REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2010, 09:09 AM   #26
I don't like cheese but I love milk!
 
Ferra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Van
Posts: 1,980
Thanked 895 Times in 243 Posts
Failed 105 Times in 49 Posts
this happened probably because the guy is poor and just happened to get a shitty public lawyer representing him
Advertisement
Ferra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:22 AM   #27
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
jeffh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: kelowna
Posts: 4,797
Thanked 488 Times in 168 Posts
Failed 52 Times in 23 Posts
dude stabbed another dude, TO DEATH and didnt call emergency services asap?
murder

As soon as he got the knife away, he made a choice to kill to the other guy
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar View Post
Ugliness and fatness are genetic disorders, much like baldness or necrophilia, and it's only your fault if you don't hate yourself enough to do something about it.
jeffh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:29 AM   #28
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
Here's my take on the self defence one... The judge/jury involved was probably upset at Carol Berner's bare minimum sentence, so they decided to get back at her in their own way and give her son the most they were able to.

Personally, I honestly think it's a mixture of that plus some part of the story that the media hasn't really talked about yet.
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-04-2010, 10:44 AM   #29
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
jeffh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: kelowna
Posts: 4,797
Thanked 488 Times in 168 Posts
Failed 52 Times in 23 Posts
^ too bad part of jury selection is weeding out anyone who may know anything at all to do with that other case

the defense lawyer isnt going to let people with any sort of bias sit on the jury
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar View Post
Ugliness and fatness are genetic disorders, much like baldness or necrophilia, and it's only your fault if you don't hate yourself enough to do something about it.
jeffh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 10:48 AM   #30
Head Moderator
 
Lomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1982
Location: Great White Nor
Posts: 22,661
Thanked 6,462 Times in 2,081 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 51 Posts
Doesn't mean they didn't lie about their knowledge to get in.

Either way, unless there's more to the story than the media is letting on (and provided the defence story is actually true), then the sentence was definitely too harsh.
Lomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 11:02 AM   #31
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,688
Thanked 10,397 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffh View Post
^ too bad part of jury selection is weeding out anyone who may know anything at all to do with that other case

the defense lawyer isnt going to let people with any sort of bias sit on the jury
he was convicted in October depending on when trial started (likely months earlier) the Trial began in middle of Sept (but it was in voire dire meaning the jury wasn't sitting) however the jury was chosen already

given the length of time and how much his moms case was being talked about i find it hard to believe the Jury didn't know an inkling or at the very least learned more about it while sitting on her sons Trial

anyway u can read a far more detailed report about the events of the case here http://www.timescolonist.com/news/Jo...315/story.html

stabbed the deceased in the head after having him pinned down and taken the weapon, got rid of the knife, was stopped by police but didn't tell them about the dying/dead guy laying on the ground nearby + multiple witnesses attesting to his violent/abusive nature + the deceased is a father + the possibility of his mothers case influencing the jury
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 03:58 PM   #32
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Mancini's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,923
Thanked 304 Times in 155 Posts
Failed 116 Times in 29 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnomes View Post
I think out legal system needs a major overhaul. Too many outdated crap, defend rights of offender vs victim, etc
Yes, too many outdated crap.
Mancini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 03:26 PM   #33
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
.Dream.Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: van
Posts: 670
Thanked 50 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 29 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffh View Post
dude stabbed another dude, TO DEATH and didnt call emergency services asap?
murder

As soon as he got the knife away, he made a choice to kill to the other guy
ok so what would you do with the knife after you took it from him?

this guy is obviously out to kill you, you can't just throw the knife a few meters away and keep struggling with him, he's gonna pick it back up and stab you.

His buddy was also blacked out, not like he can just book it out of there, he's not going to leave his friend behind with some guy who just came at you with a knife.

In the heat of the moment you don't have time to think, maybe he didn't intend to kill him but you're going to need to stab him to disable him.

It's not like you can just call a time out, and tell him you don't want to play anymore after you get the knife. He's just gonna come at you until he gets the knife back
.Dream.Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 03:41 PM   #34
Big Drama Show
 
spideyv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,714
Thanked 3,080 Times in 1,195 Posts
Failed 410 Times in 209 Posts
no wonder the americans laugh at our justice system

some kid sucker punches my friend while we get off the bus, knocks him out and pulls a knife on us. i take the knife from him and stab him out of adrenaline and kill him then i would have to face a life sentencing? pfffffft..basically u have to let the other guy kill u?
spideyv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 12-05-2010, 03:51 PM   #35
is best wrench
 
monkeywrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,485
Thanked 1,208 Times in 272 Posts
Failed 190 Times in 33 Posts
Canadian justice system is full of horse shit. In a situation like that you basically have to be stabbed half way to hell if you hope to have a slight bit of justice served.
Posted via RS Mobile
monkeywrench is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 12-05-2010, 04:43 PM   #36
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanked 187 Times in 74 Posts
Failed 97 Times in 34 Posts
Sections 34 -37 of the criminal code of Canada deal with 'Defense of Person.'
http://www.efc.ca/pages/law/cc/cc.part-i.html

Quote:
34. (1) Every who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary to enable him to defend himself.

(2) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if

(a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension (anticipation/fear) of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes; and
(b) he believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm. [R.S. c.C-34, s.34.]
__________________
Surf, Party, Sleep.
m!chael is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-05-2010, 04:49 PM   #37
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,688
Thanked 10,397 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
omg i cant believe i thanked m!chael !!
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 04:56 PM   #38
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,074
Thanked 187 Times in 74 Posts
Failed 97 Times in 34 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by StylinRed View Post
omg i cant believe i thanked m!chael !!
You know what's even more fucked up, I just realized I know him, he's a friend of a friend
He was actually a really nice guy...
__________________
Surf, Party, Sleep.
m!chael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 09:05 PM   #39
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,457
Thanked 2,259 Times in 439 Posts
Failed 595 Times in 124 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by m!chael View Post
You know what's even more fucked up, I just realized I know him, he's a friend of a friend
He was actually a really nice guy...
you know the guy that got stabbed and is now dead or you know the guy who stabbed and killed the guy and is now facing the life sentence?
TheKingdom2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 06:24 AM   #40
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
I believe that the jury, who heard all the facts and evidence from both sides, have a better chance of making an informed decision. Reading a few lines of summary from a newspaper who makes their money from sensational reporting is hardly the best way to know exactly what happened. It appears that the jury believed that self defence was not appropriate and said so with their decision. To get upset about something while not knowing the facts of the matter makes you no better than Obama, if you remember what he did in the case of the Cop and Obama's professor buddy and the reported burglary in progress.

As a point of interest..
"B.C. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Ballance imposed the sentence just before noon Friday after hearing a joint submission by the Crown and defence asking for a parole ineligibility period of 10 years.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 08:48 PM   #41
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: here
Posts: 5,793
Thanked 146 Times in 67 Posts
Failed 208 Times in 42 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by m!chael View Post
Sections 34 -37 of the criminal code of Canada deal with 'Defense of Person.'
http://www.efc.ca/pages/law/cc/cc.part-i.html


34. (1) Every who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary to enable him to defend himself.

(2) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if

(a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension (anticipation/fear) of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes; and
(b) he believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm. [R.S. c.C-34, s.34.]

yes, section 2 states you can kill someone who attacks you with a weapon.
johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 06:27 AM   #42
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
hk20000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
hmmm I thought it'd be an open and shut case of self defense.

1. guy came at you with knife
2. you know at that time you are in life or death danger
3. you got knife from assailant
4. assailant continues to act hostile, having clear intention to take your life - I see that the plaintiff is saying that the knife is now not in his hands - but there are many ways to kill without a weapon at that range....
5. you stabbed the assailant on the basis of self defense.

I don't see any point where the accused (now) has been removed from danger of his life until he stabbed the original assailant....

I hope this shit don't fly in the court and the guy just come off clean man....otherwise it's some real fucked up shit.
__________________
⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed.

  • 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
  • 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
  • 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
  • 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
  • 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
hk20000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 07:27 AM   #43
RS Peace Officer
 
zulutango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
Read post # 40. The trial is over and the jury decided he was guilty.
zulutango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 08:01 AM   #44
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Gnomes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,360
Thanked 659 Times in 201 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 31 Posts
meh, those who brandish their knives around ready to kill should also be prepared to die. Live by sword, die by sword.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSALES View Post
While driving yesterday I saw a banana peel in the road and instinctively swerved to avoid it...thanks Mario Kart.
Gnomes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 08:55 AM   #45
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: fml
Posts: 109
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
fml

Last edited by danz; 06-27-2013 at 03:37 PM.
danz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 10:53 AM   #46
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
geeknerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,149
Thanked 457 Times in 190 Posts
Failed 397 Times in 91 Posts
at least we know that if u want to kill a guy, do it with a car and ull only get 5 years.
geeknerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 11:03 AM   #47
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,688
Thanked 10,397 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
the problem is there's no1 corroborating their self defense story

their story is sketchy in the least, this father (the deceased) just followed them off the bus for no apparent reason and was going to kill one/both of them

not only that according to his story he had the deceased pinned to the ground and weapon out of hand already (him "punching" with the knife sounds like they wanted to say he forgot the knife was in his hands but who the hell punches in a stabbing motion?)

not only that they got rid of the murder weapon (its not to be found anywhere)

not only that the police stopped them because neighbours called about people fighting and they didnt tell the officer/s that there was a guy with a knife wound in his head in the bushes who may or may not be dead

not only that he has a history of violence and crime (i dont know what the deceased has but this fact doesnt do well for the credibility of this guy and the likeliness that he was just defending himself)


you can see why the Jury convicted him; you can see why his defense lawyer was hoping for Manslaughter instead of an acquittal (he may still get it in an appeal all im saying is you can see why the Jury voted how they did)

Last edited by StylinRed; 12-07-2010 at 11:08 AM.
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 01:36 PM   #48
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
Phat_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 226
Thanked 191 Times in 41 Posts
Failed 71 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by StylinRed View Post
^^^ no if it was proven it was self defense he wouldn't have gotten convicted of murder the problem with this case (if all the information was provided to us in that news article is the jury)

he'll appeal and he'll likely get off or get manslaughter

the problem is we dont want people copping the "self defense" plea whenever they kill someone so its harder to get

However Look at the Father and Two brothers that killed a drug user/dealer (it sounds like it was NOT self defense, based on the news) they got off scott free on the self defense plea

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col...y-verdict.html
there's gotta be a reason he got 2nd degree and not manslaughter
leaving someone to bleed until dead is a good reason

that fucker in the Porsche should have got life though
__________________
2000 Acura Integra Type R #858 -- original owner
2012 Porsche 911 Turbo S
Phat_R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 05:27 PM   #49
Moderator
 
CanadaGoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: here & there
Posts: 4,654
Thanked 298 Times in 131 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnomes View Post
meh, those who brandish their knives around ready to kill should also be prepared to die. Live by sword, die by sword.
Almost no one who carries a knife is actually mentally prepared to go beyond just flicking it open, to taking it to gravest extreme and sticking that blade into another persons windpipe and feel it punch through like it was a piece of cardboard, push it deep into someones armpit, or otherwise stab and carve at someones body like it was a slab of meat. Causing superficial knife wounds, and actually using a couple inch long razor sharp piece of steel to disable someone who is hell bent on coming at you, are two totally different animals and most people never give that any thought till it's too late.
__________________
Moderator
Vancouver Automotive Chat | Vancouver Off-Topic
__________________

REVscene.net - Vancouver's #1 Automotive Forum and Classified's Site!

Interested in advertising with REVSCENE? Join our roster of Brian Jessel BMW, EBISU Robson, Blitz Gear, Soundworks, and dozens of the Lower Mainlands BUSIEST and most SUCCESSFUL small and medium businesses! Let us take you to the next level with our Incredibly affordable and effective packages Advertisement@revscene.net
CanadaGoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 11:20 PM   #50
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 113
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 60 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonjour43MA View Post
Our legal system is shit. Simple as that.

If someone pulled a knife on me and tried to kill me, am I supposed to stand there and let the person stab me til I'm dead? Hells no, you defend yourself anyway you can, and in this case, you try to disarm him by taking his knife away. I suppose where the guy did wrong was then using that knife against his attacker, instead of backing off to stablize the situation... We have this weird law where "force-for-force" has to be established, meaning, if I were to use a knife on my attacker, he would also have to have a knife at the same time as well, otherwise I'd be charged for using unnecessary lethal force.

It is definitely wrong to kill someone, but if this was in the US I wonder what the outcome would've been like - they're certainly more lenient on the right to defend yourself when faced with peril.

Ironic how his mom was also sentenced recently for killing 2 people with her car while driving intoxicated... instant karma these days eh? Crazy.
LIKE!!
milkmilk101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net