REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   The Official 2010/2011 Canucks Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/617486-official-2010-2011-canucks-thread.html)

Ch28 04-10-2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jigga250 (Post 7384315)
Hawks still have Toews, Kane, Hossa, Sharp, Keith, and Seabrook, and possibly a psychological edge over Luongo. Dallas has Morrow, Richards, Eriksson, and......Ribeiro? Its not even close IMO. Look at our games vs them this year and how tight all the Chicago games were, while the Dallas games were all basically borderline blowouts.

+1

Voice of reason right here.

LUUUUUUUU 04-10-2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sentinel (Post 7384321)
Could really use Malhotra this series...

it's ok! they're gonna do it for Manny :fuckyea:

Ch28 04-10-2011 04:47 PM

http://upshizzle.com/pfiles/8473/1.jpg

jaguar604 04-10-2011 04:48 PM

3rd year in a row.

History comes in threes?

!Nhan 04-10-2011 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jigga250 (Post 7384315)
Hawks still have Toews, Kane, Hossa, Sharp, Keith, and Seabrook, and possibly a psychological edge over Luongo. Dallas has Morrow, Richards, Eriksson, and......Ribeiro? Its not even close IMO. Look at our games vs them this year and how tight all the Chicago games were, while the Dallas games were all basically borderline blowouts.

I'm sorry but if you think we can't handle the Hawks, what about the second round then when we get there? What if the team we go up against is the Ducks? Selanne, Ryan, Getzlaf, Perry, Visnovsky? Those guys are power houses. What about SJS? Thornton, Marleau, Heatly, Clowe, Pavelski, Boyle, Couture? What if come finals time we play against BOS or PHI? They're probably the deepest teams in the east. Gonna be scared of them as well?

punkwax 04-10-2011 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !Nhan (Post 7384280)
I said it once and I'll say it again, if we can't beat the Hawks we don't deserve the cup. I don't know what difference it makes if we play DAL or CHI. Sure we dominated them in the regular season, but playoffs is completely different hockey.

If you don't know what the difference is between CHI and DAL, then you don't know anything about hockey. That's just as dumb as your first sentence. I said it once and I'll say it again, if we can't beat ANY team, we don't deserve the cup.

Dal = less travel, easier team, more likely to be a shorter series which = less likelihood of injury which = playoff longevity.

It's not about being afraid of CHI (or ANY team for that matter). I'm 100% confident we'll beat them and shake the demons. The fact is, in every sport, every single athlete looks for some type of competitive edge. Read the above paragraph for a few examples of the competitive edge the Canucks would gain from playing Dal vs. Chi.

/rant

BRING ON THE HAWKS!

GO CANUCKS!!!!!

tonyzoomzoom 04-10-2011 04:51 PM

crawford (as in Marc the coach) got screwed by minny again lawlz

Sentinel 04-10-2011 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaguar604 (Post 7384326)
3rd year in a row.

History comes in threes?

Third time is the charm?

We better pwn the shit out of the Blackhawks. This dude at work is a Blackhawks fan, so freaking annoying... Pwn them so the guy can sthu.

Ch28 04-10-2011 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !Nhan (Post 7384327)
I'm sorry but if you think we can't handle the Hawks, what about the second round then when we get there? What if the team we go up against is the Ducks? Selanne, Ryan, Getzlaf, Perry, Visnovsky? Those guys are power houses. What about SJS? Thornton, Marleau, Heatly, Clowe, Pavelski, Boyle, Couture? What if come finals time we play against BOS or PHI? They're probably the deepest teams in the east. Gonna be scared of them as well?

I don't think it's a matter of being scared. It's just smarter to take on the weakest teams first to avoid injuries and to get some rest before the next round

LUUUUUUUU 04-10-2011 04:52 PM

PUMPED UP YET?

http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/con...d=35&id=107105

Harvey Specter 04-10-2011 04:53 PM

The Hawks don't scare me, the Ducks do. I'm glad we didn't have to face them but who knows we might have to face them in the 2nd round.

Tim Budong 04-10-2011 04:54 PM

Hawks, being dominant have a weak spot in the city...

http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2010/01/c...irtless-party/

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/7...eshirtless.jpg

murd0c 04-10-2011 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LUUUUUUUU (Post 7384338)

not one Canuck was in that

shawn79 04-10-2011 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaguar604 (Post 7384326)
3rd year in a row.

History comes in threes?

hey it worked for hossa

Ch28 04-10-2011 04:56 PM

It's a shame he couldn't snag better looking women considering all the money and fame he has.

!Nhan 04-10-2011 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nodnarb (Post 7384332)
If you don't know what the difference is between CHI and DAL, then you don't know anything about hockey. That's just as dumb as your first sentence. I said it once and I'll say it again, if we can't beat ANY team, we don't deserve the cup.

Dal = less travel, easier team, more likely to be a shorter series which = less likelihood of injury which = playoff longevity.

It's not about being afraid of CHI (or ANY team for that matter). I'm 100% confident we'll beat them and shake the demons. The fact is, in every sport, every single athlete looks for some type of competitive edge. Read the above paragraph for a few examples of the competitive edge the Canucks would gain from playing Dal vs. Chi.

/rant

BRING ON THE HAWKS!

GO CANUCKS!!!!!

Dallas is less travel than Chicago? I'm not saying you're wrong or right, but I thought CHI is closer. I agree and disagree with you. Yeah my first statement is pretty dumb as I look at it again, but you can't necessarily predict that DAL would be a shorter series vs playing CHI. Yes we did run them over in the regular season, but playoffs is different than regular season.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ch28 (Post 7384337)
I don't think it's a matter of being scared. It's just smarter to take on the weakest teams first to avoid injuries and to get some rest before the next round

I agree, but any team can be deemed a weaker team, but still push you to 7 games.

Hondaracer 04-10-2011 04:59 PM

it's not about "handling" anyone, it's about getting beat up through early rounds and not having enough to win a cup

if there's a path to the top of a mountain, you gonna take the smooth paved road or a road littered with boulders and obstacles?..

EmperorIS 04-10-2011 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sentinel (Post 7384321)
Could really use Malhotra this series...

http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/5916/img0079dx.jpg
:fuckyea:


yea if we still had Malhotra I would have alot more confident going in to this series

Ch28 04-10-2011 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !Nhan (Post 7384349)
I agree, but any team can be deemed a weaker team, but still push you to 7 games.

Obviously anything can happen in the playoffs but on paper and theoretically speaking, chicago has a stronger team compared to dallas

chicago: toews, kane, sharp, keith, seabrook, hossa
dallas: richards, eriksson, morrow/ribiero (if they even show up)

chicago has a strong 1st line and 1st pairing d
dallas has 2/3 of a good 1st line and no d or goaltending

i could care less which team we play because we've been great all season long but would i have preferred to play a weaker dallas team as opposed to chicago? fuck yeah.

Soundy 04-10-2011 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !Nhan (Post 7384280)
I said it once and I'll say it again, if we can't beat the Hawks we don't deserve the cup.

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/me...ainObvious.jpg

http://homework.never-ends.net/wp-co..._facepalm2.jpg

Saying it multiple times doesn't make it any less stupid.

LUUUUUUUU 04-10-2011 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by murd0c (Post 7384345)
not one Canuck was in that

k fine... :fullofwin:


spideyv2 04-10-2011 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darthchilli (Post 7384341)

...and they only cost 15 cents :troll:

Soundy 04-10-2011 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !Nhan (Post 7384349)
Dallas is less travel than Chicago? I'm not saying you're wrong or right, but I thought CHI is closer.

I'll say it: he's wrong.

Flight distance, Chicago is about 100 miles closer to us than Dallas. Time-wise, both are about a four-hour flight. With jetstreams, they might save a half-hour going to Chicago, and lose it again coming back... overall they average out the same.

shawn79 04-10-2011 05:05 PM

thats like saying if we dont beat any team we dont deserve the cup
:facepalm:

PornMaster 04-10-2011 05:11 PM

I don't think the hawks have a psych edge anymore since byfuckenugly is gone


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net