power.  Tuning will be everything though.
 |   |   |   |      |  03-12-2010, 10:55 AM | #17 |   | Head Moderator 
				  Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor 
					Posts: 22,661
				 
		
			
				Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by TheSalesman  LOTS of misinformation here about max 2.5" or whatever.There have been many dynos on a 4cyl engine making more power with a 3" exhaust.  Bigger 4cyl like 2.2L and up, not civics.  I run a 3" exhaust myself on my prelude and I had a 2.25, 2.5 and then I finally ended up with a 3".  You would probably not benefit as much because of your stock header and exhaust so you should change those too if you want more power.  Tuning will be everything though.
 |  I wouldn't say that it's misinformation.  By my suggestion of 2.5" max, I'm trying to give him the best of both worlds.  Smaller = better low end torque, Bigger = higher top end.  By going for something in the middle, you sacrifice a little on each end, but retain most of the rest.  Yes, the stock headers and cat will help with torque, but if he decides to upgrade them at some point, he'll be back at square one if he wants to go for more lower end torque.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-12-2010, 02:23 PM | #18 |   | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum 
				  Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: vancouver 
					Posts: 2,637
				 
		
			
				Thanked 154 Times in 91 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 26 Times in 9 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by Lomac  I wouldn't say that it's misinformation.  By my suggestion of 2.5" max, I'm trying to give him the best of both worlds.  Smaller = better low end torque, Bigger = higher top end.  By going for something in the middle, you sacrifice a little on each end, but retain most of the rest.  Yes, the stock headers and cat will help with torque, but if he decides to upgrade them at some point, he'll be back at square one if he wants to go for more lower end torque. |  This theory of smaller exhaust = more torque has been thrown out the window for a few years now.  Yeah I know it makes sense but its been dyno proven already that a 3" exhaust makes power through the entire power band.  This was done on a bone stock h22.  There are a lot of preludes out there running 3" exhausts now and I know this isnt an h22 but it is a 2.4L motor.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-12-2010, 04:52 PM | #19 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			yeah, the stock headers are pretty good too, comes stock with a decent size 4-2-1 header.. I think im gonna go 3", there is just way more of them on ebay    |   |   |   |      |  03-12-2010, 08:25 PM | #20 |   | Head Moderator 
				  Join Date: Dec 1982 Location: Great White Nor 
					Posts: 22,661
				 
		
			
				Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
			
		
	   |   Quote:   | 
					Originally Posted by TheSalesman  This theory of smaller exhaust = more torque has been thrown out the window for a few years now.  Yeah I know it makes sense but its been dyno proven already that a 3" exhaust makes power through the entire power band.  This was done on a bone stock h22.  There are a lot of preludes out there running 3" exhausts now and I know this isnt an h22 but it is a 2.4L motor. |  Lots of guys running N/A KA24's on Zilvia.net have gone from a 3" to a 2.5" because the added backpressure of the larger piping decreases  their max WHP.  Also dyno proven.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-12-2010, 09:32 PM | #21 |   | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum 
				  Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: vancouver 
					Posts: 2,637
				 
		
			
				Thanked 154 Times in 91 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 26 Times in 9 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			well here are a few threads just for you to read up on.  3" exhaust makes power over a 2.5" even on an NA k20.http://www.honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2341715 http://www.honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2197695 
I know where you are coming from and a lot of people don't believe it.  It is really up to you.  I speak from experience and not just listen to what all the people say.  My friend also runs a 3" exhaust on his pretty much bone stock ka24 and although its not very fast, its fast for what it is.  Another reason the people that have shown dynos of just bolting on a 3" exhaust and losing power is 99% because thats what it was....bolt on.  You need to tune it to the same AFR as it was doing with the 2.5" exhaust too.   
I also run a 3" exhaust on my prelude....can't say it doesn't work.  It ran 12's...NA 
It also made more power on the dyno although I can't find the dyno right now.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-12-2010, 11:44 PM | #22 |   | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum 
				  Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: vancouver 
					Posts: 2,637
				 
		
			
				Thanked 154 Times in 91 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 26 Times in 9 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			I also went as far as looking on a 240 site to read up about 3" exhaust on NA KA24.http://www.240sxforums.com/forums/ka...ade-guide.html 
Seems to me like....nothing but gains.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-13-2010, 09:07 PM | #23 |   | It's like going crazy when you're already nuts 
				  Join Date: Aug 2005 
					Posts: 6,012
				 
		
			
				Thanked 3,284 Times in 851 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 90 Times in 38 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			A lot of people just go straight to 3" despite any losses in the lower range because they're likely either going to go KA-T, SR, or RB.
		 |   |   |   |      |  03-18-2010, 03:33 PM | #24 |   | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday 
				  Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver 
					Posts: 6,044
				 
		
			
				Thanked 315 Times in 149 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 53 Times in 33 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			run a 3" 
 it'll be fine. and loud. but fine.
 
				__________________1996 Honda Accord  1995 Nissan 240sx  2004 Infiniti G35  2005 Honda Jazz   BuySell Feedback  Quote:   | "It's called Sex Panther by Odeon. It's illegal in nine countries... Yep, it's made with bits of real panther, so you know it's good ... They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time. " |  |   |   |   |     |  03-22-2010, 07:43 PM | #25 |   | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS! 
				  Join Date: Feb 2007 
					Posts: 183
				 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
		
			
				Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	   | 
			
			i did go 3inch, picking it up tomorrow.
		 |   |   |   |    |  |  |  
 
   |    |  Posting Rules |   |  You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
 All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 PM. 
 |