View Single Post
Old 06-18-2010, 12:41 AM   #5
Senna4ever
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by keitaro View Post
How is CF in terms of durability? I know in terms of Aerospace, CF is used extensively now. CF parts in aerospace are monitored closely for signs of internal failure, through constant non-destructive testing. IIRC its usually the core that gets damage though.

The reason I ask is, that CF tripods are expensive. If they get damaged easily and break, I would like to at least add some protection to make them last longer (hopefully forever).
It's quite durable. I treat my Manfrotto 055CXPRO3 like shit, and it's still going strong. I've got scratches and dings everwhere from dropping it, as I will often have the legs folded in monopod mode, and I'm too lazy to spread the legs after taking off the camera so I just let it tip over onto the ground. My Manfrotto 468MGRC2 head just broke from too many impacts, but I just have to buy a cheap part to fix it. With Manfrotto, you can always buy replacement parts, unlike some of the lower end brand names. I think Manfrotto guarantees replacement parts up to 10 years after a certain model is discontinued.

Aerospace parts go through way more stress than a CF tripod ever will.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote