![]() |
|
In this case....GLK > X3 God damn the X3 is even worse now. |
^ imo q5 > GLK in terms of looks but the GLK performance is something to keep staring |
Quote:
|
so BMW never have plans to improve the interior/dash? those radio buttons look the same as 15 years ago... |
its got navi now! |
lolololol buying for the brand |
I kanna like it better then the previous generation |
yea i think it looks slightly better... but thats not saying much. |
i dont think its THAT bad.. the 5th picture looks really awkward though |
I don't think it looks that bad at all. Small SUV preference: GLK -> Q5 -> X3 |
meh i prefer the current x3 |
Q5 is the shiznit |
when i worked at bmw, the x3 was the biggest piece of shit on the lot. overpriced and drove like crap. +1 for buying for brand status. |
cocks buy for soley the reason of brand status |
The new X3 will have an M sport package option should look better with it. Left Lane has some photos. It will also sport the twin scroll N55 engine sub 6 sec 0-60. add a tune and you can easily shave another.5 off that. Not bad for a grocery getter. http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-x3-2011.html |
stilll the Q5 for me... the X3 ...welll never liked it then, defn dun like it now.. |
They need to make a Q5 with the 3.0T engine from the S4. My gawd that X3 looks hideous. |
X3 looks retarded. Never liked it. |
not an improvement at all. GLK is way better. |
for the market it is intended for (yuppies with kids +/- dog) -- they've done a good job with this vehicle. i think it looks good -- definitely looks like a bmw inside and out |
Looks better than the current X3... |
still a weak ass car |
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net