You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
Please for the love of god people read this. It is not so much engineering fail as it was as a result of building limitations since they had to construct on an existing structure, hence the cloth roof. Constructing a metal roof would've required building a entirely new stadium and hence more $$$$$. They just had to make the most cost effective decision and built on an existing structure.
Basically if a freak rainstorm just happens to down pour, it will just make the players wet. They just have to make sure and look at the weather conditions before they retract or open the roof. It really is a non-issue.
but the question still remains: why was a retractable roof necessary? what events could they NOT have held with a closed roof?
or is this an issue akin to choosing a convertible car because it's figuratively cooler?
or were there physical limitations for building a closed roof as well?
or is this an issue akin to choosing a convertible car because it's figuratively cooler?
Ding Ding Ding!
They had 1/2 a billion burning a hole in their pocket and had to spend it on something.
Funny, BC place can get a 500 million dollar roof but Victoria can't get 50 million to replace a nearly condemned rusting to shit 100 year old bridge that feeds into the downtown core. Fuck you very much BC Liberals!
I don't think this is a big deal personally. Like other cities with retractable roofs they plan ahead as well. Even the Mariners and Bluejays rarely run into a situation where they need to suddenly close the roof because they plan ahead and close it just in case anyways. Meh stupid media.
__________________
"back at the line to Babych.... LONG SHOT....Potvin had trouble with it....ADAM SHOOTS SCORES!!!!
because it's less expensive to build something from the ground up than Demolish an existing structure, engineer the new structure, and build ontop of a pre existing frame?
Cowboys stadium cost 1 billion btw, how old is Qwest field now? 10 years at least?
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
because it's less expensive to build something from the ground up than Demolish an existing structure, engineer the new structure, and build ontop of a pre existing frame?
Uhhh, they built Qwest Field over the old Kingdome.
For $500 million they could've built a goddamn 12 feet thick concrete blastproof roof that would retract in the middle of a fucking nuclear strike, let alone a rainy day.
__________________ Moderator Vancouver Automotive Chat | Vancouver Off-Topic
__________________
REVscene.net - Vancouver's #1 Automotive Forum and Classified's Site!
Interested in advertising with REVSCENE? Join our roster of Brian Jessel BMW, EBISU Robson, Blitz Gear, Soundworks, and dozens of the Lower Mainlands BUSIEST and most SUCCESSFUL small and medium businesses! Let us take you to the next level with our Incredibly affordable and effective packages Advertisement@revscene.net
Pretty sure the demolishion, cleanup, and rebuild of qwest totalled more than 500 Posted via RS Mobile
Even if demolition costs brought the total over 500mil, they got an entire NEW stadium. We're getting a fabric roof with a design flaw. We're getting a shitty deal.
One has to keep in mind that the Cowboys stadium is in the middle of no where while BC Place is in a prime location. I think that should be factored in a bit here personally. Would I have preferred tearing Bc Place down, playing at Empire for a couple few years instead? Sure, but this is what we got and I'm sure it will be dope.
__________________
"back at the line to Babych.... LONG SHOT....Potvin had trouble with it....ADAM SHOOTS SCORES!!!!
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 191
Thanked 280 Times in 50 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winson604
One has to keep in mind that the Cowboys stadium is in the middle of no where while BC Place is in a prime location. I think that should be factored in a bit here personally. Would I have preferred tearing Bc Place down, playing at Empire for a couple few years instead? Sure, but this is what we got and I'm sure it will be dope.
i think a majority of the public would have rather opted for a new stadium if cost was gonna be similar to a new roof... but im sure the fact that they wanted to host the 2011 grey cup here had something to do with a quick time frame for construction so they opted to go the current route.
im still puzzled as to why this whole "can only close at certain times" fiasco was not disclosed before any building permits were issued.
one of two things happened here...
whoever designed the roof knew and never said anything...
or
the government knew about it from the beginning but opted to go ahead with it and only disclose it to the public once construction was past the point of no return.
i find it ironic that construction is this far along and we were just told about it now.
The government probably opted for it because it was the cheaper option, and didnt know everyone would make big stink about it.
If you were to build a brand new stadium in the middle of downtown with todays pricing, I'm pretty sure it would be close to what the Dallas Cowboys paid.
i think a majority of the public would have rather opted for a new stadium if cost was gonna be similar to a new roof... but im sure the fact that they wanted to host the 2011 grey cup here had something to do with a quick time frame for construction so they opted to go the current route.
im still puzzled as to why this whole "can only close at certain times" fiasco was not disclosed before any building permits were issued.
one of two things happened here...
whoever designed the roof knew and never said anything...
or
the government knew about it from the beginning but opted to go ahead with it and only disclose it to the public once construction was past the point of no return.
i find it ironic that construction is this far along and we were just told about it now.
My point is I don't believe it would ha been close to the price of the new roof at all. Oh wells too late now =\
__________________
"back at the line to Babych.... LONG SHOT....Potvin had trouble with it....ADAM SHOOTS SCORES!!!!
If you were to build a brand new stadium in the middle of downtown with todays pricing, I'm pretty sure it would be close to what the Dallas Cowboys paid.
The land is already paid for. Also, Cowboy stadium seats 110,000 (Compared to the 55,000 of BC place). That's a huge a factor for how much that stadium cost. We couldn't possibly support a 110,000 seat stadium in Vancouver.
My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,810
Thanked 736 Times in 167 Posts
Failed 175 Times in 39 Posts
Lol I have to say... 1st two pages of this thread are a great example of people just going along in order to belong.
Page 1:
someone posts the news article stating the stadium has engineering problems.
The responses:
"OMG WTFBBQ LOL enginering FAIL FAIL FAIL bwahaha waste of money!!!"
---------------------------------
Page 2:
someone posts an article that says "this issue has been known for awhile" and someone says it's being blown out of proportion"
the responses now become:
"yea jeez! I don't know why everyone's complaining, this was a better decsion!! people stop blowing it out of proportion."
-----------------------------
Page 3:
beginning of some dialogue/debate instead of "he said, she said" crap.
----------------------------
stop jumping on the bandwagon and think for yourselves, you only look like an ass when you agree just to agree.
/end
edit: this is basically how the first 2 pages of the thread play out: