REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Entertainment Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/entertainment-forum_27/)
-   -   The Dark Knight Rises (https://www.revscene.net/forums/635565-dark-knight-rises.html)

TouringTeg 07-25-2012 08:48 AM

Saw it in Imax last night. Awesome movie.

Definitely slow at times and long but very entertaining and would see again.

MMM hathaway in the cat woman outfit

Expresso 07-25-2012 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenZa (Post 7985147)
How about a separate spoilers/discussion thread?

I haven't watched it yet, just wondering if it's worth it to go watch IMAX?

Yes, pretty much every fight sequence and city skyline scene is shot in IMAX. Read its over an hour of footage.

kwy 07-25-2012 10:25 AM

There's something like 70 minutes of imax footage.

SkinnyPupp 07-25-2012 11:15 AM

But only worth it if you watch in a real Imax theatre. That means Langley or Richmond ONLY.

fsy82 07-25-2012 12:14 PM

wow the movie has grossed in 5 days almost as much as the spiderman movie has done in 23 days

The Numbers - Daily Box Office Chart for Tuesday July 24th, 2012

twitchyzero 07-25-2012 12:37 PM

the numbers are meh
even with the shooting incident the opening weekend only had $2M over TDK's opening weekend.

Even with the avengers being 3D (thus higher ticket prices) I would expect TDKR to be closer to $180M...beating the final Harry Potter movie

sas 07-25-2012 07:45 PM

Wow, great movie. I don't know why some viewers were expecting crazy plot twists/mind-fucks.. Is this a pre-requisite for a good movie?

I typically never head out to the theatres but glad I did. I was thoroughly entertained for the entire 2.5hrs. IMAX was amazing -much prefer this visual experience over 3D. What a trilogy.

One question: I didn't stay past the credits.. Did I miss anything?

SkinnyPupp 07-25-2012 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 7985284)
But only worth it if you watch in a real Imax theatre. That means Coquitlam or Richmond ONLY.

What's with the fail twitchy zero?

murd0c 07-25-2012 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 7985712)
What's with the fail twitchy zero?

A lot of the theatres have received upgraded screens and projectors and those who have IMAX's are true and same with the AVX theatres

kwy 07-25-2012 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sas (Post 7985665)
Wow, great movie. I don't know why some viewers were expecting crazy plot twists/mind-fucks.. Is this a pre-requisite for a good movie?

I typically never head out to the theatres but glad I did. I was thoroughly entertained for the entire 2.5hrs. IMAX was amazing -much prefer this visual experience over 3D. What a trilogy.

One question: I didn't stay past the credits.. Did I miss anything?

This was the conclusion. It wouldn't make any sense to have a post credits scene. And no.

iwantaskyline 07-25-2012 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 7985712)
What's with the fail twitchy zero?

There's also Colossus that has a "true" IMAX theatre.

SkinnyPupp 07-25-2012 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by murd0c (Post 7985717)
A lot of the theatres have received upgraded screens and projectors and those who have IMAX's are true and same with the AVX theatres

When talking about Imax, there is only one true way to watch it, and that is 70mm film projectors.

"upgraded" digital projectors are not true Imax. Here's a comparison:

http://i.imgur.com/Hb5rf.jpg

Only two of the Imax theatres in BC will look like the screen on the right: Richmond and Langley (Collosus, I thought it was Cocquitlam, fixed typo). The rest will look like theone on the left. Basically it's bigger than a normal theatre screen, but not Imax. It doesn't have the verticality that immerses you into the movie. Like, the whole fucking point of Imax.

LiquidTurbo 07-25-2012 10:19 PM

Watched in IMAX, not that worth it imo. The imax scenes are weird becuase they're 4:3 aspect ratio.

IMO, the real benefit of IMAX is the upgraded sound.

rice cooker 07-25-2012 11:28 PM

ya i dont get the 4:3 ratio either. tv screens went from square to widescreen. movie screens are going the other way?

SkinnyPupp 07-25-2012 11:29 PM

People who "don't get" 4:3 in imax = :fulloffuck:

BaoTurbo 07-25-2012 11:59 PM

Movie wasn't too bad. Gf said it was bad because she expected something more like The Dark Knight with the Joker. Good ending though I really liked the ending because it could mean the movie is going to have a sequel

9/10

Culture_Vulture 07-26-2012 12:01 AM

I loved it. 10/10. Girlfriend thought Batman/Bruce Wayne did jack shit, but I didn't take it to be a major issue; anybody else feel this way?

dlo 07-26-2012 12:39 AM

Spoiler!

twitchyzero 07-26-2012 12:41 AM

sorry it wasn't a fair fail..you dont live in canada no more
and was gonna do it when you gave joseph gordon-levitt some funky name few pages back
at least you didn't confuse chris hansen for rick hansen haha

yogenfruz 07-26-2012 01:22 AM

Just got back from it, and, I'm sure I'm going to get hated on for this, but I liked it more than TDK. Here's why:
I tend to write a lot when I get into something, prep for a bit more reading than some other posts.

First off, I felt that TDK was too over-hyped for me at the time. And upon seeing it, I was expecting more from Heath Ledger. In no way am I saying he was bad, or even mediocre; he redefined what people believed to be the Joker. He no longer was a cartoonish clown, who used gags and jokes as a form of destruction; he became a monster, one who clearly wanted the world to burn as he watched, not from atop a pedestal, but from an equal standing as everyone around him, so that he could see and feel what he caused. Nolan clearly created something amazing with TDK, and everyone in the film was outstanding. However, these reasons are from TDKR, so they're spoilered.

Spoiler!


Overall, because I've always loved Batman as well as Nolan's take on the franchise, I give it a 10. I hope that if Batman is taken under someone else's name, they take a page out of Nolan's book on how to make movies that keep you coming back for more.

SkinnyPupp 07-26-2012 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twitchyzero (Post 7985952)
sorry it wasn't a fair fail..you dont live in canada no more
and was gonna do it when you gave joseph gordon-levitt some funky name few pages back
at least you didn't confuse chris hansen for rick hansen haha

What does living in Canada have to do with anything? Are you saying there are more 70mm Imax film locations in BC? Because there aren't, at least according to the official Dark Knight Rises website. Or was it because I made the typo, and called Colossus Coquitlam? Yeah, my bad :okay:

As for the actor, maybe I got the names in the wrong order, I don't know. I can't be bothered to remember when actors have 3 names, 2 of which can be first or last names. Fucking child actors of the 90's, if you're going to become an actual star, fix your name :rukidding:

dlo 07-26-2012 01:24 AM

On the same boat as you, TKDR was better than TKD

StylinRed 07-26-2012 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBPTL6o4 (Post 7985951)
I was more disappointed
Spoiler!
lol

is that what happened?
still havent seen it so fuck you for spoiling




Rises made 2million more opening weekend but it was also playing in more theatres than TDK

and TDK has made $10mn more in 6 days than Rises did http://www.boxofficemojo.com/ (its on the front page)

I think the bad user reviews are affecting it Im hearing a lot of people saying it sucks :/

kwy 07-26-2012 09:48 AM

Whoever says it sucks is a fucking idiot.

JKam 07-26-2012 10:20 AM

Whoever said TDKR sucks didn't know Batman Begins was the first of the trilogy.

TDKR ends the trilogy in the same style it began.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net