Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
04-11-2011, 12:31 AM
|
#1 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
| Prime!
Sold all my 2.8L's the past week and switched to all primes.... I thought I'd never do it but DAYAAAMMM I don't think i'll ever go back to zooms! The sharpness is just INSANE. It's 1 thing when you see the comparison on some black and white lines, it's another when you see the difference on human skin!
picked up a 35 1.4L II (crazy sharp!), 50 1.4, 85 1.8 this week. Next up is a 24 1.4L II and still deciding if i really need a 85 1.2L. I'm not too fond of the 50 1.2L though.
anyone else shooting all primes? I think the versatility tradeoff is well worth the quality.
__________________
yolo | 
|  | |
04-11-2011, 05:05 AM
|
#2 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,814
Thanked 6,553 Times in 1,155 Posts
|
I think Tom is pretty much shooting all primes too now
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 06:15 AM
|
#3 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,603
Thanked 2,752 Times in 1,182 Posts
|
There's a 35L MKII?!?! 
I got rid of my 24-70mm AFS in favor or 35G+85mm Sigma combo. IMO, after a while of using primes, you get used to move yourself around to get the composition you want. Making zooms useless.
And one reason I decided to go all prime is that, you can always change composition by moving, but the ability to go from F2.8-->F1.4 when I need it is priceless.
__________________
Nothing for now
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 08:51 AM
|
#4 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Rmd, BC
Posts: 9,951
Thanked 378 Times in 66 Posts
|
I'm moving in that direction too. Getting a Sigma 85 1.8 in May
Probably sell off my 17-40L and 70-200L soon.
__________________ All hail 2.3 turbo
RIP: long live 1.6
-Former S.O.M.O. Vive la resistance!
-MFC Fan # 3
-RS ELITE NINJA smurf-ninja
-L.B.C.: REVscene's Resident Lowballers
-RS Photography Crew WpnOfChoice: Sony DSC-F717~"Dana" http://www.flickr.com/duckducksnap | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 08:54 AM
|
#5 | | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
|
same thought too!
thinking of getting rid of my 24-70L for either a 24L or 35L
currently, i shoot a lot with just the 50 1.4F and 100 2.8F macro
levitron, do u mean sigma 85 1.4? looks like a beast!
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 09:15 AM
|
#6 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,814
Thanked 6,553 Times in 1,155 Posts
|
so now you guys got me thinking, right now I'm close to selling my 90mm f/2.8 macro. I'm wondering wether to keep it instead and sell my 18-50 f/2.8 and just shoot with my 50 f/1.8 and the 90mm macro. for the wide end I have my 10-20 still. What do you guys think?
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 10:17 AM
|
#7 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Matsuda  so now you guys got me thinking, right now I'm close to selling my 90mm f/2.8 macro. I'm wondering wether to keep it instead and sell my 18-50 f/2.8 and just shoot with my 50 f/1.8 and the 90mm macro. for the wide end I have my 10-20 still. What do you guys think? | Sell the macro! I was looking to buy one!!!
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 10:40 AM
|
#8 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,814
Thanked 6,553 Times in 1,155 Posts
|
gars, you're not help lol
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 02:11 PM
|
#9 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
|
Hehe: ya, custom made one of a kind  typo, I was thinking if the 24.
I had the 50 1.8 but hated the toy feel and super loud motor. I even find the 1.4 loud and poor quality. I was considering the sigma 50 1.4 too but the canon is far superior in sharpness at F5.6 + which is what I use 90% of the time Posted via RS Mobile
Last edited by J____; 04-11-2011 at 03:12 PM.
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 02:14 PM
|
#10 | | Da Vinci's real masterpiece: The Mona Diesel
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,797
Thanked 563 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ Hehe: ya, custom made one of a kind typo, I was thinking if the 24.
I had the 50 1.8 but hated the toy feel and super loud motor. I even find the 1.4 loud and poor quality. I was considering the sigma 50 1.4 too but the canon is fast superior in sharpness at F5.6 + which is what I use 90% of the time Posted via RS Mobile | Yeah looking for decent alternative to for a 50. It just that the L is crazy expensive.
What sucks is that I have cropped sensor so I have been looking for a decent 35 prime. Any suggestions?
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 02:57 PM
|
#11 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
|
I only have one prime and its not quite as fast as your F1.4's, but it is quite sharp! The Canon 500mm F4L IS.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 03:01 PM
|
#12 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,814
Thanked 6,553 Times in 1,155 Posts
|
I'm the only Nikon user  | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 03:13 PM
|
#13 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jsunu Yeah looking for decent alternative to for a 50. It just that the L is crazy expensive.
What sucks is that I have cropped sensor so I have been looking for a decent 35 prime. Any suggestions? | canon 35mm 1.4L. it's Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 03:25 PM
|
#14 | | Da Vinci's real masterpiece: The Mona Diesel
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,797
Thanked 563 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ | How much did you get it for?
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 05:17 PM
|
#15 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
|
I traded my 24-70 as a straight trade. But i think they're going for around $1200-1300 used.
__________________
yolo | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 05:40 PM
|
#16 | | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
|
there's a 35L on bccamera.com/forum for sale around 1300 i believe, and is looking for trades for 24-70 too. i want to pull the trigger on a trade but i have a ton of 77mm filters...sigh  http://bccamera.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5400
Last edited by moky; 04-11-2011 at 05:58 PM.
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 05:50 PM
|
#17 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,138
Thanked 1,323 Times in 579 Posts
|
I've been debating on getting a 24-70 2.8, but can't justify dropping $1800 on it.
Going to get an 85 1.8, since that's always been a lens on my list for awhile as well.
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 06:35 PM
|
#18 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
|
Nikon Primes, anyone?
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 07:19 PM
|
#19 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Euro7r I've been debating on getting a 24-70 2.8, but can't justify dropping $1800 on it.
Going to get an 85 1.8, since that's always been a lens on my list for awhile as well. | get it used for $1000...
or wait for the new one coming out shortly
__________________
yolo | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 07:27 PM
|
#20 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
|
here's a great site to compare lenses. If you think the differences are significant on some lines, wait till you actually compare the photos you take http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...mp=0&APIComp=0
__________________
yolo | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 07:45 PM
|
#21 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,138
Thanked 1,323 Times in 579 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ get it used for $1000...
or wait for the new one coming out shortly | Haven't seen many locally being sold, yet alone $1000 
There's a new 24-70 2.8 coming out?
| |
| | |
04-11-2011, 08:34 PM
|
#22 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Euro7r Haven't seen many locally being sold, yet alone $1000
There's a new 24-70 2.8 coming out? | no official news of it but it's certainly overdue..
__________________
yolo | |
| | |
04-11-2011, 11:20 PM
|
#23 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
|
Yeah, I've been shooting more primes during weddings. My weapons of choice are the 24mm TS-E, 35L, 50L, 85L, 135L & a Nikon 85mm PC-E Micro Nikkor with an adapter. The only zoom I use is the 70-200mm f2.8. The 135L has problems focusing in moderately low contrast situations even when paired to a 1DmkIV which was surprising. I'm generally not happy with the 85L, especially after using the new Nikon 85mm f1.4G, but most people won't notice how crappy it actually is. The 35L is nice it's what I use the most during the "getting ready" shots, but the new Nikon 35mm f1.4G has much smoother bokeh. The 50L has focus breathing issues which can be bothersome when shooting video. The 24L & 24mm TS-E lenses are amazing no criticism here, although I haven't tested the new Nikon 24mm f1.4G yet.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
04-12-2011, 06:51 AM
|
#24 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Rmd, BC
Posts: 9,951
Thanked 378 Times in 66 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by moky same thought too!
thinking of getting rid of my 24-70L for either a 24L or 35L
currently, i shoot a lot with just the 50 1.4F and 100 2.8F macro
levitron, do u mean sigma 85 1.4? looks like a beast! | Yeah, 85 1.4!
__________________ All hail 2.3 turbo
RIP: long live 1.6
-Former S.O.M.O. Vive la resistance!
-MFC Fan # 3
-RS ELITE NINJA smurf-ninja
-L.B.C.: REVscene's Resident Lowballers
-RS Photography Crew WpnOfChoice: Sony DSC-F717~"Dana" http://www.flickr.com/duckducksnap | |
| | |
04-12-2011, 07:45 AM
|
#25 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
|
Haha I just got the sigma 50 1.4 and damn it's all I shoot with these days, haven't touched my 10-20 or 17-70 in a long time.
Does this mean I should save my money and not bother going full frame? | |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
