REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2010, 11:23 PM   #1
My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
 
Kamui712's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,810
Thanked 736 Times in 167 Posts
Failed 175 Times in 39 Posts
What am I doing wrong? *pics*

Very Very Amateur photographer here. Previously had really poor, blurry pictures in dim lighting, I thought that the reason was my lens 50-200mm lens. So here at dinner I'm using a 50mm 1.8f prime on a Canon XTi.

Apperature is at 1.8, iso 1600. Pictures are clear, yet the color is dull, and rather dark. What can I do to get some nice vivid colors?

*ignore the bad framing and everything, I would just like to know how to get some good lighting and colors going.

Your input is appreciated!




Advertisement
Kamui712 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 01:16 AM   #2
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
You need to set your white balance to whatever the light in the restaurant is - probably tungsten. If you shot these in RAW, then you can go back and change it.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 01:40 AM   #3
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
^
Werd~ RAW is your best friend and memory cards are dirt cheap these days.

Regarding the shots, pics need more purpose and be more playful with lights. Photography is an art of light capture. Purpose as the main thing you want to describe in the shot.

Last but not least, google "photography composition" and play around with them.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 03:04 AM   #4
RS controls my life!
 
Dangerphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 702
Thanked 107 Times in 47 Posts
Failed 29 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever View Post
You need to set your white balance to whatever the light in the restaurant is - probably tungsten. If you shot these in RAW, then you can go back and change it.
Question: Just RAW or RAW + L ....which is better?
Dangerphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 04:54 AM   #5
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
hud 91gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,377
Thanked 4,003 Times in 1,546 Posts
Failed 35 Times in 27 Posts
I beleive the RAW + L will take a Jpeg as well as a RAW image...
__________________
Crush - 1971 Datsun 240z - Build Thread
The Daily - Rav4 V6 - “Goldilocks”
hud 91gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 09:06 AM   #6
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
I shoot RAW only. You would want to output your own RAW-->JPG anyway. Softwares offer better conversion than in-camera.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 09:28 AM   #7
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
shooting with such a high ISO will cause noise. Its not as noticeable on your smaller images. Getting a flash and bouncing it would improve your image. It would also solve your blurry images in dim lighting.
keitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:02 AM   #8
YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
 
CP.AR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FL400
Posts: 5,871
Thanked 3,113 Times in 1,043 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 158 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by keitaro View Post
shooting with such a high ISO will cause noise. Its not as noticeable on your smaller images. Getting a flash and bouncing it would improve your image. It would also solve your blurry images in dim lighting.
Agreed, especially with the XTi's Digic 2 processor, ISO 1600 should only be a last resort
__________________
Where the hell am I
CP.AR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:21 AM   #9
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
If you do shoot JPEG and feel that you don't want to use RAW, you can use adobe photoshop lightroom to adjust your white balance, exposure, saturation, etc. Just a little post processing can improve an image. Just don't over do it.

If your going to shoot raw, your going to have to spend more time post processing in lightroom/bridge/photoshop. In the end, you get more flexibility and quality in an image. I personally shoot strictly in RAW only.
keitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:40 AM   #10
$_$
I subscribe to Revscene
 
$_$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Space
Posts: 1,990
Thanked 612 Times in 193 Posts
Failed 75 Times in 34 Posts
Haha.... I hear all the pros shoot in only RAW...
$_$ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 11:25 AM   #11
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
^ if your serious about photography, raw is the best option and choice.

here is a good article on why raw is better
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...mera-raw.shtml
keitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 06:05 PM   #12
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Levitron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rmd, BC
Posts: 9,951
Thanked 378 Times in 66 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamui712 View Post
Very Very Amateur photographer here. Previously had really poor, blurry pictures in dim lighting, I thought that the reason was my lens 50-200mm lens. So here at dinner I'm using a 50mm 1.8f prime on a Canon XTi.

Apperature is at 1.8, iso 1600. Pictures are clear, yet the color is dull, and rather dark. What can I do to get some nice vivid colors?

*ignore the bad framing and everything, I would just like to know how to get some good lighting and colors going.

Your input is appreciated!
To answer your question, the best thing to keep in mind for your pictures is the fact that without good lighting, you simply aren't going to get "nice vivid colors".

Your picture will only be as good as the light that touches your sensor...and the light that exists in a dimly lit restaurant is not enough to make those vivid colors fly out at you.
__________________
All hail 2.3 turbo
RIP: long live 1.6
-Former S.O.M.O. Vive la resistance!
-MFC Fan # 3
-RS ELITE NINJA smurf-ninja
-L.B.C.: REVscene's Resident Lowballers
-RS Photography Crew WpnOfChoice: Sony DSC-F717~"Dana"


http://www.flickr.com/duckducksnap
Levitron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 06:11 PM   #13
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
vietfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 244
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Invest into a hotshoe flash
vietfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 11:41 PM   #14
My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
 
Kamui712's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,810
Thanked 736 Times in 167 Posts
Failed 175 Times in 39 Posts
thanks for all the replies guys, I did some tests in shooting jpeg vs raw and there is definitely more flexibility and higher quality with RAW.

regarding flash and lighting, what are your feelings around using those ebay diffusers for the on-camera flash?

Hot shoe flashes tend to be a little bigger than my liking



Kamui712 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 11:50 PM   #15
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
^^ Those will help a bit, but because the original light source is so small, there are only very limited things that can be done.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 10:42 AM   #16
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
Yeah, invest in a small and cheap flash. In Nikon, we have a SB400. I carry it around with my D700. It's better than in camera flash and gets a lot of thing done without the bulky-ness.

Canon I think they have a 2x0-EX flash?
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 11:10 AM   #17
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
^Canon has the 430EX II as an entry level flash. the 580EX II Prosumer model.
keitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 11:26 AM   #18
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 505
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by keitaro View Post
^Canon has the 430EX II as an entry level flash. the 580EX II Prosumer model.
^ he mentioned he doesn't want to lug around even something like the 430ex II

smaller option would be the 270ex

hoking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 11:29 AM   #19
My homepage has been set to RS
 
77civic1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,296
Thanked 1,292 Times in 312 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
^entry level is the 270EX as he was saying:

http://www.bccamera.com/index.php?ma...oducts_id=3505
__________________
flickr

Last edited by 77civic1200; 01-28-2010 at 11:29 AM. Reason: *hoking beat me to it
77civic1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 11:51 AM   #20
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
^ yea i just realized that now. you can't really call it a useful flash. It produces the same power as your on-board pop-up flash.

the minimum that should be bought is the 430.
keitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 12:21 PM   #21
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,098
Thanked 206 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 16 Posts
^ Can you even change the angle of the 270EX?

Might as well invest in a 480EX. =]
__________________
:o
ecchiecchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 12:31 PM   #22
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 505
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by keitaro View Post
^ yea i just realized that now. you can't really call it a useful flash. It produces the same power as your on-board pop-up flash.

the minimum that should be bought is the 430.
not really, the 270 has wider coverage and longer distance then a regular pop-up flash,.. and it does have the bounce flash ability
hoking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 01:58 PM   #23
My homepage has been set to RS
 
77civic1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,296
Thanked 1,292 Times in 312 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
XTi flash has a guide number of 13m
The 270ex has a guide number of 27m

I would hardly call those the same power?
__________________
flickr
77civic1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 02:45 PM   #24
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
keitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
^ i was wrong. I admit it. I just remembering reading somewhere that it was a weak flash.

I still standby the 430EX as a minimum for a ext flash.
keitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 03:32 PM   #25
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
^

Yeah, a full size flash like 430EX is great for proper flash jobs. But the OP is just starting. His photography style might not even need a flash at all.

I have a full set of SB800+SB600 combo, but that's not what I carry around in my bag. I only carry them when I know I'm gonna need them. Hence a suggestion of small flash like 270EX/SB400. These little flashes are a lot cheaper and way more versatile than the in-cam one.

I got my SB400 for like 85USD shipped. It's a great little unit to have it in your bag for the unforeseen event of a flash need.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net