Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |  | |
01-25-2010, 11:23 PM
|
#1 | My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,810
Thanked 736 Times in 167 Posts
Failed 175 Times in 39 Posts
| What am I doing wrong? *pics*
Very Very Amateur photographer here. Previously had really poor, blurry pictures in dim lighting, I thought that the reason was my lens 50-200mm lens. So here at dinner I'm using a 50mm 1.8f prime on a Canon XTi.
Apperature is at 1.8, iso 1600. Pictures are clear, yet the color is dull, and rather dark. What can I do to get some nice vivid colors?
*ignore the bad framing and everything, I would just like to know how to get some good lighting and colors going.
Your input is appreciated! |
| |
01-26-2010, 01:16 AM
|
#2 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
You need to set your white balance to whatever the light in the restaurant is - probably tungsten. If you shot these in RAW, then you can go back and change it.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
01-26-2010, 01:40 AM
|
#3 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
|
^
Werd~ RAW is your best friend and memory cards are dirt cheap these days.
Regarding the shots, pics need more purpose and be more playful with lights. Photography is an art of light capture. Purpose as the main thing you want to describe in the shot.
Last but not least, google "photography composition" and play around with them.
__________________
Nothing for now
|
| |
01-26-2010, 03:04 AM
|
#4 | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 702
Thanked 107 Times in 47 Posts
Failed 29 Times in 6 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever You need to set your white balance to whatever the light in the restaurant is - probably tungsten. If you shot these in RAW, then you can go back and change it. | Question: Just RAW or RAW + L ....which is better?
|
| |
01-26-2010, 04:54 AM
|
#5 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,377
Thanked 4,003 Times in 1,546 Posts
Failed 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
I beleive the RAW + L will take a Jpeg as well as a RAW image...
__________________
Crush - 1971 Datsun 240z - Build Thread
The Daily - Rav4 V6 - “Goldilocks”
|
| |
01-26-2010, 09:06 AM
|
#6 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
|
I shoot RAW only. You would want to output your own RAW-->JPG anyway. Softwares offer better conversion than in-camera.
__________________
Nothing for now
|
| |
01-26-2010, 09:28 AM
|
#7 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
shooting with such a high ISO will cause noise. Its not as noticeable on your smaller images. Getting a flash and bouncing it would improve your image. It would also solve your blurry images in dim lighting.
|
| |
01-26-2010, 10:02 AM
|
#8 | YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: FL400
Posts: 5,871
Thanked 3,113 Times in 1,043 Posts
Failed 555 Times in 158 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by keitaro shooting with such a high ISO will cause noise. Its not as noticeable on your smaller images. Getting a flash and bouncing it would improve your image. It would also solve your blurry images in dim lighting. | Agreed, especially with the XTi's Digic 2 processor, ISO 1600 should only be a last resort
__________________
Where the hell am I
|
| |
01-26-2010, 10:21 AM
|
#9 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
If you do shoot JPEG and feel that you don't want to use RAW, you can use adobe photoshop lightroom to adjust your white balance, exposure, saturation, etc. Just a little post processing can improve an image. Just don't over do it.
If your going to shoot raw, your going to have to spend more time post processing in lightroom/bridge/photoshop. In the end, you get more flexibility and quality in an image. I personally shoot strictly in RAW only.
|
| |
01-26-2010, 10:40 AM
|
#10 | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Space
Posts: 1,990
Thanked 612 Times in 193 Posts
Failed 75 Times in 34 Posts
|
Haha.... I hear all the pros shoot in only RAW...
|
| |
01-26-2010, 11:25 AM
|
#11 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
^ if your serious about photography, raw is the best option and choice.
here is a good article on why raw is better http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...mera-raw.shtml |
| |
01-26-2010, 06:05 PM
|
#12 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Rmd, BC
Posts: 9,951
Thanked 378 Times in 66 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 7 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamui712 Very Very Amateur photographer here. Previously had really poor, blurry pictures in dim lighting, I thought that the reason was my lens 50-200mm lens. So here at dinner I'm using a 50mm 1.8f prime on a Canon XTi.
Apperature is at 1.8, iso 1600. Pictures are clear, yet the color is dull, and rather dark. What can I do to get some nice vivid colors?
*ignore the bad framing and everything, I would just like to know how to get some good lighting and colors going.
Your input is appreciated! | To answer your question, the best thing to keep in mind for your pictures is the fact that without good lighting, you simply aren't going to get "nice vivid colors".
Your picture will only be as good as the light that touches your sensor...and the light that exists in a dimly lit restaurant is not enough to make those vivid colors fly out at you.
__________________ All hail 2.3 turbo RIP: long live 1.6
-Former S.O.M.O. Vive la resistance!
-MFC Fan # 3
-RS ELITE NINJA smurf-ninja
-L.B.C.: REVscene's Resident Lowballers
-RS Photography Crew WpnOfChoice: Sony DSC-F717~"Dana" http://www.flickr.com/duckducksnap |
| |
01-26-2010, 06:11 PM
|
#13 | Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 244
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Invest into a hotshoe flash
|
| |
01-27-2010, 11:41 PM
|
#14 | My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,810
Thanked 736 Times in 167 Posts
Failed 175 Times in 39 Posts
|
thanks for all the replies guys, I did some tests in shooting jpeg vs raw and there is definitely more flexibility and higher quality with RAW.
regarding flash and lighting, what are your feelings around using those ebay diffusers for the on-camera flash?
Hot shoe flashes tend to be a little bigger than my liking |
| |
01-27-2010, 11:50 PM
|
#15 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
^^ Those will help a bit, but because the original light source is so small, there are only very limited things that can be done.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
01-28-2010, 10:42 AM
|
#16 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
|
Yeah, invest in a small and cheap flash. In Nikon, we have a SB400. I carry it around with my D700. It's better than in camera flash and gets a lot of thing done without the bulky-ness.
Canon I think they have a 2x0-EX flash?
__________________
Nothing for now
|
| |
01-28-2010, 11:10 AM
|
#17 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
^Canon has the 430EX II as an entry level flash. the 580EX II Prosumer model.
|
| |
01-28-2010, 11:26 AM
|
#18 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 505
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by keitaro ^Canon has the 430EX II as an entry level flash. the 580EX II Prosumer model. | ^ he mentioned he doesn't want to lug around even something like the 430ex II
smaller option would be the 270ex |
| |
01-28-2010, 11:29 AM
|
#19 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,296
Thanked 1,292 Times in 312 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
Last edited by 77civic1200; 01-28-2010 at 11:29 AM.
Reason: *hoking beat me to it
|
| |
01-28-2010, 11:51 AM
|
#20 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
^ yea i just realized that now. you can't really call it a useful flash. It produces the same power as your on-board pop-up flash.
the minimum that should be bought is the 430.
|
| |
01-28-2010, 12:21 PM
|
#21 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,098
Thanked 206 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 16 Posts
|
^ Can you even change the angle of the 270EX?
Might as well invest in a 480EX. =]
__________________
:o
|
| |
01-28-2010, 12:31 PM
|
#22 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 505
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by keitaro ^ yea i just realized that now. you can't really call it a useful flash. It produces the same power as your on-board pop-up flash.
the minimum that should be bought is the 430. | not really, the 270 has wider coverage and longer distance then a regular pop-up flash,.. and it does have the bounce flash ability
|
| |
01-28-2010, 01:58 PM
|
#23 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,296
Thanked 1,292 Times in 312 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
XTi flash has a guide number of 13m
The 270ex has a guide number of 27m
I would hardly call those the same power?
|
| |
01-28-2010, 02:45 PM
|
#24 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Trenton, ON
Posts: 4,818
Thanked 131 Times in 52 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
|
^ i was wrong. I admit it. I just remembering reading somewhere that it was a weak flash.
I still standby the 430EX as a minimum for a ext flash.
|
| |
01-28-2010, 03:32 PM
|
#25 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,976
Thanked 3,064 Times in 1,338 Posts
Failed 661 Times in 212 Posts
|
^
Yeah, a full size flash like 430EX is great for proper flash jobs. But the OP is just starting. His photography style might not even need a flash at all.
I have a full set of SB800+SB600 combo, but that's not what I carry around in my bag. I only carry them when I know I'm gonna need them. Hence a suggestion of small flash like 270EX/SB400. These little flashes are a lot cheaper and way more versatile than the in-cam one.
I got my SB400 for like 85USD shipped. It's a great little unit to have it in your bag for the unforeseen event of a flash need.
__________________
Nothing for now
|
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM. |