It also has to be 1500 of that model in all trim levels, regardless of how different some trim levels may be.

LOL only 94 Mercedes C55 AMGs were sold to the Canadian market over 2005-2006. Prices seems to be steadily going down. Rarity doesn't necessarily mean desirability or residual value.

OT: WTF, why does new Golf R not have the option of a sunroof????

http://vancouver.craigslist.ca/van/ctd/5020392104.html (hopefully not repost) Screw miata or S2K, pick up 240x Sr20DET drop top drift slut for $7500.

Oh rly.


time for me to hunt for one :megusta:

That's because there's nothing special about C55. All the new AMGs are pretty much better in every way, whereas for S2000, cars like that aren't being produced anymore. Nothing against older AMGs, just stating the truth.

true, they werent as sharp or growly...

but they were true, low key stealth fighters, unlike the current ones.

http://www.whichcar.pro/wp-content/u...C55-AMG-2.jpeg

usually its just a subtle kit, some fatter rubber and quad pipes (some don't even have pipes showing at all) ....

1991 BMW 318is E30

Worth a look

If the parts on this are all legit, this is an interesting deal.

94 Black del sol with fresh built 99 jdm b18cr

99 Honda Prelude SE

$3,000 only and low mileage, someone should buy it.

1990 Mazda Miata Red low K great mechanically no rust sold body with *

under $2,000, wow

Could be worth a part out if one was so inclined.

jasonturbo - thanks for the sig y0! :toot:

If you want to compare a C55 to a C63, the C63 is only good on paper. The C55 is a car you actually want to own. C55 has a bullet proof drivetrain and overall a pretty reliable and super easy to work on for DIY.

The 63 is 24/7 beast mode that eats valvetrain, gas, tires,oil, rides stiff as hell and makes my ears bleed. I don't know how any one can daily that thing the novelty wears off real quick.

1999 never had the SE, unless the owner meant the SH.

1990 Mazda Miata (MX-5)

With hardtop. Looks clean. Says $3400 in the description. Someone buy it so i don't get tempted.

Isn't that the OEM kit?

never driven one, are they gutless? 140hp plus a few mods seems like it would be reasonably quick.

dailying one right now :whistle:

To be fair, not everyone punches it when they drive their c63, when i drive the e55 , i rarely punch it cause i know its a waste of gas/tires .

When i cruise with my friends its another story but its rare.

huehueh

Your a bigger man then I am, I couldn't do it.
How you liking it so far?

1987 Shelby charger glhs
http://www.autotraderclassics.com/ca..._S-71631.xhtml


investment purchase?

it combines two of my previous cars:

it physically bashes you with its stiffness (like the abarth)

the terrible fuel mileage (like the evo)

But blends the charm, practicality and the speed all into one package.


I was camping for an e90 M3 sedan at work, until this thing arrived. It feels less precise than the M3, feels more of a brawn and brute kind of car, yet puts an even bigger smile on my face than the M3 (i've lived with company demo M3 for a few days)

The 63' is a relatively, simple, old school approach to building a euro super sedan... and I like the old school simplicity behind it.

No active dampers, no active steering, no fancy performance stability programs.... Just big brakes, a big engine, a beefy transmission and a beefy limited slip rear end. Its a German muscle car... that actually could turn very well.


Couldn't ask for much else for smoking tires and going side ways with this face :lawl:

:drool:

please start a member's journal for the 63 please, if you haven't already...

If only I wasn't in Europe right now, I'd give this guy a call. :rukidding:
Booo....

what do you guys think of this for price/condition....

2007 Audi RS4, 54,200km Black

http://images.craigslist.org/00s0s_b...jG_600x450.jpg