Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  | |
09-01-2009, 10:35 AM
|
#1 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
| You can love it or hate it but the HST is good public policy
Leading economists from across the country say the Harmonized Sales Tax is the single most important step British Columbia can take to boost its economy.
Studies have shown that it's already working in the eastern provinces.
article from the vancouver sun: Quote:
You can love it or hate it but the HST is good public policy
Vancouver SunSeptember 1, 2009
Personal income tax is the single largest source of provincial government revenue.
Individual taxpayers contributed $6.2 billion in the last budget, representing about one-third of total taxation revenue, giving Victoria the financial wherewithal to spend $15 billion on health and $10 billion on education.
Statistics Canada says the top 10 per cent of income earners pay 52 per cent of all taxes.
Half the population in B.C. pays no income tax at all.
It is obvious from these facts that taxes paid by high-income individuals are crucial to the standard of living of British Columbians.
It should also be clear, even though it has been missing from the debate, that the harmonized sales tax is intended to ensure that B.C. is able to maintain and create employment that pays people well.
The average annual wage in B.C.'s mining industry is $112,000, an income that attracts the highest marginal provincial tax rate (and second-highest federal rate).
Highly paid work is equally found in forestry, manufacturing and oil and gas.
It's no accident that these industries are singled out to benefit from the introduction of the HST.
Collectively, they will save approximately $1.9 billion with the removal of provincial sales tax from business inputs.
The PST is an embedded cost to producers and that makes them uncompetitive not only in export markets but here at home, where they battle for market share against foreign rivals who have not been burdened by similar taxes.
In other words, by retaining the antiquated provincial sales tax, we disadvantage local companies at home and abroad.
Moreover, the evidence from the Atlantic provinces, where the harmonized tax was introduced in 1997, suggests the tax shift raises capital investment, which in turn boosts productivity.
B.C. lags the rest of Canada in this important measure of the efficiency of production.
Many analysts agree that future economic momentum will come increasingly from productivity gains rather than employment growth. The B.C. government claims the HST is equivalent to a 40-per-cent tax cut on business investment, which should propel productivity improvement going forward.
Baldly stated, more competitive businesses create high-paying jobs and generate tax revenues needed for essential services like health care and education.
There is plenty to criticize in the manner and method Gordon Campbell's Liberal government chose to introduce such a dramatic change in direction; that is, by decree issued unexpectedly in the first year of a new term with the legislature in recess.
Regardless of any political missteps, however, the HST is sound public policy.
It is pointless to try to conceal the fact that some goods and services that were exempt from provincial sales tax will now be subject to the harmonized tax, making them more expensive for consumers.
But economics is all about trade-offs. Without the $1.6-billion transition payment from the federal government, the reduction in administrative costs for government and business and the incentive to maintain highly-paid employment, it is more than likely personal income taxes would have to go up.
Perhaps an income tax cut might have made the HST a little more palatable at the outset, allowing it to be characterized as revenue neutral, like the carbon tax.
In any case, the burden on consumers may not be as significant as it's made out to be.
For example, homebuilders are particularly concerned about HST because they estimate it will increase the cost of a $600,000 home by $42,000, or $22,000 after the maximum $20,000-rebate the government has proposed.
However, the cost of construction should be substantially lower because the HST on building materials will be eliminated by an input credit.
Presumably, some builders will pass on these savings.
Resale homes are unaffected by the HST, although fees for legal and related services would attract the tax.
Given the high cost of housing and the added "closing costs" associated with a real estate sales, Victoria could soften the blow by increasing the threshold at which the HST kicks in and/or reducing the Property Transfer Tax.
The restaurant industry is also upset that the HST will apply to restaurant meals, which have been exempt from PST, a tax that restaurants in most other jurisdictions have paid for many years.
Unfortunately, there is no public policy goal to be realized by continuing to exempt this industry.
Money not spent on restaurant meals will be diverted to other uses. There's no negative macro-economic hit if the restaurant industry contracts, as one analyst bluntly put it.
Here again, the government could ease the pain by reducing payroll taxes like Workers Compensation premiums and urging the federal government to reduce Employment Insurance premiums.
B.C. needs coffee shops, restaurants and condo developments.
But we also need to produce goods and services such as base metals, lumber and high-tech gadgets the rest of the world wants to buy at competitive prices.
The best thing the government can do to induce that outcome is to tax consumption rather than production and investment.
And that's what the HST does.
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun | |
| |
09-01-2009, 10:58 AM
|
#2 | Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 310
Thanked 56 Times in 23 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 18 Posts
|
This article couldn't be more wrong.
The single most important thing that would boost the economy is legalizing and taxing the sale of Marijuana.
The HST is going to cripple the restaurant industry.
Places where they automatically slap on an 18% service fee, will now add the 12% HST. You're going to be paying 30% tax for your restaurant food.
Good luck with that.
|
| |
09-01-2009, 11:06 AM
|
#3 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 2,039
Thanked 101 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 44 Times in 20 Posts
|
HST, GST, PST
who give a shit anymore, its not like we can change the law
peace out !
|
| |
09-01-2009, 03:19 PM
|
#4 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,906
Thanked 438 Times in 240 Posts
Failed 20 Times in 15 Posts
|
Bullshit, high-income individuals pay little to no tax. Why else would you hear about all those rich folk getting in shit for not paying their taxes?
|
| |
09-01-2009, 03:25 PM
|
#5 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,760
Thanked 375 Times in 181 Posts
Failed 159 Times in 63 Posts
|
Things to do
1) Buy a car before Jul 1 next year.
2) Make reservations for no more than 7 ppl in restaurants. If more, reserve 2 tables.
__________________
Ignorance is bliss
How I wish I can remain ignorant, why do I know so much?
|
| |
09-01-2009, 06:20 PM
|
#6 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: .
Posts: 1,042
Thanked 1,051 Times in 265 Posts
Failed 120 Times in 37 Posts
|
What the article is saying, and the government is hoping, is that businesses and restaurants will have lower operating costs due to harmonizing of the two taxes. They are hoping that these savings will be passed onto the consumers. So even though you are paying an extra 6% for your food, the food should cost less. Quote:
Originally Posted by ynot-llat This article couldn't be more wrong.
The HST is going to cripple the restaurant industry.
Places where they automatically slap on an 18% service fee, will now add the 12% HST. You're going to be paying 30% tax for your restaurant food. | I hope you are being sarcastic. Quote:
Originally Posted by mickz Bullshit, high-income individuals pay little to no tax. Why else would you hear about all those rich folk getting in shit for not paying their taxes? | |
| |
09-01-2009, 06:41 PM
|
#7 | Ubereem Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,070
Thanked 120 Times in 63 Posts
Failed 24 Times in 10 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bananana What the article is saying, and the government is hoping, is that businesses and restaurants will have lower operating costs due to harmonizing of the two taxes. They are hoping that these savings will be passed onto the consumers. So even though you are paying an extra 6% for your food, the food should cost less.
I hope you are being sarcastic. |
restaurant won't reduce prices, if anything the prices will stay the same and increase. Find me a restaurant in town that has "reduced" all prices across the board instead of having "specials".
as for the Rich, it depends. how they are setup. self employed, salaried, company.
the rich CAN pay little or no taxes. i've seen T1 for 10k when he makes 2.5million annually.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Culture_Vulture sometimes I like to use kindergarten art class scissors to cut my pubes | |
| |
09-01-2009, 06:50 PM
|
#8 | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,296
Thanked 522 Times in 194 Posts
Failed 87 Times in 37 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bananana What the article is saying, and the government is hoping, is that businesses and restaurants will have lower operating costs due to harmonizing of the two taxes. They are hoping that these savings will be passed onto the consumers. So even though you are paying an extra 6% for your food, the food should cost less.
I hope you are being sarcastic. | a restaurant doesnt have to pay much GST or PST on the stuff they buy because its mostly raw food which dont require either.
|
| |
09-01-2009, 07:09 PM
|
#9 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 569
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
Originally Posted by mickz Bullshit, high-income individuals pay little to no tax. Why else would you hear about all those rich folk getting in shit for not paying their taxes? | Get a clue
|
| |
09-02-2009, 04:36 AM
|
#10 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,655
Thanked 443 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 34 Posts
|
Looking forward to the decrease in tax on alcohol
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane who would ban me? lol. Look at my post count. | |
| |
09-02-2009, 06:19 AM
|
#11 | Performance Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 18,119
Thanked 19,429 Times in 6,586 Posts
Failed 311 Times in 205 Posts
|
General rule of thumb to live by: if a politician tells you something is good for you, it's not.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 07:58 AM
|
#12 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ynot-llat The HST is going to cripple the restaurant industry. | No it won't.
BC has the highest restaurant menu prices of all provinces and people here still eat out a ton. I pay on average 20-30% more for meals here than Ontario.
Example: I typically get a "hungry man breakfast" which costs about $12 in most places I've eaten in Vancouver, plus coffee is extra ($3). The same breakfast was $10 with coffee included in Ottawa.
Do I refuse to go out cause I'm paying 50% more for breakfast? No. Eating out is a luxury and people will continue to pay even if prices go up 12%.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 08:04 AM
|
#13 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bananana What the article is saying, and the government is hoping, is that businesses and restaurants will have lower operating costs due to harmonizing of the two taxes. They are hoping that these savings will be passed onto the consumers. | Business won't pass on these costs, and I doubt that is the hope of the government.
This change puts more money into business's hands, which should allow them to hire more and expand their business since they won't pass this along to the consumer.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 08:13 AM
|
#14 | OWNER/C.F.O./MONEYMAN
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,486
Thanked 2,253 Times in 626 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
the HST is one thing, but its the approach the liberals specifically their leader gordon campbell took to impliment the HST.
it was sneaky, it was sly, it was typical gordon campbell liberal politics.
if there was discussion, explanation of the HST to the public before applying it or the suggestion of applying it, then it would have been easier to accept. but not this "drop the bomb" tactic.
Shit, the NDP are having a field day on this one... I dont like NDP either, i like the liberals just not their leader.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 08:54 AM
|
#15 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG the HST is one thing, but its the approach the liberals specifically their leader gordon campbell took to impliment the HST.
it was sneaky, it was sly, it was typical gordon campbell liberal politics.
if there was discussion, explanation of the HST to the public before applying it or the suggestion of applying it, then it would have been easier to accept. but not this "drop the bomb" tactic. | How would you "explain it to the public" without "dropping the bomb"?
What you really mean is "explain it to the public" and "let the public have an opportunity to say NO" and reject it. There is no opportunity to reject this, its a federal mandate, and either BC can take the cash bribe and run or wait till Ottawa mandates the change and get nothing.
Its not going into affect for a year, so its hardly "dropping the bomb". Peple just don't like change or taxes and want to bitch/whine/complain.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 09:28 AM
|
#16 | Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Surrey
Posts: 12,760
Thanked 689 Times in 376 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 38 Posts
|
saw the new last night, they're going to raise msp as well because of the "huge" deficit that they "couldn't" forsee.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 09:36 AM
|
#17 | OWNER/C.F.O./MONEYMAN
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,486
Thanked 2,253 Times in 626 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
"dropping the bomb" also means you dont have a choice, here you go!
campbell also campaigned, mind you it was in spring, not last year, not the year before, but months ago, no changes to tax. the way gov't works, decisions on something such as HST arent made within days. Also opposition party, let alone the rest of the house didnt even know of the HST.
I wont even begin to mention the budget being so far off. come on, if u build a house, and you do go over budget, its lets say, worse case scenario, 50% over budget, its within reason. but the gov'ts "estimation" was so far off, 5 times if not more than what was estimated. sure our economy took a dump this year, but come on, grade 10 business ed taught us how to better balance our books than how the current gov't is doing with them.
yes jumping on the fed cash rebate is always good, but decisions like these, and the way they have been handled, is down right stupid.
you'd think campbell's media relations, and liberal party would have put up a red flag saying "the public isnt gonna handle this good, maybe we should at least act humble about it and play it off." but instead its do it first, ask for permission 2nd. they are hired and elected, not the other way around. technically speaking the gov't is the employee, and the public is the employer, thats why they are called public civil servants. Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 How would you "explain it to the public" without "dropping the bomb"?
What you really mean is "explain it to the public" and "let the public have an opportunity to say NO" and reject it. There is no opportunity to reject this, its a federal mandate, and either BC can take the cash bribe and run or wait till Ottawa mandates the change and get nothing.
Its not going into affect for a year, so its hardly "dropping the bomb". Peple just don't like change or taxes and want to bitch/whine/complain. | |
| |
09-02-2009, 10:50 AM
|
#18 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: 604
Posts: 4,015
Thanked 475 Times in 285 Posts
Failed 115 Times in 24 Posts
|
it is like the carbon tax and it screws over the average joe We will even be taxed on things that were not taxable before like bike safety gear, like helmets for cyclists and motorcyclists for example.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 11:38 AM
|
#19 | Pull Out Towing. Women rescued for free.
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Hongcouver
Posts: 8,449
Thanked 2,414 Times in 1,283 Posts
Failed 128 Times in 71 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightwalker Looking forward to the decrease in tax on alcohol | It was talked about on the news last night. Though the HST will bring down the tax on alcohol, the BC government is adding another tax to alcohol so in the end, the price isn't going to come down.
__________________ Originally posted by Iceman_19 you should have tried to touch his penis. that really throws them off. Originally posted by The7even SumAznGuy > Billboa Originally posted by 1990TSI SumAznGuy> Internet > tinytrix Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu1413 and icing on the cake, lady driving a newer chrysler 200 infront of me... jumped out of her car, dropped her pants, did an immediate squat and did probably the longest public relief ever...... steam and all. | (11-0-0) Buy/Sell rating Christine Shitvic Pull Out Towing |
| |
09-02-2009, 12:06 PM
|
#20 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,457
Thanked 2,259 Times in 439 Posts
Failed 595 Times in 124 Posts
|
i'm not in favour of the sales tax because i'm the consumer.. and when it comes down to it i have no control over what price i pay. i just know i have to pay it.
if the HST actually works then the consumer "should" see the benefits.. i just find it hard to believe that companies who are making more money by saving on PST will actually pass those savings down to us? isn't it all about their bottom line.. so if they're making more why would they lower their prices?
BUT, in theory i do agree with the HST... i'm just weary about the practical application..
and only if our bitching and whining is going to do anything... what's done is done.. and HST is coming july 2010 ftw or failblog... we'll see.
|
| |
09-02-2009, 12:20 PM
|
#21 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Richmond
Posts: 11,187
Thanked 1,320 Times in 331 Posts
Failed 162 Times in 29 Posts
|
Economies will always go up and down. I wonder what the next tax will be when the next recession hits
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by Girl ^ Yes it's sad when you stare at the shape of my penis through my overly skin tight jeans and not help but feel like a shameful little boy compared to me. | |
| |
09-02-2009, 12:52 PM
|
#22 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Yaletown Snob
Posts: 1,119
Thanked 53 Times in 27 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 4 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminate Economies will always go up and down. I wonder what the next tax will be when the next recession hits | Next one is increase in MSP....
Oh wait.. its coming.. Jan 2010
|
| |
09-03-2009, 08:22 AM
|
#23 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kits/Richmond
Posts: 4,409
Thanked 1,105 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 222 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG "dropping the bomb" also means you dont have a choice, here you go! | We don't have a choice. We elect officials to make the choices for us.
I was in Ontario when the "bomb was dropped" about HST. The general public had the same complaints, why? cause they didn't get a choice.
Guess what? The Ontario Liberals ran a campaign of no tax changes too, yet HST goes into affect next year. Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG the way gov't works, decisions on something such as HST arent made within days. Also opposition party, let alone the rest of the house didnt even know of the HST. | Any politician would have to be stupid not to know HST was coming, its been a federal mandate. The opposition parties are just pandering. Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG I wont even begin to mention the budget being so far off. come on, if u build a house, and you do go over budget, its lets say, worse case scenario, 50% over budget, its within reason. but the gov'ts "estimation" was so far off, 5 times if not more than what was estimated. sure our economy took a dump this year, but come on, grade 10 business ed taught us how to better balance our books than how the current gov't is doing with them. | You mean the deficit is 5x higher. LOL Here's some math:
$2.8B is about 7% of the $39B budget, and the difference of $2.3B from the previous $0.5B deficit is only 6% of total revenue.
I may not have taken grade 10 Business Ed, yet +/-6% seems reasonable to adjust for. Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG yes jumping on the fed cash rebate is always good, but decisions like these, and the way they have been handled, is down right stupid. | Its only stupid cause you don't get a vote. Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG you'd think campbell's media relations, and liberal party would have put up a red flag saying "the public isnt gonna handle this good, maybe we should at least act humble about it and play it off." but instead its do it first, ask for permission 2nd. | This is where the crux of your argument falls flat on its face. There is no "asking for permission", either the province does it, or Ottawa mandates it eventually. We're the 4th last province to implement the HST, with only Nova Scotia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan left. Not exactly good company when all the other big populated provinces have already jumped on board.
I'm sorry you feel this way, yet every politician isn't going to ask for your permission on every decision. Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG they are hired and elected, not the other way around. technically speaking the gov't is the employee, and the public is the employer, thats why they are called public civil servants. | Ah, so you do expect to be consulted on every decision government makes.
Here's where you're wrong: They are elected, and work for us, yet we elect them once every 4 years to make decisions for us.
Did they have to consult you on the tax decreases over the past decade that has BCians paying far less income tax now (about $2K on $70K/yr)? That same decision is impacting the budget now, having taken away money in good times that could have been used to balance the budget in bad times.
Personally I'd love to be consulted on tax decreases. Taxes should not be decreased in good times, they should be raised and put into rainy-day accounts for future bad times. Yet I wasn't consulted (not withstanding that I didn't live here).
|
| |
09-03-2009, 10:11 AM
|
#24 | Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Surrey
Posts: 12,760
Thanked 689 Times in 376 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 38 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SlySi Next one is increase in MSP....
Oh wait.. its coming.. Jan 2010 | yup, motherfuckers making us pay more for msp now. Our cost of living here is unbelievable! |
| |
09-03-2009, 10:27 AM
|
#25 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,687
Thanked 731 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 29 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor192 We don't have a choice. We elect officials to make the choices for us.
I was in Ontario when the "bomb was dropped" about HST. The general public had the same complaints, why? cause they didn't get a choice.
Guess what? The Ontario Liberals ran a campaign of no tax changes too, yet HST goes into affect next year.
Any politician would have to be stupid not to know HST was coming, its been a federal mandate. The opposition parties are just pandering.
You mean the deficit is 5x higher. LOL Here's some math:
$2.8B is about 7% of the $39B budget, and the difference of $2.3B from the previous $0.5B deficit is only 6% of total revenue.
I may not have taken grade 10 Business Ed, yet +/-6% seems reasonable to adjust for.
Its only stupid cause you don't get a vote.
This is where the crux of your argument falls flat on its face. There is no "asking for permission", either the province does it, or Ottawa mandates it eventually. We're the 4th last province to implement the HST, with only Nova Scotia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan left. Not exactly good company when all the other big populated provinces have already jumped on board.
I'm sorry you feel this way, yet every politician isn't going to ask for your permission on every decision.
Ah, so you do expect to be consulted on every decision government makes.
Here's where you're wrong: They are elected, and work for us, yet we elect them once every 4 years to make decisions for us.
Did they have to consult you on the tax decreases over the past decade that has BCians paying far less income tax now (about $2K on $70K/yr)? That same decision is impacting the budget now, having taken away money in good times that could have been used to balance the budget in bad times.
Personally I'd love to be consulted on tax decreases. Taxes should not be decreased in good times, they should be raised and put into rainy-day accounts for future bad times. Yet I wasn't consulted (not withstanding that I didn't live here). | I may not completely agree, but quoted for being a good post, unlike some other comments on this thread. . ..
|
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:43 AM. |