REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Technical Discussion > Manufacturer Tech Forums > Honda / Acura Tech Resources

Honda / Acura Tech Resources All honda & Acura Tech info
THIS ADSPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-27-2010, 11:47 PM   #1
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
hkRicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: richmond
Posts: 391
Thanked 140 Times in 34 Posts
Integra MPG vs Civic

So I'm looking at a 94 integra LS, with no vtec. How does the MPG compare to a 96 Civic CX (no vtec). I'm getting 550-600km+ easy per tank on my 96 cx. Is it same goes for the LS? I think LS non-vtec is 1.8L engine. Anyone know? thx.
Advertisement
hkRicer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 12:59 AM   #2
not the mod you're looking for
 
FN-2199's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,631
Thanked 1,466 Times in 514 Posts
^ I had the b18b engine (94 LS) in my del sol before. Even though it was burning oil, it still managed to get 40+kms per gallon.
I'd say that you'd hit a little less per tank than your CX. It shouldn't be anything to worry about though.
FN-2199 is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-28-2010, 07:32 AM   #3
RS controls my life!
 
Wetordry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 712
Thanked 41 Times in 31 Posts
Yes, you will notice a difference. The civic is about 24% more efficient.

31 mpg vs 25 mpg


http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/12609.shtml

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/10678.shtml
Wetordry is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-28-2010, 12:11 PM   #4
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
hkRicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: richmond
Posts: 391
Thanked 140 Times in 34 Posts
25% that's alot.... So i get 450ish km per tank? that's like S2000, RSX-S kinda mpg....
hkRicer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 11:57 PM   #5
JDMEK9Mod | DogWhisperer
 
spoon.ek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,563
Thanked 4,044 Times in 1,203 Posts
on the plus side you will have decent torque but if all you want is fuel efficiency stick with your civic
__________________
1998 Honda Civic EK9 - GQ || 1990 Honda Civic Si ED7 - DD || 1990 Honda Civic ED6 - RIP
VCC Buy/Sell rating 60-0-0 || RS Buy/Sell rating 20-0-0 || HT Buy/Sell rating 1-0-0
IG: @spoon.ek9
Spoiler!
spoon.ek9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 12:16 PM   #6
I don't get it
 
Toeknee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: richmond
Posts: 429
Thanked 262 Times in 50 Posts
civic engine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_D_engine#D16Y7

integra engine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_B_engine#B18B1

24% sounds about right considering how many more horses/torque and displacement you're getting

Last edited by Toeknee; 09-29-2010 at 12:31 PM.
Toeknee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 01:11 PM   #7
RS controls my life!
 
Wetordry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 712
Thanked 41 Times in 31 Posts
if you want a fuel efficient car in the same price range, go look for the 1992 honda civic VX

Rated at 43 MPG, which is about 39% more efficient than your current vehicle
Wetordry is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 01:16 PM   #8
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
hkRicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: richmond
Posts: 391
Thanked 140 Times in 34 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wetordry View Post
if you want a fuel efficient car in the same price range, go look for the 1992 honda civic VX

Rated at 43 MPG, which is about 39% more efficient than your current vehicle
Only if it comes with A/C, my gf say no no to no a/c.
hkRicer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 02:32 PM   #9
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Anjew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 914
Thanked 236 Times in 101 Posts
yea you gotta have A/C
Anjew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2010, 11:29 AM   #10
JDMEK9Mod | DogWhisperer
 
spoon.ek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,563
Thanked 4,044 Times in 1,203 Posts
i don't have a/c or p/s in either of my civics
__________________
1998 Honda Civic EK9 - GQ || 1990 Honda Civic Si ED7 - DD || 1990 Honda Civic ED6 - RIP
VCC Buy/Sell rating 60-0-0 || RS Buy/Sell rating 20-0-0 || HT Buy/Sell rating 1-0-0
IG: @spoon.ek9
Spoiler!
spoon.ek9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net