| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
03-31-2011, 01:15 AM
|
#26 | | G'd up! w000weee
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,140
Thanked 225 Times in 84 Posts
|
infiniti needs to make the g37 less of a tank...it's so big and sluggish compared to the other 2 (haven't driven either rs or m versions, but i assume they r better than the current haha)
| 
|  | |
03-31-2011, 01:28 AM
|
#27 | | is best wrench
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,485
Thanked 1,208 Times in 272 Posts
|
I saw a black IPL G37 just a few days ago, and I admit it looks decent, but being so heavy and sluggish compared to the TT-RS and 1M, it's pretty much in the different league.
The TT-RS packs quite alot of power for a small car, but the 1M is pretty much the same in terms of weight.
I'm looking forward to seeing the TT-RS land here soon and hopefully a revised RS4 when they ditch the current body style
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 02:36 AM
|
#28 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: BY
Posts: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
fucking sick...
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 07:17 AM
|
#29 | | Everyone wants a piece of R S...
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 390
Thanked 545 Times in 74 Posts
|
Here we go...is this the right car? I don't know my audis. EDIT: I just re-read these specs are for the manual version. Can't find anything for the 7speed auto...hmmmm...really that big of difference?
Quote from audi website:
"The TT RS rockets from 0 to 62 mph in 4.6 seconds. The governed top speed of 155 mph is merely the official figure; as an option, it can be increased to 174 mph. Peak torque of 332 lb-ft is available between 1,600 and 5,300 rpm, providing tremendous pulling power. The TT RS Coupe requires only 9.2 liters of fuel per 25.57 US mpg – another example of how Audi combines dynamics and efficiency." http://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/e...container=page
Last edited by vo_hantu; 03-31-2011 at 07:24 AM.
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 07:49 AM
|
#30 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Burnaby,BC
Posts: 2,053
Thanked 1,185 Times in 304 Posts
|
lol $66k for an RS Audi is cheap compared to costs of other RS cars in the line up. RS4's were $100k and sold very well. I think people that are spending more than $50k on a car will not get scared away by a 16k price difference in order to get a lot more car for their money
__________________
Fast, Reliable, Cheap
A car can be only 2 out of the 3.
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 02:55 PM
|
#31 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: rawr
Posts: 927
Thanked 1,324 Times in 249 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by clintonpoon88  you cant get an m3 coupe for 66G's
they start at 71000 before options, taxes and freight | C/D numbers are in US... An M3 coupe in the states retail for $58,900 MSRP. So yes, an M3 coupe w/ competition pkg is less than 66gs.
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 04:32 PM
|
#32 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,032
Thanked 2,165 Times in 594 Posts
|
soon as i saw the thread title, asked myself WTF is the IPL G37 doing in there, things gonna get killed!
great looking car aesthetically speaking, (minus the 4x4 ride height) but overall the thing sucks, they should keep it for what it really is, a luxury coupe with a dash of sport... and nowhere near worth the price... like 50+ grand for a tiny bit more hp over the normal coupe, power you won't even really feel, oh and a sport kit and wheels.... oh and it's fckin 4x4 status thing sits so high... even the infiniti guys me included are disappointed in it overall..
give me a base model g37 coupe, and i will make it faster and better looking than this thing while keeping the price under 50k overall
__________________
(oO:::\___/:::Oo) (DPE-wheels) // Satin Cocaine White
Last edited by G-spec; 03-31-2011 at 04:59 PM.
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 04:48 PM
|
#33 | | no
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: home
Posts: 5,372
Thanked 6,058 Times in 1,222 Posts
|
^yeap.. i think the rear bumper of the IPL g37 looks fugly.....gives impression that it's trying way too hard to compete with the m1 and the tt-rs by addition of sport enhancement that doesnt flow well together....
the original g37 rear in the other hand, nice subtle and classy
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 05:08 PM
|
#34 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: North Shore
Posts: 2,279
Thanked 58 Times in 17 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by vo_hantu Here we go...is this the right car? I don't know my audis. EDIT: I just re-read these specs are for the manual version. Can't find anything for the 7speed auto...hmmmm...really that big of difference?
Quote from audi website:
"The TT RS rockets from 0 to 62 mph in 4.6 seconds. The governed top speed of 155 mph is merely the official figure; as an option, it can be increased to 174 mph. Peak torque of 332 lb-ft is available between 1,600 and 5,300 rpm, providing tremendous pulling power. The TT RS Coupe requires only 9.2 liters of fuel per 25.57 US mpg – another example of how Audi combines dynamics and efficiency." http://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/e...container=page | The DSG definitely shifts faster than most humans can shift so that automatically takes a couple tenths of seconds off the 0-60 time. It also has an extra gear (7 spd vs 6 spd) and it looks like it's geared pretty low and reaches 60 exactly at the top of 2nd. The addition of the "sport" exhaust may add a bit of power as these engines seem to be both underrated as well as easy to mod for more power. Finally, there's the launch control which allows easy and repeatable optimal launches and all those changes add up.
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 07:40 PM
|
#35 | | Resident Bullshitter
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
|
no fucking way it can do 0-60 in 3.6s
my friend owns one and its around the same as a light tuned E46 M3
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 07:40 PM
|
#36 | | Resident Bullshitter
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by too_slow BTW, here's a test mule of an Avant with the TT-RS drivetrain (rumored to be the new RS4)  | RS4 will be a V8
the RS3 used the TT-RS drivetrain  | |
| | |
03-31-2011, 08:26 PM
|
#37 | | Who's naughty? I___i
Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: GVR
Posts: 805
Thanked 173 Times in 73 Posts
| | |
| | |
03-31-2011, 09:29 PM
|
#38 | | Need my Daily Fix of RS
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: van
Posts: 281
Thanked 256 Times in 65 Posts
|
whoa 3.6 0-60. That's ridiculous for the TT. If only it came with a manual gearbox since every manual Audi I've driven had AMAZING gearboxes.
| |
| | |
03-31-2011, 11:34 PM
|
#39 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: rawr
Posts: 927
Thanked 1,324 Times in 249 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport no fucking way it can do 0-60 in 3.6s
my friend owns one and its around the same as a light tuned E46 M3 | i thought you owned 5 of these
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
