| Soundy | 09-28-2012 08:56 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by MindBomber
(Post 8041781)
Why?
For the average commuter, the fuel savings place toll fees almost at par and the significant time savings are an added benefit. For businesses that require employees to travel the major routes on company time, the time savings add up to significant labour cost reduction. I say bring on the tolls, it makes complete sense to me. | Commuting from Pitt Meadows to Langley used to take my wife over an hour each way via the Port Mann, and burn 1/4 tank of gas per day to go a mere 35km each way. Taking the Golden Ears, it's 20 minutes and a little over a 1/4 tank per week for 16km each way.
If you figure a 50l tank and $1.30/l, that's $16.25 per day, or over $80/week in gas alone going the long way around... vs. the GEB at under $20/week for gas and $28.50 in tolls... nevermind getting home at 5pm rather than closer to 6, and being able to sleep in an extra hour in the morning.
For me, at $27/hr., if the toll bridge saves me 7 minutes on travel time, it's saved the company money. Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_chin
(Post 8041833)
Am I the only one that thinks that tolling is ridiculous? They use our tax money to build it and now we gotta pay to use it. :fulloffuck: | If they built it with tax money, they wouldn't need tolls. :fulloffuck: :fulloffuck: Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseBlue
(Post 8041869)
issues i have with tolling is that the money never goes to the right place....you think it'll be used for infrastructure or health? or do you think it will be used for executive pay raise? | The tolls aren't collected the same as taxes though. Depending on the bridge, they're collected by the company operating it and put towards maintenance, and paying off the construction on a set schedule. They don't get "laundered" through gov't coffers first. |