belka | 12-11-2016 05:51 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by godwin
(Post 8809060)
I don't think US or Australia have mothballed any of their Super Hornets. The Marines had to pull some of their old Hornets.. so the US fighter gap is real.
Boeing has to get authorization from Congress to export to Canada. Also Canada traditionally want their own configurations..
F35 is too compromised for Canada's size.. single engine especially a high performance and rather temperamental one is bad news for Arctic patrol.
However politically Canada has to dance some tricky dance to get around the F35 offset.. hence they are insisting it is an "interim" solution. | There is no such thing as "Arctic patrol". It is incredibly expensive to fly up north for extended periods of time, that is why you only see one or two excerises a year.
The F135 engine is exceeding 90% reliability which is well beyond 2020 targets. This is the most advanced jet engine ever built that is designed for every scenario. There is no such thing as 100% reliability and flying jets has its own risks regardless of number of engines. The US, Norway and Denmark all will be flying their F35s in Arctic environments. We are nothing special when it comes to risks. |