This is random and off topic but if I don't ask it here I don't know where else I can ask this unless I post in the fashions thread. What was the fat dude in part 2 last scene of them playing pool wearing? A bape camo dress shirt I am assuming? It is damn nice and I wanna know what the name of it is and if I can still buy it. And what was his name?
Posted via RS Mobile

you guys should check www.terf.ca thats where they review all the prostitute and massage parlor in vancouver.

paying for sex isnt horrible by any means. When you have a girlfriend for a long time you want to experience something different and the best way is escorts. To me escorts are just a fuck nothing more. You go in and get out , no strings attached. Girl doesnt need to find out and both sides are still happy.

But that doesn't really show the true meaning for what sex is.:megusta:

ppl call escorts cause their penis does the talking, not their brains

Random question a friend asked me before: Would it be fucking weird if a dude didn't have a gf, but he wanted to "get better" @ sex and thus end up getting escorts?

He doesn't have access to any fuck buddies? escorts/hookers/paid sex should be the absolute last option.

whores are lower than escorts.

At least escorts ask for money after ur done, whores are free.

Yeah I was like dude get a fleshlight or something.

I'm sure by whores you mean sluts, but I'm not arguing about semantics here; but just because a girl is promiscous doesn't mean she's any less of a person.

Don't let society's prudish values and ass backwards sexually conservative mind allow you to devalue women and stunt their freedom of sexuality.





(shit... did i just sound like a feminist?)

sounds crazy

.

depends on who's doing the judging.

Everyone judges when it comes to sluts lol

Nope. not everyone.

In my observation, the guys who don't judge women in this manner, are the guys who's also been around the block, and had more than their fair share of women (and even the share of others).

More over in my observation, the guys who don't judge, are also the guys who can, and have the same wild and crazy experiences that said women also have had.



TBH, women are just as sexually charged and adventurous as each and every male in this world. It's we (or in my case, you guys) as a society that just tells them "it's not okay."

Seriously slut is nothing more than just a hate word we like to paint on people for having wayyy too much more fun than we have.

those are called FASTFOOD or DriveThru.

i like dining in restaurants.

Keep telling yourself that champ. But I doubt any "average joe" can pull of 3somes like "other" people can when most guys are just struggling to get laid by 1 girl alone without having to mortgage a shitload of time, emotional investment and promises; or get laid by a different girl every week.

So you're "fine dining" analogy is moot when you can't deny that acts of those calibre are the pinnacle of man's sexual adventure. Nobody watches sensual soft porn for a reason. So still "slut" is just nothing more than a hate word by those who can't have as much to those who are, have, and still has the availability to have that kind of fun.

Besides, people keep thinking sluts are easy. They're not. They're only easy to "hot" (or other forms "desireability") guys. So the average Joe, let alone to the populi of RS, shouldn't be one to talk too fast.


So the point is still the same:

1. The people who do the "judging" are the people who can't manage to get "in the circle"
2. and because they can't get "in the circle," they deprave such people by labelling such acts as social taboo. (when in all honesty, they would like nothing more than to have the "natural" eligibility to welcomed in such circles.)



So fine dining :lol. What's next. and the "lock and key" analogy?