REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Computer Tech, Gaming & Electronics (https://www.revscene.net/forums/computer-tech-gaming-electronics_32/)
-   -   LED TV Sharp vs Toshiba (https://www.revscene.net/forums/615728-led-tv-sharp-vs-toshiba.html)

GomGom 05-26-2010 12:10 PM

LED TV Sharp vs Toshiba
 
I'm in between these
- Sharp 46" Class LED-LCD 1080p 120Hz HDTV, LC-C46700UN
- Toshiba 46" Class LED-LCD 1080p 240Hz HDTV, 46SV670U

The toshiba is $100 more expensive than sharp. Any suggestion??

Mugen EvOlutioN 05-26-2010 12:11 PM

hmmm tought choice


wats samsungs LED price like?
if not too much go with samsung

FN-2199 05-26-2010 12:18 PM

Here's the main question: Do you want a higher refresh rate? If so, pay the extra $100.
You can find better TVs for that price, IMO.

GomGom 05-26-2010 12:19 PM

Samsung 46" Class 1080p 120Hz LCD HDTV, LN46C630 has the same price as Sharp. Samsung UN46C5000 is $350 more expensive than Sharp.

GomGom 05-26-2010 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iRomey (Post 6966161)
Here's the main question: Do you want a higher refresh rate? If so, pay the extra $100.
You can find better TVs for that price, IMO.

Does it make any big difference from 120Hz? I want to get the best picture out of the TV. Toshiba's MSRP from their site is way more expensive than Sharp but the price is not that much higher in the store.

Oh, Toshiba is 1" thicker than Sharp.

dachinesedude 05-26-2010 12:26 PM

IMO of all the LED TV's i've seen, Samsung has the best picture quality, i'd fork out the extra bucks for that

FN-2199 05-26-2010 12:27 PM

Higher refresh rate equates to less motion blur, but there isn't much difference between 120Hz and 240Hz.
You sound more interested in the Sharp TV, though.

+1 for Samsung TV's on the lighter note :)

TOPEC 05-26-2010 12:27 PM

i would go with the sharp, 1 i the sharp LED myself, not sure if its the same series, 2, 120Hz vs 240Hz is minimal, its a marketing gimick, u'll only notice the difference if u look really hard, or a tv nerd. and 3 i would get the sharp just cause its 1inch thinner so it hangs closer to the wall.

If u have the money, or are willing to spend the money, get samsung units, they're pretty much the best out there, but if u dont have the money, go with sharp.

Manic! 05-26-2010 01:49 PM

Go plasma and don't worry about refresh rates.

roastpuff 05-26-2010 01:58 PM

If you want LED TV, go with Samsung. Much better picture quality.

Also, plasma if your situation works for it. Color is amazing, and much better blacks still. Also cheaper per inch.

TOPEC 05-26-2010 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manic! (Post 6966285)
Go plasma and don't worry about refresh rates.

and worry about their "600Hz" software enhanced refresh rate?

Manic! 05-26-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RX_Renesis (Post 6966300)
and worry about their "600Hz" software enhanced refresh rate?

Most are 480 and there is no motion blur with any plasma.

RabidRat 05-26-2010 03:48 PM

What IS the disadvantage with plasma anyway? They're cheaper for the size and nicer. So why not?

!Aznboi128 05-26-2010 03:51 PM

^ heat, heavy, glass surface, burn-in, brightness

nabs 05-26-2010 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iRomey (Post 6966170)
Higher refresh rate equates to less motion blur, but there isn't much difference between 120Hz and 240Hz.
You sound more interested in the Sharp TV, though.

+1 for Samsung TV's on the lighter note :)

i would beg to differ, go check out the 240Hz tv's side by side 120Hz, enormous difference.

This is the reason im getting a 3dTV soon :D

trd2343 05-26-2010 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aznboi128 (Post 6966455)
^ heat, heavy, glass surface, burn-in, brightness

I've always wondered, how's weight a disadvantage? Are you like moving your TV THAT often that it being heavier becomes a disadvantage?


As for burn-in, I say that is more of a user-created problem. Unless you seriously do need the TV on 24/7, turn it off when you're not using it, simple as that.

Manic! 05-26-2010 06:14 PM

Burn in has not been a problem for at least a few years. Heat can be a problem but the better picture quality is worth it.

JesseBlue 05-26-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reamemiya (Post 6966621)
I've always wondered, how's weight a disadvantage? Are you like moving your TV THAT often that it being heavier becomes a disadvantage?


As for burn-in, I say that is more of a user-created problem. Unless you seriously do need the TV on 24/7, turn it off when you're not using it, simple as that.

you'll think about it more when you decide to mount it to the wall...

Manic! 05-26-2010 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JesseBlue (Post 6966720)
you'll think about it more when you decide to mount it to the wall...

Mounting a Plasma with 2 people in no problem and you only do it once.

Mugen EvOlutioN 05-28-2010 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dachinesedude (Post 6966168)
IMO of all the LED TV's i've seen, Samsung has the best picture quality, i'd fork out the extra bucks for that

werd

samsung basically has the best of everything now

the regular LCD, and they dominate the LED market now as well

woot +1 for samsung

loving mine

Tapioca 05-28-2010 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JesseBlue (Post 6966720)
you'll think about it more when you decide to mount it to the wall...

Mounting TVs to walls is over-rated. Most set-ups I've seen have TVs mounted too high and this puts a strain on your neck after a while. It would have been more effective to mount my TV over the fireplace, like every Jack and Jill condo dweller, but I decided to buy a stand instead and save my neck.

Besides, where the heck would I have housed my components?

Most videophiles and home-theatre enthusiasts only go for one type of TV and that is a plasma made by Pioneer. Unfortunately Pioneer has stopped making TVs so the prices for used Kuros have remained steady. People always talk about power consumption and heat, but who really watches TV for several hours a day to actually have these things become a factor?

smk 05-28-2010 11:01 AM

+1 for Samsung, got two of those myself and a computer LCD monitor
I work at a place that sells TV, and I find Samsung LCD/LED have the best quality when compared to other brands...

6insomnia9 05-28-2010 11:19 AM

I went to see some TVs at Bestbuy last Sunday, the first TV i noticed was the Samsung 8 Series TV. I compared it to other TVs and none of them were as clear as the one i was looking at, best bet is to go for Samsung as they progressively kill the competition, in quality but you have to pay the extra bucks , imo it is worth it.

Mugen EvOlutioN 05-28-2010 11:34 AM

^


yup worth it in my opinion as well


i did my homework and looked for it for 2 years, and finally set on one of their bad boys. More than joyful owning it.....worth the money

GomGom 05-29-2010 01:02 AM

Yeah, i'm keeping an eye on Samsung UN46C6300 for now. Should I go with LED 6 series or LCD 7/8 series?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net