REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > The Business and Financial Forum

The Business and Financial Forum THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
Revscene Wall Street.
Consolidating debt? Good business tips? Buying stock? How's our economy doing? Discuss and share advice and tools on everyday banking, investing, wealth management and insurance.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-30-2011, 07:47 AM   #4376
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,665
Thanked 760 Times in 383 Posts
Failed 150 Times in 49 Posts
ya that makes sense...

and what does this mean??

Due to market volatility, the margin rate on common shares of Copper Fox Metals Inc. (CUU.VN)is increasing to 75% effective immediately. Please review your currentpositions to ensure your account does not enter a margin deficiency dueto this change.
Advertisement
blkgsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 07:49 AM   #4377
Need my Daily Fix of RS
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 270
Thanked 39 Times in 10 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by blkgsr View Post
ya that makes sense...

and what does this mean??

Due to market volatility, the margin rate on common shares of Copper Fox Metals Inc. (CUU.VN)is increasing to 75% effective immediately. Please review your currentpositions to ensure your account does not enter a margin deficiency dueto this change.
Have you bought your CUU shares on margin?
DOHCVTEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 08:47 AM   #4378
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,489
Thanked 1,458 Times in 588 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 9 Posts
CUU price is down due to margin calling, hopefully it's like last week, day before the Aerial PR came out the price hit a lot of 1.83
shawnly1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 08:56 AM   #4379
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 1,123 Times in 533 Posts
Failed 71 Times in 38 Posts
^I think so too. Especially how it drops to 2.03 this morning. Honestly, the stock is held mostly by insiders plus a bunch of longs, CUU doesn't move as much as the other junior stocks out there.
highfive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 10:34 AM   #4380
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
strykn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,550
Thanked 4,012 Times in 988 Posts
Failed 210 Times in 55 Posts
lol retails don't move CUU
strykn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 10:36 AM   #4381
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,665
Thanked 760 Times in 383 Posts
Failed 150 Times in 49 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOHCVTEC View Post
Have you bought your CUU shares on margin?
no cash
blkgsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 11:06 AM   #4382
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,489
Thanked 1,458 Times in 588 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 9 Posts
Strykn, our crystal ball/spidey senses still saying Tuesday?

New broker appearing on level II as well, Fraser Mackenzie, scooping up shares
shawnly1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 11:41 AM   #4383
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
strykn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,550
Thanked 4,012 Times in 988 Posts
Failed 210 Times in 55 Posts
yup, still have a feeling its gonna be Tuesday, if its not tuesday I will have to reduce my position a bit
strykn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 02:07 PM   #4384
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
TRE went up 20% today.. lol.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 07:49 PM   #4385
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
Doubl3_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cnd
Posts: 3,077
Thanked 299 Times in 72 Posts
Failed 8 Times in 8 Posts
anyone here bought ATH???
__________________
,___,
[O.o]....O'Rly?
/)__)
-"--"-
Doubl3_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 10:08 PM   #4386
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOHCVTEC View Post
I think the overall market is irrational and could snap down at any moment. Although the Greek parliament passed their vote today, which the markets were expecting anyway, the underlying problems with Greece, and indeed with the PIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Greece, Spain), are still present, if not getting worst. The only country holding the Euro zone together is Germany, with the UK a very distant second. So when (not if) the next PIGS see fiscal problems, the markets will fall again. It could happen in weeks, not months.
Anytime the TSX index goes over $13,500 I sell some of my positions and do some profit taking. I just don't see a sustained rally with what's happening with PIIGS (extra I for Italy since they have a problem collecting taxes like Greece), china, the US.

Until we see the news get better with some of these situations. I'd agree and hold a lot of liquid positions. But if we see a pull back to under 13,000 for the TSX I'd start buying again.
iEatClams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 10:24 PM   #4387
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by azndude69 View Post
Anytime the TSX index goes over $13,500 I sell some of my positions and do some profit taking. I just don't see a sustained rally with what's happening with PIIGS (extra I for Italy since they have a problem collecting taxes like Greece), china, the US.

Until we see the news get better with some of these situations. I'd agree and hold a lot of liquid positions. But if we see a pull back to under 13,000 for the TSX I'd start buying again.
so you'll buy on the basis of a 3.x% pull back (the difference between 13,500 and 13,000?) seems rather arbitrary

there will always be some worries, but i'm still very bullish for the overall economic picture - maybe because i'm an investor, not a trader, but corporate earnings are strong (worldwide economy, not US), and i invest on dips for the best of breeds that will be best of breeds for the next 5 years - having said that, yes there are things that concern me, and I monitor these things closely, if htey worry me way too much, i will get out of the market... but a general index level shouldn't dictate investments in individual stocks

I know, for a fact, that I can't time the market - did any of you time the Japan earthquake crisis (the answer is no, if you 'did' you were lucky that you exited when you did as you cannot see into the future of natural disasters)

maybe it won't make me a millionaire overnight, but i don't think that should be anyone's intention
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 11:12 PM   #4388
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 1,123 Times in 533 Posts
Failed 71 Times in 38 Posts
^ I agree. Especially right now when US companies are holding so much cash. Sooner or later, they will deploy that money back into the economy through investments. By that time, US banks should begin to normalize, the overall market should benefit even further.
highfive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2011, 08:25 AM   #4389
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by highfive View Post
^ I agree. Especially right now when US companies are holding so much cash. Sooner or later, they will deploy that money back into the economy through investments. By that time, US banks should begin to normalize, the overall market should benefit even further.
well, yes and no - you're right, these companies have so much money overseas... and they use this money overseas (its not like they're just sitting on it getting a 1.25% return in a GIC/T-bill) - but what we need is to have these funds redeployed at home, in the good old US of A.

My personal feelings are that the next step of the economic recovery, and what is needed to push start the US recovery is to have the 35% tax on these funds decreased - there is talk of a 5.xx% tax for a short while in relief of this, i would back this until the cows come home - this will be nothing but positive for job creation, US stability, etc.

everyone wants, an will be better off with this money back home - so while there is a potential for 35% tax on these funds (which will never happen, as these companies will never repatriate at 35%, and given these companies will last forever, effectively - that 35% becomes 0% in reality) or 5.xx% today - that'll still be trillions of dollars of tax revenues for the fed, and millions of jobs created at home, invested in what we're good at - innovation, technological advancements (maybe in the world of natural gas, and other 'home grown' energy sources, housing price stability, increased demand, etc, etc.)

President Obama needs to call me to talk about this!
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2011, 10:54 AM   #4390
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4444 View Post
so you'll buy on the basis of a 3.x% pull back (the difference between 13,500 and 13,000?) seems rather arbitrary

there will always be some worries, but i'm still very bullish for the overall economic picture - maybe because i'm an investor, not a trader, but corporate earnings are strong (worldwide economy, not US), and i invest on dips for the best of breeds that will be best of breeds for the next 5 years - having said that, yes there are things that concern me, and I monitor these things closely, if htey worry me way too much, i will get out of the market... but a general index level shouldn't dictate investments in individual stocks

I know, for a fact, that I can't time the market - did any of you time the Japan earthquake crisis (the answer is no, if you 'did' you were lucky that you exited when you did as you cannot see into the future of natural disasters)

maybe it won't make me a millionaire overnight, but i don't think that should be anyone's intention
That's what my short term strategy will be. Just like stocks, I think Indexes, S&P and TSX have entry and exit points and most stocks correlate with the general markets. I think most of it is timing and guess work but that's how the world works for me. Sometimes your right, sometimes your not, but hopefully your right more than wrong.

A lot of advisors will tell you it's never about timing or security selection but I believe it is. When to enter, when to take your profits, when to hold cash, when to sell when somethings overvalued, buy when undervalued; it's all timing imho.


I'm not as bullish as most economists and investors. I have holdings that I'll probably have for the next 2 years and I have holdings that I "trade" on a daily (few days), weekly or even monthly basis or so.
iEatClams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2011, 11:23 AM   #4391
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4444 View Post
well, yes and no - you're right, these companies have so much money overseas... and they use this money overseas (its not like they're just sitting on it getting a 1.25% return in a GIC/T-bill) - but what we need is to have these funds redeployed at home, in the good old US of A.

My personal feelings are that the next step of the economic recovery, and what is needed to push start the US recovery is to have the 35% tax on these funds decreased - there is talk of a 5.xx% tax for a short while in relief of this, i would back this until the cows come home - this will be nothing but positive for job creation, US stability, etc.

everyone wants, an will be better off with this money back home - so while there is a potential for 35% tax on these funds (which will never happen, as these companies will never repatriate at 35%, and given these companies will last forever, effectively - that 35% becomes 0% in reality) or 5.xx% today - that'll still be trillions of dollars of tax revenues for the fed, and millions of jobs created at home, invested in what we're good at - innovation, technological advancements (maybe in the world of natural gas, and other 'home grown' energy sources, housing price stability, increased demand, etc, etc.)

President Obama needs to call me to talk about this!
I would disagree with you here.

I'm an opponent on further tax cuts for corporations cause it just doesn't seem to work for me. While it might provide short term stocks to increase because the financial statements will look better, it will hurt the overall economy in the long run.

Since the 70's tax cuts the US has never been the same. In the middle of the last century corporate and income taxes for the rich were at super high levels. Then the government decreased it further and further until now they are now at extremely low levels compared to that period of time.

I won't go into a lengthy discussion but to summarize why I don't think it won't work:

- Tax cuts don't trickle down. Tax rates for the rich and large corporation has been decreasing and decreasing since as long as you and I have been born. It hasn't trickled down.
- The Bush administration had tax cuts in the early 2000s that were worth almost $3 Trillion dollars, that could have been used on infrastructure, education, innovation. anything. $3 Trillion is a lot of money.
- Tax cuts seems to help only the rich, and since these cuts, the gap between the rich and the poor has been increasing. The richest 20% of population owns 85% of the wealth. I'm no socialist, but even that's grossly out of line. The middle class, one of the driving engines of the economy, is getting poorer.
- Jobs have not been created from these tax cuts and actually, most of the savings on the bottom line from corporations are used to invest Overseas instead of in North America.
iEatClams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2011, 01:31 PM   #4392
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by azndude69 View Post
I would disagree with you here.

I'm an opponent on further tax cuts for corporations cause it just doesn't seem to work for me. While it might provide short term stocks to increase because the financial statements will look better, it will hurt the overall economy in the long run.

Since the 70's tax cuts the US has never been the same. In the middle of the last century corporate and income taxes for the rich were at super high levels. Then the government decreased it further and further until now they are now at extremely low levels compared to that period of time.

I won't go into a lengthy discussion but to summarize why I don't think it won't work:

- Tax cuts don't trickle down. Tax rates for the rich and large corporation has been decreasing and decreasing since as long as you and I have been born. It hasn't trickled down.
- The Bush administration had tax cuts in the early 2000s that were worth almost $3 Trillion dollars, that could have been used on infrastructure, education, innovation. anything. $3 Trillion is a lot of money.
- Tax cuts seems to help only the rich, and since these cuts, the gap between the rich and the poor has been increasing. The richest 20% of population owns 85% of the wealth. I'm no socialist, but even that's grossly out of line. The middle class, one of the driving engines of the economy, is getting poorer.
- Jobs have not been created from these tax cuts and actually, most of the savings on the bottom line from corporations are used to invest Overseas instead of in North America.
I don't think you read what I wrote properly

I'm not calling for corporate tax cuts on income, I'm calling for a one time 'allowance' to repatriate foreign funds into the US at lower tax rates

Where this comes from is US corporations having income offshore that never get taxed in the US, with the idea being that they will be taxed to the fullest extent (35%) when repatriated (funds brought back into the US) - but why would a company lose 35% of their offshore funds, when they can continue to reinvest outside of the US - I call for a one time grace period (6 months? 1 year) for large corps to repatriate their funds, the government will earn 5.xx% on the repatriated funds vs. effectively 0% as the corporations may NEVER repatriate these funds.

this is not a corporate income tax decrease, this is an opportunity to get something rather than nothing AND to have that money working hard in America for Americans - which I think, as hte most efficient work force (with respect to innovation) is the best use for htis money - this increase in output will create jobs & future corporate & personal income taxes at the full rates

win-win... but politics WILL get in the way of this
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2011, 06:57 PM   #4393
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4444 View Post
I don't think you read what I wrote properly

I'm not calling for corporate tax cuts on income, I'm calling for a one time 'allowance' to repatriate foreign funds into the US at lower tax rates

Where this comes from is US corporations having income offshore that never get taxed in the US, with the idea being that they will be taxed to the fullest extent (35%) when repatriated (funds brought back into the US) - but why would a company lose 35% of their offshore funds, when they can continue to reinvest outside of the US - I call for a one time grace period (6 months? 1 year) for large corps to repatriate their funds, the government will earn 5.xx% on the repatriated funds vs. effectively 0% as the corporations may NEVER repatriate these funds.

this is not a corporate income tax decrease, this is an opportunity to get something rather than nothing AND to have that money working hard in America for Americans - which I think, as hte most efficient work force (with respect to innovation) is the best use for htis money - this increase in output will create jobs & future corporate & personal income taxes at the full rates

win-win... but politics WILL get in the way of this
Sorry, complete my bad for missing that.

I kinda like this idea, however my only worry is there's nothing guaranteeing that these companies will invest all the cash that they've brought back from being hoarded overseas.

There needs to be some sort of employment or incentive that requires them to invest X dollars or hire X amount of employees otherwise the full tax rate would apply instead of the 5% that you mentioned.

I have a feeling that they would just issue dividends to with all this cash instead of doing any hiring or research/development or anything like that.
iEatClams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2011, 07:01 PM   #4394
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by azndude69 View Post
Sorry, complete my bad for missing that.

I kinda like this idea, however my only worry is there's nothing guaranteeing that these companies will invest all the cash that they've brought back from being hoarded overseas.

There needs to be some sort of employment or incentive that requires them to invest X dollars or hire X amount of employees otherwise the full tax rate would apply instead of the 5% that you mentioned.

I have a feeling that they would just issue dividends to with all this cash instead of doing any hiring or research/development or anything like that.
dividends would be awesome - it would create additional wealth in the hands of americans who will spend or invest that money, aka the money will be in the US system, creating higher top lines for most companies
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 10:27 AM   #4395
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
strykn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,550
Thanked 4,012 Times in 988 Posts
Failed 210 Times in 55 Posts
forgot Canadian markets open today. CUU close of 2.20 would be excellent heading into tomorrow
strykn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 11:14 AM   #4396
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,489
Thanked 1,458 Times in 588 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 9 Posts
Cautiously optimistic, it's currently at 2.16/2.17. Glad the margin calling didn't affect the share price that much
shawnly1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 12:08 PM   #4397
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
strykn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,550
Thanked 4,012 Times in 988 Posts
Failed 210 Times in 55 Posts
I'll take 2.16
strykn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 12:42 PM   #4398
NEWBIE ACCOUNT!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 22
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 13 Times in 1 Post
why is tre like this .. 28% increase today
estcecest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 12:47 PM   #4399
Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
 
classified's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 321
Thanked 158 Times in 33 Posts
Failed 53 Times in 19 Posts
god dammit i woke up at 1 and didnt get a chance to sell my shares at like 4.90 god dammit
classified is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 01:10 PM   #4400
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 604
Posts: 1,095
Thanked 508 Times in 91 Posts
Failed 78 Times in 28 Posts
Holy crap TRE lol...spiked up to $4.99 today
Posted via RS Mobile
crazyazn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net