You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
If you don't like it, LET THEM KNOW. I did... told them it should at least be made optional. Said it's *kinda* neat on my desktop, but it really messes things up on my netbook's tiny screen.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
If you don't like it, LET THEM KNOW. I did... told them it should at least be made optional. Said it's *kinda* neat on my desktop, but it really messes things up on my netbook's tiny screen.
dude my thoughts exactly, my stupid 1024x600 resolution drives me insane.
"It's called Sex Panther by Odeon. It's illegal in nine countries... Yep, it's made with bits of real panther, so you know it's good ... They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time. "
I can't believe people are against the new photo display script... it's better in every single way.. wtf?
Not really, why do I need to block the rest of the screen to look at a single photo? Am I not capable of looking at the photo and everything else on the screen?
I can't believe people are against the new photo display script... it's better in every single way.. wtf?
- Can't right-click/Copy URL or Save as...
- Have to close it before you can click anything else (Notifications/Home/Profile/etc.)
- Too big for my netbook screen
- Has no real benefit other than putting a pretty(?) frame around the pictures
In what ways is it better? Do be specific than "every way."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Not really, why do I need to block the rest of the screen to look at a single photo? Am I not capable of looking at the photo and everything else on the screen?
I just find it more convenient.. Looking at my wall, I'll see a photo thumb I might want to check out. So now I just click on it, and a window pops up temporarily, and I can scroll through the album or close it. Before, you'd have to either open a new tab for it, or have it take over your entire current window, having to either scroll back through all the pictures you've seen, or start all over again at the Facebook home page...
Basically it has nothing but positives, I don't understand the backlash other than "it's not what we're used to and that's bad". Which seems to be what happens every time they improve Facebook...
I just find it more convenient.. Looking at my wall, I'll see a photo thumb I might want to check out. So now I just click on it, and a window pops up temporarily, and I can scroll through the album or close it. Before, you'd have to either open a new tab for it, or have it take over your entire current window, having to either scroll back through all the pictures you've seen, or start all over again at the Facebook home page...
Basically it has nothing but positives, I don't understand the backlash other than "it's not what we're used to and that's bad". Which seems to be what happens every time they improve Facebook...
I think it might just be my screen (13") but liking and comment viewing was difficult for me with the theatre display
I just find it more convenient.. Looking at my wall, I'll see a photo thumb I might want to check out. So now I just click on it, and a window pops up temporarily, and I can scroll through the album or close it. Before, you'd have to either open a new tab for it, or have it take over your entire current window, having to either scroll back through all the pictures you've seen, or start all over again at the Facebook home page...
Basically it has nothing but positives, I don't understand the backlash other than "it's not what we're used to and that's bad". Which seems to be what happens every time they improve Facebook...
yeah i agree.. the only disadvantage of it is no saving photos and copy image url etc.
i love how when someone comments on a photo, i just click the notification and when im done viewing the comments, i click outside of the small blackbox window thing and continue where i was before i got the notification.
the only reason why i disabled it right now is just for the saving pics and copy image url :/
I just find it more convenient.. Looking at my wall, I'll see a photo thumb I might want to check out. So now I just click on it, and a window pops up temporarily, and I can scroll through the album or close it.
This is better. No clicking, no page changing, auto-sizing to your screen.
Edit: additional bonus: you can turn it on and off with a single click, a courtesy not afforded by the FB black frame.
Quote:
Basically it has nothing but positives, I don't understand the backlash other than "it's not what we're used to and that's bad". Which seems to be what happens every time they improve Facebook...
Did you READ my post? Three negatives right there.
They could at least make it optional, because it's a major PITA on my netbook.
We're all very happy it works nicely for you on your 36" screen and blazingly-fast 16-core, 48GB RAM machine. It's doesn't work so well for everyone.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Look, all I said was that I didn't understand the resistance to this. For all the negatives I've seen, there has been a simple solution. If you don't agree, fine. If you have a small screen, I can see it being a problem. But then if your screen is that small, I'm sure facebook isn't the only site you have problems with.
CTRL+R gets rid of the black frame!!! but not permanently, just for the one time you are on FB.
__________________
"As Sir Francis Bacon once said, 'There is no beauty which hath not some strangeness about its proportions'.
And he's right, who ever he is. I mean, look at Keira Knightley.
She's just an ironing board with a face. And she works." - JC on the Alfa 8C
Look, all I said was that I didn't understand the resistance to this.
You were give numerous reasons why different people don't like it. What's with the dismissiveness? "It works fine for me and I like it, so any who doesn't must be stupid."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
I didn't say anything about anyone who disagrees with me. I just said I don't see their point. All the "reasons" given, I have counterpoints for all those arguments. So I still don't get it, sorry.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
Use the "Download" link, noob.
