![]() | |
Amazing reno... https://cdnparap130.paragonrels.com/.../262790586.JPG https://cdnparap130.paragonrels.com/...62790586-6.JPG https://cdnparap130.paragonrels.com/...62790586-9.JPG https://cdnparap130.paragonrels.com/...2790586-16.JPG Sold for $1.6m 1245 E KING EDWARD AVENUE https://www.zealty.ca/mls-R2768959/1...-Vancouver-BC/ |
Reno, or whole new build? The BC Assessment pic is so different! Anyone have any other details on the house? BC Assessment pic: https://propimages.bcassessment.ca/0.../thumbnail.jpg EDIT: Found a listing that isn't deleted. https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1...14375508_zpid/ Tiny lot though, and less than 1000 sqft of living space. |
https://betterdwelling.com/canada-is...ration-record/ Better get your hands on land... we are on pace to smash last year's immigration numbers. |
noob question: How are you sales done these days? Did you guys meet up with your agent in person to go over your bid, etc and then be in the same room to listen to how he negotiates, etc and discuss your counter..... or is it just done strictly over the phone these days? |
1245 E King Edward Ave https://maps.app.goo.gl/Me2RvJkazVeMvnsYA Must have cleaned up the front lawn area before taking those photos lol |
Quote:
|
K, so it's that part of King Ed, I was going to say, that's a prestigious address ... but that area ... OK, especially after seeing the google map pics. At 996 sq ft for 3 bd and 2 ba, it's basically a condo with no maintenance fee, garage, a small yard, and that gold in YVR ... land. I can see why someone would find that particularly attractive. |
Quote:
docusign / phone |
^^ we chat voice messages my son |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I suspect most realtors are lousy at negotiation and trying to get information. Which means, there is no way they would let you listen to their conversation with the sellers agent. Some agents probably don't even talk to the selling agent at all, it's probably all done via email. |
oof conflicted indeed i think it's important to save some that aren't cookie cutters, but the entire neighbourhood under protection seems like a lot of land, perhaps only 2-3 big city blocks? |
I know someone who lives in Shaughnessy and he says it is a PIA to do any renovation. These houses are old, drafty, totally inefficient in terms of energy. You can't demolish it and so gutting it, refresh, update, renovate is only way and it is very expensive and permits time consuming. I know ... first world rich people problem. Essentially, you are sitting on $12-15M homes but you can't do much. |
Quote:
Given how difficult it is already for the City to deal with NIMBYs around Kits, I'm pretty sure Shaughnessy will remain untouched for the next 100 years. |
I wonder what the fine is to just demo these heritage homes. I mean once you demo it, then they have to approve new plans right? Pay the fine and be on your way. I can't remember who I was watching but he said rules are for people who can't afford the fine. Maybe that applies here? |
Quote:
This builder got a $200k fine for not keeping a portion of the heritage house. I heard a story in the UK where a developer torn down an ancient pub and was forced to rebuild the entire thing. |
That example is ducking stupid.. you’re saving derelict 1950’s west coast modern style homes which have been left to rot? Wtf maybe If the city was so concerned about it they should have bought it themselves. I’m on a few heritage Vancouver FB groups mostly to see old pictures and people have an insane idea of “heritage” homes. This isn’t Europe, a home built in 1900, unless it was an exceptional example of craftsmanship (thinking a building like Canuck Place, etc) who ducking cares. So many of these examples people cry about being torn down are completely unremarkable, bordering on mass produced homes. My home was built in 1911, as were the two homes on either side of mine, as well as 2 on the kitty corner, they are all very similar style with slight differences. However, over those 100+ years each home has been basically gutted and heavily renovated. I’d say my home probably sticks to its original guts the most of the 4-5 homes. With that said, other than the bones of the home, it’s a very unremarkable design. Modern craftsman style homes represent that era farrrrr better than mine ever will. Yet people think it shouldn’t be torn down or gutted simply because it’s X years old? It’s insane |
My cousin had his 1907 house in Fernwood designated. He can do whatever he wants to the interior of the house (move walls, etc. He even removed one of his fireplaces & chimneys), but has to maintain the original aesthetics on the outside. I personally love the aesthetic of victorian houses, while I find modern "box" houses absolutely fugly. |
Quote:
https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/o...ree-bc-1941607 |
I would imagine city people would be watching works on these sorts of properties like hawks. I don't think it'd be super easy to roll a bunch of demolition equipment into Shaugnessey without someone noticing.... |
Quote:
Alternatively, even if the tree was cut down illegally, make sure plans being approved for the build doesn't allow that space to be encroached. That would turn off people who illegally cut down trees for more room as it doesn't solve their problems. Am I being too much of a tree hugger? But a 170yr old tree is impossible to replace. |
I’m more upset about cutting down old trees then tearing down old homes for sure |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Spoiler! |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 PM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net