REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-12-2009, 05:13 PM   #51
Witness protection
 
thumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu View Post
GLK is built in the states i believe, much better deal though, C350 4 matic will be around 50 base, whereas GLK is around 8k cheaper, I DON'T GET IT!?!?!?
maybe because of NAFTA that makes the US-built GLK cheaper than the euro-built c-class?
Advertisement
thumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 05:22 PM   #52
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Most probably, that and the C-class is pretty good looking compared to... yeah
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 04:57 PM   #53
Need my Daily Fix of RS
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 261
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
tahoe?
BLU_LU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:39 AM   #54
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
wasabisashimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
looking at an used S4 AVANT... hows the trunk space, and fuel economy, should be better than Jeep SRT8?
__________________
my feedback
Click here to visit my feedback
wasabisashimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:49 AM   #55
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 View Post
You don't buy a Mercedes expecting top notch craftsmanship. You just buy it because your folks said they were good. And you ponder about that sitting in the middle of the intersection thinking, "what good?".
well anytime u buy a high end car u better expect some sort of high end craftsmanship for the money u pay
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 06:27 AM   #56
Witness protection
 
thumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wasabisashimi View Post
looking at an used S4 AVANT... hows the trunk space, and fuel economy, should be better than Jeep SRT8?
fuel economy is the pits. i spoke to someone who used to own one (i think it was a 2005 model? i forget ), and i recall him mentioning 14mpg city with a moderately heavy foot. i didn't ask which transmission he had though.

... but if you bought one i wouldn't disagree with your choice
thumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 07:42 AM   #57
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wasabisashimi View Post
looking at an used S4 AVANT... hows the trunk space, and fuel economy, should be better than Jeep SRT8?
My friend worked on a S4 and a RS4 before. He said that the engine (4.2L V8) kills itself like crazy. You will need to have an engine rebuild every 100k or so.
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 09:05 AM   #58
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
B-DiZzLe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,349
Thanked 56 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 View Post
I always thought this is the shittiest name ever

"Denial Hybrid" yeah I'm saving the planet by driving a hybrid - Denial.


It's Denali, not Denial.
__________________
If you don't like me you can blow me.
B-DiZzLe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 09:34 AM   #59
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugen EvOlutioN View Post
^


werd

than next question would be

wat about M X6


Faggot honger bois with a bigger wallet
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 10:04 AM   #60
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar View Post
My friend worked on a S4 and a RS4 before. He said that the engine (4.2L V8) kills itself like crazy. You will need to have an engine rebuild every 100k or so.
what the fuck are you talking about? an engine rebuild every 100k? you know that's considered a lemon right? first of all, the engine on the RS4 is completely different from the S4 engine. the problem with the RS4 engines in the intake manifold gets clogged up with oil, but we're not talking about RS4's here. the S4 wagon has the 4.2 V8 with 340 HP. not the RS4's V8 with 420 HP. the 340 HP engines are built like tanks. My car currently has 140km, never had a single problem with the engine. S4 Wagon might be a bit small for a dog and all that, take a look at it, see how you like it. If you find it too small, I would suggest an allroad. get an 04+ with a 4.2, dont bother with the 2.7T unless you want to mod it. Allroads have adjustible air suspension, lots of room inside, and can go anywhere an SUV can. If you want a new car, I would suggest the Q5 or the Q7 TDI. Diesel is the way to go. Great fuel economy, great torque, cheap fuel...
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 10:12 AM   #61
My homepage has been set to RS
 
xpl0sive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
or if you want to get serious.... i would suggest this

http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/bn...369326125.html

V10 Twin Turbo Diesel... you can haul anything you want with that thing. chip it and you got 800 ft/lb of torque
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap

A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
xpl0sive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 10:49 AM   #62
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
shenmecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by xpl0sive View Post
what the fuck are you talking about? an engine rebuild every 100k? you know that's considered a lemon right? first of all, the engine on the RS4 is completely different from the S4 engine. the problem with the RS4 engines in the intake manifold gets clogged up with oil, but we're not talking about RS4's here. the S4 wagon has the 4.2 V8 with 340 HP. not the RS4's V8 with 420 HP. the 340 HP engines are built like tanks. My car currently has 140km, never had a single problem with the engine. S4 Wagon might be a bit small for a dog and all that, take a look at it, see how you like it. If you find it too small, I would suggest an allroad. get an 04+ with a 4.2, dont bother with the 2.7T unless you want to mod it. Allroads have adjustible air suspension, lots of room inside, and can go anywhere an SUV can. If you want a new car, I would suggest the Q5 or the Q7 TDI. Diesel is the way to go. Great fuel economy, great torque, cheap fuel...
meh, thats what I heard.
shenmecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 11:49 AM   #63
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
teaoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 511
Thanked 28 Times in 15 Posts
INFINITI QX56!
teaoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 11:58 AM   #64
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 631
Thanked 155 Times in 36 Posts
I can't believe no one suggested Mazda CX-9 yet. It doesn't have the luxury brand cachet, but it drives as well, if not better than them. It's also not common like Rav4, RDX, GLK etc.

Great crossover. Lots of room, seats 7, handles like a car, reliable. Car magazines have also gave it stellar reviews.

Prostrho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:03 PM   #65
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
wasabisashimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prostrho View Post
I can't believe no one suggested Mazda CX-9 yet. It doesn't have the luxury brand cachet, but it drives as well, if not better than them. It's also not common like Rav4, RDX, GLK etc.

Great crossover. Lots of room, seats 7, handles like a car, reliable. Car magazines have also gave it stellar reviews.

does mazda have full time awd on this one? like quattro or Terrain response system on the LR2 . OR is it just the type used in CRV and RAV4
__________________
my feedback
Click here to visit my feedback
wasabisashimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:51 PM   #66
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 631
Thanked 155 Times in 36 Posts
It is a Haldex system similar to Quattro of A3/TT, but not the same as A4/Q5 etc.

Mostly front biased to save fuel, but it automatically transfers power to the wheels that need it more before it loses grip. So it is considered a full time AWD. Actually the Rav4 system is similar. So is FX35, which is rear biased, but power is transfered to the front wheels during acceleration and cornering. etc.

CRV on the otherhand does NOT transfer power until wheelspin occurs.
Prostrho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:03 PM   #67
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
wasabisashimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
how come these systems sounded like a traction control system as oppose to full time symetrical system
__________________
my feedback
Click here to visit my feedback
wasabisashimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:25 PM   #68
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 631
Thanked 155 Times in 36 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haldex_Traction

Just realised LR2 is actually a Haldex based 4wd system as well!!!!

Cause a full time awd system with 50/50 torque split wastes gas, and is not generally needed for normal commuter vehicles.
Prostrho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 08:51 PM   #69
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
asahai69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,805
Thanked 1,260 Times in 321 Posts
get a fucking new 4 runner and be done with it.
asahai69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 09:11 PM   #70
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 135
Thanked 27 Times in 6 Posts
Ford Flex - 340hp twin-turbo v6. Oh, and it has all the other stuff that you were looking for
luke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 09:11 PM   #71
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by teaoh View Post
INFINITI QX56!
THat thing is like $80-90g depending on options
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prostrho View Post
I can't believe no one suggested Mazda CX-9 yet. It doesn't have the luxury brand cachet, but it drives as well, if not better than them. It's also not common like Rav4, RDX, GLK etc.

Great crossover. Lots of room, seats 7, handles like a car, reliable. Car magazines have also gave it stellar reviews.

CX-9 aint exactly CHEAP, $45-47g before taxes if i remember correctly. And spending nearly $50g most people would want some sort of luxury image.
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 10:10 AM   #72
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
wasabisashimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
ya, I want some car with luxury and brand image. 4 runner wont cut it, CX-9 wont do ( I dont need a 7 seater), Ford Flex isnt up there although twin turbo sounded cool.

Update, Cars still in the list: Q5, jeep SRT8 ( wife doesn't like the look), Maybe MDX, volvo XC60
__________________
my feedback
Click here to visit my feedback
wasabisashimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 11:32 AM   #73
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 631
Thanked 155 Times in 36 Posts
U can't go wrong with a MDX then.. they have 8000$ off 2009 models as well.
Prostrho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 11:34 AM   #74
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
ya MDX is gonna be ur best bet. Cheapest, reliable, , very very nice interior finish/material,decent look, SH-AWD

300hp, 275ish torque

sits 7, lots of room. and around $45-55g
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 11:40 AM   #75
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
RE-Jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,046
Thanked 108 Times in 39 Posts
Volvo XC60 ~ looks really nice especially in white.
__________________
FD coming back online~
RE-Jo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net